- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 132
- Reaction score
- 735
Thank you - thought it might have been a bit of a stretch. I'm juggling ten so far IMO; don't need to go looking for more.
Well.... JLM didn't always obey traffic laws. :facepalm:
Thank you - thought it might have been a bit of a stretch. I'm juggling ten so far IMO; don't need to go looking for more.
NELSON COUNTY, Va. — The man who abducted and murdered a Virginia teen was formally sentenced in a Nelson County courtroom Wednesday afternoon.
Circuit Judge J. Michael Gamble sentenced Randy Allen Taylor, 48, to two consecutive life sentences for first-degree murder and abduction with intent to defile in connection with the disappearance of missing Nelson County teenager Alexis Murphy.
Additionally, Taylor’s lawyer stated in his client maintains his innocence, but knows where Murphy’s body is located.
Taylor’s attorney said that his client claimed a third person was involved and that Taylor would reveal the body’s location in exchange for 20 year sentence.
However, the judge, along with Murphy’s family, rejected that offer. http://wtvr.com/2014/07/23/randy-taylor-sentence/
WOW!
“I didn’t kill Alexis Murphy,” Taylor told the courtroom.
Taylor called the prosecution “over zealous” and that he “didn’t profile black girls.” He also said that this case was perhaps “the biggest thing to ever happen to Nelson County.”
Taylor’s lawyer said he would appeal the sentence. He faced anywhere from 40 years in prison to a life prison sentence.
Wonder what would be his reason for not coming forth with this third person before? He went through the trial and didn't think revealing a third person would get him off of a murder charge?
Additionally, Taylors lawyer stated in his client maintains his innocence, but knows where Murphys body is located.
Taylors attorney said that his client claimed a third person was involved and that Taylor would reveal the bodys location in exchange for 20 year sentence.
. . . .
I didnt kill Alexis Murphy, Taylor told the courtroom.
Taylor called the prosecution over zealous and that he didnt profile black girls. He also said that this case was perhaps the biggest thing to ever happen to Nelson County.
I found this sort of interesting...
"No identifiable suspect has been found for the DNA profile in the Harrington and Fairfax cases."
quote is near the bottom of the article.
http://www.dailyprogress.com/news/c...cle_d86e00b8-4aa7-11e4-b193-001a4bcf6878.html
Excellent catch! Sloppy journalism? This contradicts express statements by LE....
Excellent catch! Sloppy journalism? This contradicts express statements by LE....
Have LE stated that DNA is the link? CNN has said that it is DNA citing "a law enforcement source told CNN". Every MSM report that have seen stating the same cites CNN as their source.
The Washington Post also claims they were told by an unnamed LE source that the "forensic evidence" involved was DNA. There's been no denial of this by LE, to the best of my knowledge. Unfortunately I don't think we'll know the truth until the trial.
Thanks. I guess if two of them are saying it I will go with (at least for now). I kind of have a chip on my shoulder about what I perceive to be a lack of integrity in news reporting lately.
Thanks. I guess if two of them are saying it I will go with (at least for now). I kind of have a chip on my shoulder about what I perceive to be a lack of integrity in news reporting lately.
Does anyone know when we can expect the DNA results to come back from the AM comparison? I would expect it to be fast, since it's not a search for DNA, but a comparison of 2 existing samples...
I believe they are going to compare JM's DNA to multiple unidentified samples found in AM's car. It doesn't sound like anyone in LE believes there is a connection so they may not prioritize it highly.
This guy makes me absolutely sick. I don't believe a word he says.
I'm on the side of LE on this one. I don't see any connection to JM that isn't based on RAT's word, and he's...well, a rat.
This was known before we ever heard the name Hannah Graham, so it's not something that just came about now. Old stuff.![]()
The Washington Post also claims they were told by an unnamed LE source that the "forensic evidence" involved was DNA. There's been no denial of this by LE, to the best of my knowledge. Unfortunately I don't think we'll know the truth until the trial.
Oh, okay--thanks! He's just looking to randomly pull everyone and anyone in to his case as the opportunity presents itself?