doesn't make sense that the gunshot wound came first. . . don't remember having conversation with Det. Flores = did you never speak to him? it was 10 years ago - it was in 2008 - 4 1/2 years ago -
I don't remember
I don't rember if I talked to him or not again after the autopsy.
DA asks for a minute.
TA's sisters back in front row - (they might have been there before and camera didn't show them)
REmember giving your opinion to Det. Flores - cut to throat was last wound? I he testified in another court that information? NO - so he is wrong? Objection - sustained
You have no memory discussing scene photos w/Det Flores? NO - I do not have any recollection of that - I have been answering this question
Re-direct . . .
do you remember having an interview w/this person wearing glasses and talk to them about the sequencing the injuries Did you stop interview and say No I don't want to talk to them about sequencing. I felt gunshot wound would have been last but would have come after injuries to the hands.
Who was in the room with you - forensic, students, photographers - by report they are in an observation room. Det is not in same room - observation bay separated by glass. If they want to talk to you - how do they provide this advice? They don't usually - they have a hand set they can pick up and talkto me and I would go t the window and talk to them. I would not say which is first right away - I would want pathology, histology, minimum of one month and up to 4 months. I conducted autopsy 6/12 report dated 7/15 - 8 pg report.
Sequence of events not written in report - it is not practice to write sequence in report - it would be speculative . . . after having all info then make determination
