JonBenet's Dream Team

[Ravyn]

And also the statements the R's gave the morning of the 26th was find until JR realized that it put him being the last on to see JB alive...And what religion you are shouldn't never come up cause God fearing people commit crimes..And about the cord he sounded like he knew for sure...

 

[Ravyn]

Now reading Lou Smit interviews with JR well heck sounds more like buds chatting than anything.LS was giving answers and way outs..So maybe LS suspect PR just like everyone else...But what happens if this turns out to be JR that pulled PR into it and he made sure there was more pointing to PR...Stranger things as happen...

 

[JMO8778]

I've often wondered that,too.Patsy would have been shown more sympathy than JR,due to her cancer.And JR took a shower;Patsy did not.Patsy physically wrote the RN,JR did not.JR handed LE Patsy's notepad.And JR inserted himself into the crime after LE arrived (11am,when talking to his other kids).
anything I missed? there's bound to be more..

 

[BBB167893]

Now reading Lou Smit interviews with JR well heck sounds more like buds chatting than anything.LS was giving answers and way outs..

That's just what the cops thought.

 

[JMO8778]

there is something very fishy about Smit and his involvement in this case,no doubt.

 

[Theonly1]

If there had not been a Lou Smit at the point in the case when he appeared, would IDI taken on the mythical proportions that it has today?

 

[DeeDee249]

If there had not been a Lou Smit at the point in the case when he appeared, would IDI taken on the mythical proportions that it has today?

Probably not.

 

[BBB167893]

If there had not been a Lou Smit at the point in the case when he appeared, would IDI taken on the mythical proportions that it has today?

Highly doubtful.

 

[Theonly1]

Is Lou Smit still alive? If so, does he have any new ideas about who committed this crime? What did he think about the John Mark Karr development and fiasco?

 

[madeleine]

Is Lou Smit still alive? If so, does he have any new ideas about who committed this crime? What did he think about the John Mark Karr development and fiasco?

@bold

I really hope N O T. :bang:

 

[madeleine]

He just had a theory like we all do,the difference is we don't manipulate the entire world with it.What's the difference between his theory and mine or yours,we don't brag about it on TV trying to convince people non-facts are facts.They needed the stun gun theory as bad as they needed the unknown male dna.Why didn't they agree to exhume the body then?SPIN SPIN SPIN.They thought a well-known ,experienced detective would do it.I've seen many people being fooled by LS.Oh da man has a reputation,you just gotta believe him over Steve Thomas and so on. :boohoo: I've seen what kind of questions he asked JR in the LE interviews.If that's called experience..............

 

[JMO8778]

I agree,LS was very unprofessional.you don't have to have studied criminology to spot it.the interviews alone were so transparent.

 

[BBB167893]

Is Lou Smit still alive?

Far as I know.

If so, does he have any new ideas about who committed this crime?

Probably. The question should be, "does he have any GOOD ideas?"

What did he think about the John Mark Karr development and fiasco?

Funny thing. He kind of went into hiding after that for a while. And everyone was VEEEEEERY careful not to mention his name.

 

[Ravyn]

Also strange that the R's hired John Douglas the Mindhunter author to profile their case and in his book he writes about people staging crimes to lead LE away from the actual killer(s)..Now of course JD said the R's didn't do this crime..

 

[madeleine]

Also strange that the R's hired John Douglas the Mindhunter author to profile their case and in his book he writes about people staging crimes to lead LE away from the actual killer(s)..Now of course JD said the R's didn't do this crime..

JR said at some point that J.Douglas thinks it was a person close to the family.At least he has a better point than L.Smit and Lacy.

 

[Ravyn]

JR said at some point that J.Douglas thinks it was a person close to the family.At least he has a better point than L.Smit and Lacy.

This is true...But still wonder what he thought of the RN, and the changing of their accounts of that morning...

 

[Ravyn]

Also the case John Douglas profile on about the 3 eight year olds have found new evidence that the 3 teenagers could be innocent and this shows he can make mistakes...

 

[madeleine]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14429987/

John Douglas, former FBI profiler hired by the Ramseys: The news that was coming out over the air it seemed as if the family was responsible.

But then, in January 1997, Douglas conducted a four hour interview with the Ramseys. Days later, he shared his impressions with Dateline, noting he was immediately struck by the couple’s description of the moment John found JonBenet’s body.

Douglas: And everyone hears him screaming and running upstairs “My god! My baby!” and he grabs the child and removes the duct tape and carries the child upstairs where they’re trying to resuscitate the child.

The Ramseys described to Douglas the horrific details of what they said happened in those next few frantic moments.

Douglas: It was a real emotional scene for the family, putting the child in front of the Christmas tree as they’re trying to rub the skin, the body is cold, the mother’s hysterical, the father’s hysterical, the minister is there, neighbors running in and out, so there really isn’t a crime scene...

The desperate rescue attempt, which completely contaminated any evidence at the scene, painted a picture of a family in agony, Douglas said, and he told Dateline this week that he couldn’t believe the Ramseys he encountered in his interview were capable of such brutality.

Douglas: And here is a young child, such force cracking her skull. This is not a crime of parents. Parents certainly kill. But not these kinds of parents. blah......

Indeed, Douglas says, even when parents commit murder, it’s not usually as horrific as the scene at the Ramsey’s. oh really?

Douglas: When parents kill, there’s generally a softening of the crime scene. Where they take a blanket, cover up the child, roll the child over, face down or something like that. The child was found, JonBenet was face up. Her hands were tied together. Her head was off to the side. She had a piece of duct tape over her mouth.

And now, looking back nine and half years later, Douglas can’t shake the conclusions he first made about the case:

Douglas: I came to a very quick resolution that they’re barking up the wrong tree. This investigation is going in the wrong direction here.

And it turns out, another expert thought the Ramseys were being treated unfairly as well.

 

[madeleine]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14429987/page/2/

John Douglas, former FBI profiler: If I was within the law enforcement circles, like I’ve done for years in the bureau, I could be saying that. The problem was that the bureau and the police were on the same track. the right one I would say And that track was leading to the Ramsey family.

But there was also at least one person inside the investigation who agreed with the intruder theory.

Former Detective Lou Smit: There’s evidence of somebody else doing this, and it’s credible evidence.

LOL

 

[madeleine]

You know what's really interesting?Some say RDI's judge the book by it's cover and blame the R's cause of their strange behaviour.
But I see that "experts" like Smit and Douglas base their theories on "They couldn't have done it.I talked to them,they're nice ppl.parents don't do that to kids,blah,blah,blah....."