I think there is something wrong with this Nurmi. He's way too focused on the sex aspect of this case....which has nothing to do with anything...and considering he "specializes" in defending sex offenders it's beyond creepy.
I think someone should be checking out his computers.
MOO
Nobody believes this bunk.
She had sex because she enjoyed it. She had butt sex, booby sex, vaginal sex, oral sex because she liked it. Nobody is ever going to believe that the only reason she did it was because she wanted to please him.
This is from the AZ State Bar website and is a portion of the self defense/deadly force jury instructions. I think her claim fails on 2 prongs - apparent danger ends (she has an escape route) and gun was excessive force because she was being "attacked" by a naked/wet/unarmed person.
The use or threat of [physical force] [deadly physical force] is justified only while the apparent danger continues, and it ends when the apparent danger ends. The force used may not be greater than reasonably necessary to defend against the apparent danger.
The use of [physical force] [deadly physical force] is justified if a reasonable person in the situation would have reasonably believed that immediate physical danger appeared to be present. Actual danger is not necessary to justify the use of physical force or deadly physical force.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.