- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,373
- Reaction score
- 2,810
Fantasy conversations vs trial testimony... I'll stick with trial testimony. Lol
I agree, just showing how things can and sometimes be taken out of context,
Unless we were there, we don't know.
Fantasy conversations vs trial testimony... I'll stick with trial testimony. Lol
I agree, just showing how things can and sometimes be taken out of context,
Unless we were there, we don't know.
The defense did a demo showing how the twig held the door open per Young's testimony.
However, I am not sure if the state did one with that tiny little rock....it would have to had been placed
really carefully, because if JY messed up, the door would have closed and he would have had to
come back either through the lobby or side door and risk being seen on cameras again!!!
It's really weird how all the cameras worked when the state needed a video still of Jason, but
not when it went against their case !!!!
The rock evidence was absurd, as there was some speculation about which rock was used. Common sense dictates that rocks are kicked around all the time and that even 10 minutes later, a rock will be in a different location.
Not only taken out of context, but it is interesting the things we remember and the things we forget within a conversation. That is the nature of human memory, and it is one of the reasons why eyewitness testimony is some of the most difficult to gauge.
Exactly! Like the insistence over and over that investigators failed to get the camera images from the 4th floor exits when there was only 1 camera, and that 1 camera was focused on the elevator, which JY didn't use after the checkin.
It's like reading an Emily Litella diatribe.![]()
This is the floorplan of the hotel
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/08/article-2098316-11A446E0000005DC-433_634x428.jpg
Here's the general link
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/08/article-2098316-11A446E0000005DC-433_634x428.jpg
What heavy clothes?
This is the floorplan of the hotel
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/08/article-2098316-11A446E0000005DC-433_634x428.jpg
Here's the general link
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/08/article-2098316-11A446E0000005DC-433_634x428.jpg
Otto, that second link is the same as the first and I would love to see it if you still have it.
The only camera on 4th floor was one, on the wall near ceiling, pointed at the the elevator. Only 1st floor had cameras in the stairwell exits.
State did go thru camera evidence in some detail. See Becky Holt's closing, trial 2.
Exactly! Like the insistence over and over that investigators failed to get the camera images from the 4th floor exits when there was only 1 camera, and that 1 camera was focused on the elevator, which JY didn't use after the checkin.
It's like reading an Emily Litella diatribe.![]()
I am finding more and more things strange about this case. The same 3 motives that LE stated in Jason's NTO(3-4 days after MY"s death) are the same 3 motives the state went to trial with 4-5 years later.
The insurance policy, that MY was cutting back on work, and they were having financial problems, but none of them were true. JY would never cash in that policy, MY was going to still work enough to get full time benefits, and they were not having any money problems. It's all just wrong, it just doesn't add up.
Then there is all the mystery surrounding CY,, and the car in the driveway @5:30 am.......something is not right.