Jason Young to get new trial #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,521
Smith never defended JY in court :banghead::banghead:

I knew that. I watched both trials. You were the one that said his first attorney was Roger Smith.
 
  • #1,522
Landonsmom02 said:
Sorry but Klinkosum just defended a man that brutally raped,beat and tourtured a 4 year old child, Teghan Alyssa Skiba, here in Smithfield. I have nothing for him.

OMG I did not even connect that. :facepalm:
That was him huh?
 
  • #1,523
  • #1,524
Yes. Please find the person who belongs to the hair clutched in the cold dead hand of MY and you will find the person who created the bloodbath.

It was MY's hair.
 
  • #1,525
  • #1,526
  • #1,527
Which is exactly the risk they were talking about.

IMO, he took that risk. No doubt about it. Then he cleaned her up and left her with her mother's dead body. Chilling.
 
  • #1,528
  • #1,529
Unfortunately, public defenders do not get to pick and choose the cases they are assigned.
I believe Klinkosum also defended Jason Williford in the Kathy Taft case too.
Teghan's case was so heartbreaking I could not follow.....Quotes are messed up.\

He's in the private sector now.
 
  • #1,530
But, the purse looks out of place and seemingly not something a Mom with a 2 year old would do. You do understand that some people find the purse in the kitchen on the floor, strange.

It IS out of place. Shelly didn't testify she entered the Young home through other than the front door did she? She brought food and the purse was in the doorway between the kitchen and front door. It was in a strange place, as were the other two bags and CY's shoes.

JMO
 
  • #1,531
OK so wth is the deal with the hair?

Either it was MY's or it was a mix of MY's and others.

How can there be such varied opinions on this?
Which is fact?

TIA
 
  • #1,532
Now c'mon. Really?? How is that possible. Please leave the snarkiness out. Thanks

Everyone needs to leave the snarkiness out
including some of you who believes hes guilty.. You guys are just as bad....
 
  • #1,533
OK so wth is the deal with the hair?

Either it was MY's or it was a mix of MY's and others.

How can there be such varied opinions on this?
Which is fact?

TIA

It wasn't Jason's, that's all that matters since he was the one charged with her murder.
 
  • #1,534
No can do. Maybe SS can weigh in IF there is a 3rd trial.

Then you cant say for a fact that the purse was in the floor before the murder....
 
  • #1,535
It IS out of place. Shelly didn't testify she entered the Young home through other than the front door did she? She brought food and the purse was in the doorway between the kitchen and front door. It was in a strange place, as were the other two bags and CY's shoes.

JMO

Yes, she said she entered and exited through the front door.
 
  • #1,536
It was MY's hair.

A strand of hair was found in Michelle’s hand and was identified as being hers, based on a comparison of the DNA to her profile. However, of a clump of hair found on the body of approximately 50 strands of hair, one sample yielded a match to Michelle, while the other sample gave a partial match. (A partial match can be common in siblings or other close family members.)
 
  • #1,537
  • #1,538
The dog may have been trained to remain on the main floor. That's not uncommon.

No, his bed was in the master bedroom. Keep thinking though. I believe you will eventually reach the same conclusion as me.
 
  • #1,539
A strand of hair was found in Michelle’s hand and was identified as being hers, based on a comparison of the DNA to her profile. However, of a clump of hair found on the body of approximately 50 strands of hair, one sample yielded a match to Michelle, while the other sample gave a partial match. (A partial match can be common in siblings or other close family members.)

Actually, I believe the large clump of hair under the body was confirmed that it was MY's. The single hair in her hand --- they did a DNA test on that root and it yielded what they referred to as a partial profile but definitely said that it matched only MY and I believe the profiles were compared to all DNA collected so I think with confidence we can conclude that the hairs near the body were MY's. However, there was a hair that had been forcibly removed found on the wedding photo and they were not able to identify the DNA from that hair. How did some stranger's hair wind up in the Young's bedroom? I believe it was male DNA if I remember correctly.

(Michelle Hannon's testimony discusses the DNA testing.)
 
  • #1,540
No, his bed was in the master bedroom. Keep thinking though. I believe you will eventually reach the same conclusion as me.

What is your conclusion?????
Please, for those of us new to this case and trying to learn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
2,428
Total visitors
2,541

Forum statistics

Threads
633,088
Messages
18,636,066
Members
243,401
Latest member
everythingthatswonderful
Back
Top