BlueCrab said:
capps,
If a Ramsey wasn't involved in the crime, why are the Ramseys lying, refusing to cooperate with the investigation, and covering up -- obviously to shield the identity of someone? Why would they coverup to protect a lowlife who molested and murdered their 6-year-old daughter?
BlueCrab,
Pardon me if I sound frustrated ... but every time I post my theory,you post back with the same questions which I have repeatedly replied back to you.
So I don't have to retype it all,this is again the reply I gave to you on the thread "Was This Ever Asked?":
To answer your three givens:
1. We know the Ramseys are covering up something. Wouldn't they do this ONLY if a Ramsey family member was involved in the killing?
I see it more as the Ramsey's being evasive,than a "cover up".Some people understand "cover up" as "staging" ... I don't believe the Ramsey's did any staging,maybe the paid low life (intruder) did though.I believe the Ramsey's are being evasive for fear of these powerful business associates/friends because of more revenge,or some kind of back lash,some thing in that vein,
that may hurt John even more etc.We cannot rule it out,and accept it as ONLY family.
2. We know the CBI handwriting experts said John didn't write the ransom note and it was unlikely Patsy wrote it, but they couldn't eliminate BR as the writer. Wouldn't this strongly suggest BR was the writer, but who apparently had help with the wording from an older person ?
It was "unlikely" Patsy wrote it. "Unlikely" tells me ...gee,it looks sort of like Patsy's writing,but not quite. Seems to me that SOME ONE was trying to copy Patsy's handwriting/style.Surely,with Patsy knowing her "social graces",there were plenty of thank you notes,invitations,etc.to business associates/friends to go around and copy from.True,they couldn't eliminate Burke,but they couldn't eliminate Patsy either.
3. We know the DNA eliminates JR, PR, and perhaps BR (the authorities are allowed to legally lie to protect the identity of a juvenile), so that leaves the DNA of an unidentified fifth person in the house that night. Wouldn't the fifth person in the house that night likely be the older person who helped BR with the wording?
No one knows the DNA of the intruder ... maybe the fifth person is the low life.
Let's also talk about the enchanced few last minutes of the 911 call. I honestly am not convinced. Only a very few select people have heard a good copy of it,that's not enough to sway me. But ... for the sake of argument ... let's say it was BR. Why after some believe the family had all night to stage and plan this kidnap/murder cover up,would BR,just minutes before the police are to arrive,be saying:"Please,what do I do?" and "What did you find?" Doesn't fit in. I believe IF BR came down stairs,the Ramsey's in their hysteria,wanted BR out of the way .... and not involved in this horrible situation,and told him to stay upstairs in bed,and lied about it,to protect him from the crazy situation tat was only going to get worse. He was only 9 years old and his sister was just kidnapped.
I want to set the record straight ... BC, I am not trying to prove you wrong.that is not my intent.In fact your theory is very good,and I do not rule it out. But IMO,my theory is just as credible.
I respectfully take your theory in consideration,and continually ask you different questions to fill in some of my doubts.Please feel free to ask me any question about my theory,or even state you diagree. But asking the same question that I have replied to over and over again is ... well ... frustrating.