jodi arias TAKES THE STAND FOR 11TH DAY #55 *may contain graphic and adult content*

[oceanblueeyes]

There was a definite point, and he made it! She is a stalker and has been long before Travis. She has had LOTS of anal sex and had it before Travis. Those were the points and they were made perfectly.

ITA!

I am puzzled why some dont seem to grasp what he is revealing. It is very easy to understand and so compelling as he lays it out.

IMO

 

[Nali87]

I don't get where Juan is going with this. Someone help me.

 

[Softail]

:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead: OMG..... This is totally exhausting listening to this freaks mind games. And totally mind boggling that she actually thinks she is winning.She needs to go back here :jail::jail: and stay there. She is a hazard to anyone's mental health!!!

Well, she kind of is. In a Charlie Sheen kind of way.

 

[ctmom]

Kriptonite!!!!

 

[indicat]

No one goes to the point of being baptized into a religion without knowing everything about it. This is such a stoopid set of lies.

Most especially about sexual relations which are so important in our church. We have strong beliefs regarding this. That's why there is a pamphlet. This line she has been spewing has been one of the most ridiculous aggravating things she says to me!!

 

[snowcat]

He got her to admit that she enjoyed it!

 

[luvtenniss]

Again - she enjoyed the sex and couldn't stay away. It was mutual. Nail...in...coffin...

 

[barrysgirl]

I've had Ozzy's "Crazy Train" stuck in my head for days!

I've had that song by katie perry in my head that goes "you're hot then you're cold, you're yes then you're no" . It's all I hear while she testifies, lol

 

[StephanieHartPI]

Is it freaking lunch yet?

:nevermind:

Sadly i ate my lunch and dinner already

 

[spcagrl]

Nurmi has his finger up his nose!

Shannon Crabtree Peterson is the name that just came out of Jodi's mouth.

I think we should leave this poor lady alone. She didn't do anything wrong. Don't let this monster destroy another person.

 

[Mrs G Norris]

You didn't have to worry how he would treat you as a wife because once he'd been through you he didn't see you as wife material.

 

[bexlex]

jealous!! yeah juan!!

 

[Quester]

Lunch break! :razz:kay::skip:ullhair:

 

[trigger]

You didn't watch the Casey Anthony Trial did you?? Lol. This is NOTHING compared to the fiasco that was that trial.

Yes I did watch every minute of FCA trial. But I/m older now.. LOL

 

[otto]

That was fun!

 

[wenwe4]

You are hampered in ability to answer questions - irrespective of where the prosecutor is . . . you said because of posture
in that moment yes
changes moment to moment?

Det Flores was sitting in a chair and you lied to him
yes
doesn't matter

objection she is talking about MEMORY NOT TELLING THE TRUTH

Doesn't matter where person is sitting (how?) depends on if you lie
I would sometimes lie to TA

This line of questioning right now is not about your relationship with TA . . .about your ability to answer questions in the courtroom . . . what will allow you to answer questions in courtroom.

I thought you meant about the truth . .
M'am . .. mike could you please read

question is non-sensical
re-state the question

you understand we need your answers, as complete as possible
not the question I am getting from you
unless you are allowed to ramble on - your being restricted
in this particular case the prosecutor is cutting you off
in this cross exam - yes

6/29/07 - you broke up . . . you snooped into his telephone . . .didn't have permission to go into his telephone
not explicitly?
did you have his permission to go look @ his text messages in his phone - on that day
not that day
took it upon yourself to look into the phone - saw text messages - that upset you - you made decision relationship was over
not right that day
you were upset having conversations about bodily parts with other people via text messages

you were so upset you still went on vacation . . New York . .. a PPL conference
no it was a retreat
then to Huntington
that was the retreat
stayed with him
yes
engaged in sexual intercourse . . even though very upset with him you chose to go on vacation rather than break up with him . . . his fault you broke up not yours.

his fault that I broke up with him?
yes not your fault
it was my choice - don't know about fault
for the breakup
I guess we each had a part in it
his fault for the break up because of him doing these things? That is what motivated me to break up

you are to believe you are to blame for going behind his back
yes I felt bad about it
you say you feel bad . . . but haven't you done similar stuff in the past
yes
you went behind MM back and went and talk to Bianca
no he wasn't available . .
did you go to talk to him . . . . you could have waited
yeah if I wanted to wait for several days
you chose not to
you would have been miserable . . . .

engaged in same sort of dishonesty . . .
yes . . .I take that bad it wasn't dishonest to talk to Bianca . . . but I agree emails with bobby was dishonest

fact went to see Bianca - isn't it true MM didn't kow you had gone to her behind his back
to me that implies sneaking around -
it was not dishonest because you were not sneaking around
yes I wasn't dishonest

Look @ his communication items. .. . Aug 2007 you were stil living in Palm Desert at some point you able to look @his computer @his house in Mesa .. .
yes - his myspace emails
even though you didn't have permission to look @ thm
it was a trade off - he was looking @ mine . ... I guess I didn't have permission

saw emails from at least 2 emails . . . one of them involved New Years
didn't make you happy
didn't thrill me
happened before you and he were actually dating . . . should not bother you
that wasn't the part that bothered me - he lied what it was about . . . he called me pre-emptively
had a conversation with him before you looked @ myspace emails
he talked to me before but he lied to me about the messages
yu were checking up on him
yes I was
tosee if he was cheating
no not in December we were not dating - wanted to see if he was accurate

wanted to see things with other women
this thing
the other email you were particularly offended by . . . the other woman was married
don't want to destroy another persons marriage
Shannon Peterson Crabtree (??)
They were joking about sexual relationship .. .
he was talking about his wet dream . . . .

you believe it . . .that is why you said it . . . you believe they were joking
if what he told me could be believed they were joking
I would like to believe (they were joking)
that is the 3rd time you asked me - answer is yes

by LDS standards not to have conversations of that nature with someone elses spouse . .

you are familiar with code of conduct
I am now
you were familiar enough to pass judgement back then
yes
knowledge you have gained as part of learning about the Mormon church

you did learn it
yes
knew joking about these things not favored by LDs
that is right

sexual intercourse . . . at that point you didn't know it know it was or not acceptable in LDS church
not saying that
did you know in feb 2007 - oral intercourse was against the Mormon faith
at that time I didn't know

you are saying that just kidding between 2 people not married is not ok with LDS
if one is married in the temple

but oral sex is ok
that is what I thought

don't they have brochures
I think so

laid on top of Ryan Burns you laid on top of him asleep - you knew then
I learned about a year later
you never talked to anybody
I talked to Rachel
she's the know all in the Mormon church
you couldtalk to the Bishop
I could but would not be comfortable

you called him about TA's killing
yes
did you have a desire on your own what Mormon church allows in terms of sexual conduct
I did - I went to Rachel - August 2007 after TA and I went all the way and we were both awake . . . November 2006 until Aug 2007 you were sexually involved with TA? yes . . . did yu go to a Bishop - no definitely not a Bishop . . . there is a pamphlet free and it lays out the guidelines what is acceptable sexual contact and what is not . . . doesn't include anyting about joking about

no intercourse
it says no sexual contact

it talks about music, videos, movies should be looked @
yes
whole time 11/06 - 8/07 you didn't have any time to review and know any of that
if I knew it existed I would have known the opportunity . . .

you were conflicted when saw TA joking with someone who was married - although you believe they had not had any sexual contact
at that point I believed they had not

have no problem engaging in that conduct but you are judging someone for just joking about it?
never sought counseling from a Mormon male or Female about sexual conduct
I did but not during that time period
didn't ask anyone about how to proceed - you enjoyed it
I did but that is not why I didn't seek counsel

you said you wanted to be with him sexually
yes
he described you as kryptonite
worried about he would treat me as a wife .. wanted to give him opportunity to explain
decided to continue in this sexual relationship

Lunch Time!

 

[QueenD]

Lunch, thank you Lord.

 

[tang]

Is there any chance that this judge is a twin and the actual REAL judge will show up on the bench this afternoon?

 

[grammieto5]

did JA just nod to a jury member

 

[oceanblueeyes]

This shows she was only into the Mormon religion just to get closer to Travis.

JMO

It also shows she has an excuse for everything she does but if its Travis.......then no no its bad.

This was so riveting.

IMO