MaryNo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 431
- Reaction score
- 518
Thank you for taking the time to transcribe this.
When she was testifying on this, I couldn't make out what she'd said. I had forgotten that I was going to post on this for clarity. Now that I see what it was, I don't understand what she meant by:
A: That's not how it landed from the blow*
What do you think this means? It doesn't make sense to me. Could you or ANYONE help me on this?
Thank you
When she was testifying on this, I couldn't make out what she'd said. I had forgotten that I was going to post on this for clarity. Now that I see what it was, I don't understand what she meant by:
A: That's not how it landed from the blow*
What do you think this means? It doesn't make sense to me. Could you or ANYONE help me on this?
Thank you

Good morning all!
Her testimony from Thursday regarding the shell casing is a bit curious.
M: Right so how is it ma'am that if you are shooting him and that's the first thing that happened, then how is it that the shell-casing, exhibit 111 then landed in blood?
N: Objection, calls for speculation
J: Overruled*
A: It didn't land in blood*
M: You see exhibit 111, right?
A: Yes*
M: That's the casing that was involved in this case isn't it?
M: This was the first, if you will, blow, correct?
A: Yes*
M: And this is how the casing landed, do you see it?
A: That's not how it landed from the blow*
My question to her would be: Well, where did it land then? Are you suggesting that the shell casing was moved? Despite being in a "fog", you seem to be suggesting that you specifically remember the exact location of the shell casing after you shot Travis.
I'm thinking that maybe she definitively states that it is not where the casing landed because she didn't actually shoot him in that area of the bathroom, and the casing somehow ended up there during her clean up efforts. I know there was some discussion about her probably loving all the speculation about how every thing went down, and she is the only one who truly knows. I think that during this part of her testimony, she couldn't help herself and refuted the photographic evidence. It would have been better for her if she just continued with the " I don't know". Instead she definitively states "that's not how it landed".
Phew! This took me a long time to write. I hope this makes sense!