JonBenet Ramson letter - written before or after + linguistics

  • #341
Gender Genie?? I have just submitted two different things to this so-called Gender Genie....one from a man I know personally, and also a post written by SuperDave.

Both responses were that the author was FEMALE.

Hi eleven.

chuckle ... gawd ... you're good, that is brilliant!
 
  • #342
Gender Genie?? I have just submitted two different things to this so-called Gender Genie....one from a man I know personally, and also a post written by SuperDave.

Both responses were that the author was FEMALE.

Can you prove it by posting just what it was you submitted?
 
  • #343
Gender Genie?? I have just submitted two different things to this so-called Gender Genie....one from a man I know personally, and also a post written by SuperDave.

Both responses were that the author was FEMALE.

Thats rich.

LOL
 
  • #344
You say it doesn't take a political science degree to see the left-wing rantings in the ransom letter. More like it doesn't take a degree to see how phony the left-wing talk is. It's just random gibberish.

At least you can see its left wing. Fake left, but left nonetheless. You've got your political hat on. Most don't seem to see left or right in the RN.

Consider at least that this RN had left-leaning political references that were not relevant to kidnapping for ransom or to sexual assault on a child, whereas L&L RN was politically sterile.

Would you mind defining "over the edge RDI? Sometimes I have trouble distinguishing this stuff.

Falling into the eternal pit of RDI-dom. Never to return.
 
  • #345
What coincidence? If there's no relation, then there's no connection. It's not hard to try and sound like a leftist agitator. Anyone who had spent enough time in Boulder would run into enough of them. You can't spit in that town without hitting the next Ward Churchill.

Yeah, you're right SD. The idea that JBR's leftist ransom note is in any way linked to the leftist event exactly 5 years prior to the day, is probably a bit more than we could handle! Its a very remote idea. I won't bring it up again. I only believed I knew something about December 25 that RDI didn't. Even after 12 years, able to learn something new, eh SD?
 
  • #346
Hi Hotyh.

ya. 1991, end of an era.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991

21 décembre, Conférence d'Alma-Ata (Kazakhstan) : Fin de l'URSS : 7 autres républiques de l'URSS rejoignent la CEI : l'organisation se dote d'un conseil des chefs d'état et d'un conseil des chefs de gouvernement, la Russie récupère les armes nucléaires de l'Ukraine, de la Biélorussie, du Kazakhstan.
24 décembre : La Russie est reconnue par les Occidentaux comme État continuateur de l'Union soviétique et lui succède au Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies.


21 décembre - Conference of Alma-Ata: END OF USSR: 7 other republics of the USSR rejoin the CEI: .....

December 25 – Mikhail Gorbachev resigns as president of the Soviet Union, from which most republics have already disbanded; the 73-year-old state is now expected to dissolve completely.
December 26 – The Supreme Soviet meets and formally dissolves the Soviet Union.
 
  • #347
At least you can see its left wing. Fake left, but left nonetheless. You've got your political hat on. Most don't seem to see left or right in the RN.

I've always been very political.

Consider at least that this RN had left-leaning political references that were not relevant to kidnapping for ransom or to sexual assault on a child, whereas L&L RN was politically sterile.

I knew that.

Falling into the eternal pit of RDI-dom. Never to return.

I see, I think. I assume then, that there IS a category of RDI you do respect, or is that just wishful thinking?
 
  • #348
Yeah, you're right SD. The idea that JBR's leftist ransom note is in any way linked to the leftist event exactly 5 years prior to the day, is probably a bit more than we could handle!

Sarcasm is not very becoming, HOTYH.

Its a very remote idea. I won't bring it up again.

Hey, it's your call.

I only believed I knew something about December 25 that RDI didn't. Even after 12 years, able to learn something new, eh SD?

I suppose so.
 
  • #349
  • #350
Can you prove it by posting just what it was you submitted?


As I responded in the above post to SuperDave, I used his post #276 in this thread.

Furthermore, this "Gender Genie" (such a cutesy name, ha ha) wants the user to check whether the submission is a) Fiction, b) Non-Fiction or c) a blog entry.

I tested the post, as well as something written by my male friend, with the fiction checked.......results were FEMALE.

I then tested the post with the non-fiction checked.....results were FEMALE.

Finally, I tested the post with the blog entry checked.....and once again, the results were FEMALE.

For the "proof" you are asking for, try it yourself! Again, that was post #276.

I think the Gender Genie's reliability can be put to rest. Without a doubt. It's a fun little novelty game, though.

OR....I do suppose SD could be harboring a secret that we don't know! After all, the internet provides MUCH anonymity. :-)
 
  • #351
Hi eleven.

That Gender Genie was fun.

I entered my posts and ...

at just over 100 words my masculin score was double that of the feminin.
at just over 500 words my masculin score was approx 500 vs 400 for feminin.

The gender genie confused my gender as well,
sample? stylistincs?

http://bookblog.net/bbarchives/categories/gender_genie.php

the disclaimer: "Despite having written the program, I didn't come up with the algorithm and believe that the Genie works no better than the flip of a coin."
 
  • #352
  • #353
Patsy had very little tolerance for disobediance. A trait she learned from her own mother, from what I know of her.

Oh my! Nedra reminded me of an Army Drill Sergeant.
 
  • #354
Let me be more specific. The case is famous NOW. JonBenet was NOT famous THEN.

I am digressing here, but I HAVE TO post it. I watched Cindy and George Anthony give their CIVIL depositions. They are simply not as smart as the Ramseys. George gives answers that differ from his interview with the police and he is obviously lying. You would not need to be an expert to watch his face contort every which way. And then they shoot to Cindy and she answers the Same QUESTIONS with a different answer - pretty much the same answer George gave originally to the police.

I do not understand the lawyer for the Anthony's allowing this to happen because it will DEFINITELY come back to haunt them and their daughter at the trial. There will be some way that the prosecution will get this in and then the Anthony's will look like liars and their credibility goes out the window and any hope they have of swaying the jury is gone.

As opposed to John and Patsy who at every turn were cool calm and collected and would say I don't recall, maybe John knows or maybe Patsy knows or I am just not sure, etc.

It is interesting to watch the Anthonys and then remember the Ramseys and compare the answers and their body language. George is all over the place and obviously lying, especially about Caylee contributing to the household expenses. When answering, he looks like he is chewing on a piece of lemon.
 
  • #355
  • #356
As I responded in the above post to SuperDave, I used his post #276 in this thread.

Furthermore, this "Gender Genie" (such a cutesy name, ha ha) wants the user to check whether the submission is a) Fiction, b) Non-Fiction or c) a blog entry.

I tested the post, as well as something written by my male friend, with the fiction checked.......results were FEMALE.

I then tested the post with the non-fiction checked.....results were FEMALE.

Finally, I tested the post with the blog entry checked.....and once again, the results were FEMALE.

For the "proof" you are asking for, try it yourself! Again, that was post #276.

I think the Gender Genie's reliability can be put to rest. Without a doubt. It's a fun little novelty game, though.

OR....I do suppose SD could be harboring a secret that we don't know! After all, the internet provides MUCH anonymity. :-)

I tried it and it guessed FEMALE, correctly with me.
 
  • #357
Is it possible that John also helped write the letter. It surely is.

YEP!!! I believe that she wrote it, and the RN, with his help. I believe that he dictated parts (RN) of it to her..."Listen Carefully" being one of the parts...and in her grief and haste, she wrote the words...instead of just listening carefully to what he told her to write. I believe that she probably took what John said, but worded some of it her own way, that is why the Gender Genie said FEMALE. Patsy has already admitted that she and John wrote things together. They each would write something, and then combine the two things together. She said that her own self.
 
  • #358
I am digressing here, but I HAVE TO post it. I watched Cindy and George Anthony give their CIVIL depositions. They are simply not as smart as the Ramseys. George gives answers that differ from his interview with the police and he is obviously lying. You would not need to be an expert to watch his face contort every which way. And then they shoot to Cindy and she answers the Same QUESTIONS with a different answer - pretty much the same answer George gave originally to the police.

I do not understand the lawyer for the Anthony's allowing this to happen because it will DEFINITELY come back to haunt them and their daughter at the trial. There will be some way that the prosecution will get this in and then the Anthony's will look like liars and their credibility goes out the window and any hope they have of swaying the jury is gone.

As opposed to John and Patsy who at every turn were cool calm and collected and would say I don't recall, maybe John knows or maybe Patsy knows or I am just not sure, etc.

It is interesting to watch the Anthonys and then remember the Ramseys and compare the answers and their body language. George is all over the place and obviously lying, especially about Caylee contributing to the household expenses. When answering, he looks like he is chewing on a piece of lemon.

Cindy gets on my nerves with that gum chewing of hers. Like a cow...
 
  • #359
OR....I do suppose SD could be harboring a secret that we don't know! After all, the internet provides MUCH anonymity. :-)

Very funny.
 
  • #360
Very funny.

I am sure that eleven was joking. For the longest time, other posters thought that I was a guy. Miss Marple (from JB on WIKI), posted about my strangulation and kept referring to me as a HE. I had to email him and tell him that I was a female. I know that it's because of my HAT. AMES is a nickname though.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
2,860
Total visitors
3,005

Forum statistics

Threads
632,883
Messages
18,633,033
Members
243,326
Latest member
ktb534
Back
Top