Jim Lichtenstein - Movie Deal?

[Lera213]

I won't watch one movie about this case. Heck I lived it and I don't want to go back in time. JL only tweeted about his shallow remarks about people's clothing and looks but he always forgot to look in the mirror first.

 

[Intermezzo]

his part 5 (from yesterday it looks like) he says OCA was supposed to be interviewed by ABC..that's what the 200k for the "pictures" was actually for but she was arrested for the check fraud the day before it was to be.

did we know that? I didnt know she had ever agreed to any interviews at all.

bbm
I don't think that info was ever released until now.
We did know Jose had received $$$ from ABC for pictures/video but not to interview Casey

I think we did discuss in the threads that Casey was spending her time on the computer...on social networks...

 

[strawberry]

I won't watch one movie about this case. Heck I lived it and I don't want to go back in time. JL only tweeted about his shallow remarks about people's clothing and looks but he always forgot to look in the mirror first.

That's why I unfollowed him. Now I tried to refollow him to see when he updates his fb stuff and found he blocked me. :loser: Guess I hurt his feelings? :waitasec:

 

[Horace Finklestein]

It's hard for me to comprehend what kind of man would be satisfied doing what he does. He's a non-player in the case, but MADE himself relevant by glomming onto and making excuses for the Anthonys so he could benefit financially and professionally. How can anyone respect or take this guy seriously??

 

[LambChop]

It's hard for me to comprehend what kind of man would be satisfied doing what he does. He's a non-player in the case, but MADE himself relevant by glomming onto and making excuses for the Anthonys so he could benefit financially and professionally. How can anyone respect or take this guy seriously??

My guess is he is holding out for CA to cave and tell him the truth. They are very much alike in neither one seems to care what people think. jmo

 

[logicalgirl]

I asked Jim L. how he felt about CA lying under oath...he seemed to think it was OK...she was 'doing what a mother was supposed to do..protecting her child'...I was pretty sure after that statement, there would be nothing unbiased about the A's coming from him. So far I have been correct. He has stated the A's are 'nice decent people' and he feels sorry for them as they have been misjudged as people and parents and grandparents. He thinks JB is a good attorney....:banghead: It is enlightening to read his posts...https://www.facebook.com/JimLichtensteinPage

Jim Lichtenstein I know them. I've seen first hand some of the pain they've felt since Caylee disappeared. Nobody could be prepared for any of the events that followed. Nobody knows how they would react if they were in the Anthony's shoes. I know I'll watch the interview to see their thoughts.

So the guy was going to talk about his "Casey trial" experiences and he posts - what - six comments and now he's "done"? The guy is either bone idle or....? Just what was the point of all that - missing the trial attention or something?
Apparently he has sworn an oath that he will never write a book or make a movie about this case.
I can't exactly understand just exactly what he does - a producer for the today show and other programs? Huh?:waitasec: He doesn't actually seem to do - anything.....

 

[21merc7]

I don't have a dog in the JL thing, but think about it. With all the threats of law suits being thrown around in this case, would you say anything negative about any of the family members or DT?

Not me. I would just back away slowly and let it all go where it decides to land.

 

[KarmaGet'em]

So the guy was going to talk about his "Casey trial" experiences and he posts - what - six comments and now he's "done"? The guy is either bone idle or....? Just what was the point of all that - missing the trial attention or something?
Apparently he has sworn an oath that he will never write a book or make a movie about this case.
I can't exactly understand just exactly what he does - a producer for the today show and other programs? Huh?:waitasec: He doesn't actually seem to do - anything.....

There is actually more than 6 posts by JL - if you expand out the comments after each if his posts (ie. "View all xx comments") you will see more information that JL posted as a comment. FWIW.

 

[luvmygarden]

I don't have a dog in the JL thing, but think about it. With all the threats of law suits being thrown around in this case, would you say anything negative about any of the family members or DT?

Not me. I would just back away slowly and let it all go where it decides to land.

You are right. I think JL is in a no win situation and is smart enough to move
on. People want the info then get mad at what the info is. Why should he put himself in that situation, it won't help anyone who is struggling with the outcome of this tragic event. The only real people with answers is KC, The A's and maybe JB and friends. But I highly doubt JB and friends really have true facts only what they claimed in OS. I appreciate JL for trying to give answers but like all of us none of it makes sense when you say it out loud.
Who can really explain people like this? No One.

 

[Meri]

Apparently he has sworn an oath that he will never write a book or make a movie about this case.

Sworn under oath? Where? To whom??

ETA: Oops - I thought you said "sworn UNDER oath" and now I see you said "sworn AN oath"!

 

[Cherry Baby]

He's an attention seeker. The FB page is not private. He wants everybody to know what he thinks, book or no book, friendly or not with the A's. If he truly wanted people to get on with their lives he'd go private with that page.

 

[logicalgirl]

There is actually more than 6 posts by JL - if you expand out the comments after each if his posts (ie. "View all xx comments") you will see more information that JL posted as a comment. FWIW.

Oh I did that but really what has he told us we didn't know? Very little....I still think he is having media attention withdrawal....Let's face it - the only reason we know who he is was because he and Cindy were stuck like glue for a couple of years...

 

[noor]

He's an attention seeker. The FB page is not private. He wants everybody to know what he thinks, book or no book, friendly or not with the A's. If he truly wanted people to get on with their lives he'd go private with that page.

Yeah, he's an attention seeker.
He wrote that the police arrested KC the night before she was going to be interviewed by ABC.
That does not even make any sense.
The police would have loved for KC to speak on camera and tell her "story".
Baez never ever would have agreed for KC to be interviewed.
ABC payed for pic's and video's KC sold them, IF she would have agreed to an interview and be payed for that. then the interview never happened, ABC would want their money back.
Then I saw pic's of JL in the bar, celebrating with the defense after the not guilty verdict.
He's standing with his arm around the lady lawyer "lady GaGa", with the biggest smile on his face.
Happy and smiling, KC was found not guilty.
JL is with NBC, he should not pick sides.
Then, the evening KC was released from jail, he was walking around the jail, with a camera, there was a live feed he provided, he was joking around, all happy because KC was walking.
It was like a party for him.
Blah.
He should just shut down the FB page and move on, take his own advise.

 

[noor]

Who knows.....maybe the defense asked JL to start the FB page to get positive attention for KC.....

He said I'm not going to write a book, the man is a proffestional, why start a silly FB page?

 

[watcher9]

I wonder if he has moved on to another case.
Has anyone spotted him at the Michael Jackson-Conrad Murray case?

 

[logicalgirl]

Sworn under oath? Where? To whom??

ETA: Oops - I thought you said "sworn UNDER oath" and now I see you said "sworn AN oath"!

To the Anthony's - sigh.....

 

[sleutherontheside]

I keep reading....."sworn by an oaf". Sheesh

 

[bayouland]

Yeah, he's an attention seeker.
He wrote that the police arrested KC the night before she was going to be interviewed by ABC.
That does not even make any sense.
The police would have loved for KC to speak on camera and tell her "story".
Baez never ever would have agreed for KC to be interviewed.
ABC payed for pic's and video's KC sold them, IF she would have agreed to an interview and be payed for that. then the interview never happened, ABC would want their money back.
Then I saw pic's of JL in the bar, celebrating with the defense after the not guilty verdict.
He's standing with his arm around the lady lawyer "lady GaGa", with the biggest smile on his face.
Happy and smiling, KC was found not guilty.JL is with NBC, he should not pick sides.
Then, the evening KC was released from jail, he was walking around the jail, with a camera, there was a live feed he provided, he was joking around, all happy because KC was walking.
It was like a party for him.
Blah.
He should just shut down the FB page and move on, take his own advise.

BBM. I just love impartial network producers, don't you?

 

[Meri]

To the Anthony's - sigh.....

Oh, well, in that case, he can break that oath at any time. Surely, they would understand.

 

[logicalgirl]

Oh, well, in that case, he can break that oath at any time. Surely, they would understand.

Hmmmm.....:waitasec: ....think you are right somehow...actually now I give it some thought that was probably written right into the "oath wording"..:great: