double SS, capitolized.
ooooh, chillllly draft .... c c cold.
Voynich,
your free verse at the end or your poetic quote is oh so dark and chilling!
unexpected twist.
goose bumps as the darkness attempts to grasp and .....
JonBenet Ramson letter - written before or after + linguistics
- Thread starter voynich
- Start date
double SS, capitolized.
ooooh, chillllly draft .... c c cold.
Voynich,
your free verse at the end or your poetic quote is oh so dark and chilling!
unexpected twist.
goose bumps as the darkness attempts to grasp and .....
Ames
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 5,838
- Reaction score
- 58
I totally agree with that!
you're in serious denial.
lol you guys are so funny. I should be writing ransom notes for a living.
I guess there's a difference between how you read the RN ad SD and I do.
Fear is the path to the darkness. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
Maikai
New Member
They weren't released because there was NOTHING on the computer that could be used against them. Anything that put the Ramseys in a favorable light were ignored by Steve Thomas.
Hi voynich.
lol. Good, voynich. I'm glad I could recipricate and make you laugh! I most certainly had a good chuckle at how that read.
RNs ... ya ... I heard that can be quite lucrative.
KoldKase
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 996
- Reaction score
- 31
Excuse me?
How does the BPD not finding any child
on the Ramsey computers become some injustice at the hands of Steve Thomas?That's some convoluted logic you've got going there, Maikai.
KoldKase
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 996
- Reaction score
- 31
It really is not that complicated:
There is clear and unrefuted evidence of prior vaginal injury. Since having a paintbrush shoved up her is also undisputed evidence of sexual assault--not "sexual" as in "for sexual pleasure", obviously, but sexual ASSAULT because of the area being assaulted, it's hardly a big leap to the conclusion that one was staged to cover up the other, as the use of a "paintbrush" is hardly explained in any other reasonable way.
But go ahead and ignore this, deny it, "Don't go there, pal," because we all know that this leads to the very small inner circle of the Ramseys. Can't allow THAT to muddy up the IDI theories.
And ignore the FACT that the linguistics in the ransom note clearly lead to the Ramseys. Patsy and John repeatedly used phrases from the ransom note when speaking extemporaneously in their interviews scores of times we can count. Patsy's exemplars are RIDICULOUSLY easy to match to the ransom note: "The two gentlemen" at the table? (COME ON! If you think she wrote that to MOCK LE, then ask yourself why the mother of a murdered child would do THAT?) Personal information in the note and crime were so obvious, even John remarked to Det. Arndt it was "an inside job". Even if John had no idea what had happened, he saw a copy of the ransom note brought to the home that morning by LE and HE SAID IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB. Why ignore this?
And why would anyone ignore that PATSY COULD NOT BE ELIMINATED as the writer of the ransom note by every handwriting analysis expert but one, including THEIR OWN PAID ANALYSTS? John said it. Pam Paugh saw the similarities and said it. Instead, IDIs keep harping on that Patsy wasn't ARRESTED, so that's proof she didn't write it. You've got it upside down: Patsy wasn't ELIMINATED as the writer, she was in the home, it was her child, all evidence of the crime leads to PATSY: her pen and pad, her paintbrush, her fibers, her handwriting and linguistics, her lies and obstruction of the investigation, etc., etc., etc.
What a coincidence! How lucky is this foreign faction?! Hanging out in the house, lolling around in the kitchen watching for the Ramseys while the rest of the gang is busy killing a child in the basement for...some reason...which ensures they won't get their ransom, after all....
There is NO EVIDENCE to put any intruder IN THE KITCHEN that I've seen. So that's pure speculation. In fact, other than a few cells of DNA--and those in the undies were degraded so that they have not gotten a full profile from them to this day--there is no evidence at all that doesn't lead to the Ramseys in the home the night of the murder.
There is not one piece of evidence leading to ANY intruder in 12 years.
NOT ONE.
But IDI's want to throw all that out the door because Lacy found a few cells of DNA at the crime scene, OUT OF AN ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD FULL OF PLENTY OF ARTIFACT, as any household has. What we don't know is if they ever tested THE CORD OF THE GARROTE, or the paintbrush pieces, or the alleged package of Bloomies withheld from the investigators for FIVE YEARS, among other things, for "touch" DNA. Did they do this? Did they find any OTHER DNA they can't identify?
We'll never know, because Boulder is way too deep into burying this case to ever tell us THE WHOLE TRUTH.
When they open the files and we can see EXACTLY what was tested, investigated, and what the results were, then maybe we can know the full truth of this murder investigation.
Until then, we're all just speculating because this case is FUBAR.
There is clear and unrefuted evidence of prior vaginal injury. Since having a paintbrush shoved up her is also undisputed evidence of sexual assault--not "sexual" as in "for sexual pleasure", obviously, but sexual ASSAULT because of the area being assaulted, it's hardly a big leap to the conclusion that one was staged to cover up the other, as the use of a "paintbrush" is hardly explained in any other reasonable way.
But go ahead and ignore this, deny it, "Don't go there, pal," because we all know that this leads to the very small inner circle of the Ramseys. Can't allow THAT to muddy up the IDI theories.
And ignore the FACT that the linguistics in the ransom note clearly lead to the Ramseys. Patsy and John repeatedly used phrases from the ransom note when speaking extemporaneously in their interviews scores of times we can count. Patsy's exemplars are RIDICULOUSLY easy to match to the ransom note: "The two gentlemen" at the table? (COME ON! If you think she wrote that to MOCK LE, then ask yourself why the mother of a murdered child would do THAT?) Personal information in the note and crime were so obvious, even John remarked to Det. Arndt it was "an inside job". Even if John had no idea what had happened, he saw a copy of the ransom note brought to the home that morning by LE and HE SAID IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB. Why ignore this?
And why would anyone ignore that PATSY COULD NOT BE ELIMINATED as the writer of the ransom note by every handwriting analysis expert but one, including THEIR OWN PAID ANALYSTS? John said it. Pam Paugh saw the similarities and said it. Instead, IDIs keep harping on that Patsy wasn't ARRESTED, so that's proof she didn't write it. You've got it upside down: Patsy wasn't ELIMINATED as the writer, she was in the home, it was her child, all evidence of the crime leads to PATSY: her pen and pad, her paintbrush, her fibers, her handwriting and linguistics, her lies and obstruction of the investigation, etc., etc., etc.
What a coincidence! How lucky is this foreign faction?! Hanging out in the house, lolling around in the kitchen watching for the Ramseys while the rest of the gang is busy killing a child in the basement for...some reason...which ensures they won't get their ransom, after all....
There is NO EVIDENCE to put any intruder IN THE KITCHEN that I've seen. So that's pure speculation. In fact, other than a few cells of DNA--and those in the undies were degraded so that they have not gotten a full profile from them to this day--there is no evidence at all that doesn't lead to the Ramseys in the home the night of the murder.
There is not one piece of evidence leading to ANY intruder in 12 years.
NOT ONE.
But IDI's want to throw all that out the door because Lacy found a few cells of DNA at the crime scene, OUT OF AN ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD FULL OF PLENTY OF ARTIFACT, as any household has. What we don't know is if they ever tested THE CORD OF THE GARROTE, or the paintbrush pieces, or the alleged package of Bloomies withheld from the investigators for FIVE YEARS, among other things, for "touch" DNA. Did they do this? Did they find any OTHER DNA they can't identify?
We'll never know, because Boulder is way too deep into burying this case to ever tell us THE WHOLE TRUTH.
When they open the files and we can see EXACTLY what was tested, investigated, and what the results were, then maybe we can know the full truth of this murder investigation.
Until then, we're all just speculating because this case is FUBAR.
Hi voynich.
re: vocab,
"relevant to my assessment of McMenamin conclusion" - vn
JBR Case: Analysis of Ramsey's Press Conference
http://www.lsiscan.com/ramsey_s_press_conference.htm
There's also a list, somewhere in cyberspace, a vocab list from DOI. If I find the link I'll post it fer ya.
OK found it: http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/doi-index.htm (DOI "unofficial index")
re: vocab,
"relevant to my assessment of McMenamin conclusion" - vn
JBR Case: Analysis of Ramsey's Press Conference
http://www.lsiscan.com/ramsey_s_press_conference.htm
There's also a list, somewhere in cyberspace, a vocab list from DOI. If I find the link I'll post it fer ya.
OK found it: http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/doi-index.htm (DOI "unofficial index")
JMO8778
..at the beach!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,554
- Reaction score
- 42
ok,whatever you say. empowering=denial ::attempting to grasp that one::
it may be awhile.I don't think even Einstein could figure that equation.
JMO8778
..at the beach!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,554
- Reaction score
- 42
that's not how LE works.
that doesn't twist well,even with one of those jar lid removers.
JMO8778
..at the beach!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,554
- Reaction score
- 42
absolutely.unquestionably.undeniably.without a doubt.
and for that matter,it is absolutely the STUPIDEST
I have ever read.reminds me of a 70's song..'desperado...why don't you come to your senses..'
JMO8778
..at the beach!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,554
- Reaction score
- 42
be sure to take the course Ransom Notes 101: How NOT to Write One
before you do.The Ramsey's kinda missed that one.
JMO8778
..at the beach!
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 5,554
- Reaction score
- 42
oh nooo way. ..I've seen firsthand what living in DenialLand does to ppl.It should be a ride at Disney.You keep going 'round n 'round,having fun all the while,yet never going anywhere.
DenialLand is a nice place.Everyone is happy in that little place.
Talk plain, voynich.
Was that a lucky guess, or are you really on to the meaning of that signature?
Wow, I'm flattered.
Similar threads
Online statistics
- Members online
- 62
- Guests online
- 2,352
- Total visitors
- 2,414