I've read nearly all the books on the case, including ST's, PMPT and Kolar's. They are all RDI but each puts a different perspective on it. And of course, ST is a PDI while Kolar infers BDI. Schiller points to no specific R. Kolar gave us a few previously unknown tidbits (like the feces in the candy box) but as they say- "close, but no cigar".
And I would bet anything that feces was not tested to see who it belonged to.
Odd that no one else in the house who looked for her noticed the stench of feces in the room.
And I would bet anything that feces was not tested to see who it belonged to.
Odd that no one else in the house who looked for her noticed the stench of feces in the room.