- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,903
- Reaction score
- 126,805
How likely is it that the Supreme Court will over rule this decision? The decision is based on law that prevents prior bad acts, such as prior arrests and convictions, from being considered during an unrelated matter. The Appeal Court viewed the civil ruling of "slayer", and the custody arrangement, as default decisions where Jason did not participate. Furthermore, the "slayer" label was imposed based on Linda Fisher's position and not the State's position (per: http://www.wral.com/asset/news/local/2014/04/01/13529333/April_1_2014_Appeals_Court_Opinion.pdf ).
"A three-judge panel with the state Court of Appeals on Tuesday vacated Jason Young's March 5, 2012, conviction after finding that a judge should not have allowed jurors in Young's trial to hear about two civil lawsuits against him – a wrongful death lawsuit and petition for child custody, both filed by his late wife's family.
...
The Appeals Court ruled that the Young's presumption of innocence was "irreparably diminished" by prosecutors' evidence about the lawsuits as well as subsequent default judgment that Young was liable for Michelle Young's death because he refused to respond in the wrongful death case."
http://www.wral.com/state-to-ask-nc-supreme-court-to-review-jason-young-case/13533252/
"A three-judge panel with the state Court of Appeals on Tuesday vacated Jason Young's March 5, 2012, conviction after finding that a judge should not have allowed jurors in Young's trial to hear about two civil lawsuits against him – a wrongful death lawsuit and petition for child custody, both filed by his late wife's family.
...
The Appeals Court ruled that the Young's presumption of innocence was "irreparably diminished" by prosecutors' evidence about the lawsuits as well as subsequent default judgment that Young was liable for Michelle Young's death because he refused to respond in the wrongful death case."
http://www.wral.com/state-to-ask-nc-supreme-court-to-review-jason-young-case/13533252/