Can anyone here imagine having a normal disagreement with this...thing???
She is infuriating, and as a female who has dealt with substantiated issues with my ex (mult. arrests, ankle monitor for 1.5 years, busted out windows, knife held against me (all caught on the 911 call he pulled me away from), multiple protective orders, state-issued criminal no contact orders against him for me AND our young kids, who have witnessed events, a current court order, recent banging on windows), I WOULD SUPPORT ANY WOMAN WHO HAS SUSTAINED ABUSE.
She is manipulative, and she was the abuser, IMO, by trying to control his life and his choices with her stalking, sexuality, etc. I would LOVE to see some corroboration of her allegations, so that I would feel better about her claiming to be an abuse victim. But I don't, and I don't get it.
Travis became angry, because she was taking away his ability to make his own choices. She sabotaged his relationship with Lisa, and perhaps with Mimi. I'm sure that he tried to communicate this to JA, but she, in my observations, communicates with "semantics" and technicalities. This was an incredibly frustrating thing to TA, IMO. It is COMMON for abuse victims to lash out with angry comments, when feeling controlled, and unable to communicate their issues with that.
Jodi was a "friends with benefits" thing to TA, and by her comments, (let's adopt a don't ask don't tell policy,) she seemed to be the one that wanted this arrangement, at least from TA's point of view.
I didn't report the stalking and violent acts for a long time, because I felt that no one would believe me. People like Jodi Arias are the reason so many people hold back from reporting creepy and illegal behavior.