NJ Joyce Coleman, 28, Long Valley, 27 Feb 1970

  • #21
Most likely the answer is closer to home…
March 1990View attachment 637321
Wow I missed that article. That changes everything.

I thought it was odd that the burglar stole only firearms, but now it looks like other random things also... Who steals a hair dryer?

This article states that Joyce put the house up for sale because they were having financial problems; that's contradictory to what Wayne told police, which was that they put the house up for sale that day because he received a job transfer to either Georgia or Massachusetts. I also thought it was strange that they put the house up for sale before they even knew where they were going.

Also contradictory... It was a burglary, but the burglar was angry at her and it was personal.. apparently, he knew her and his way around the house... But they couldn't narrow it down to any acquaintances.

I did think that leaving the cyanide well within reach of a child was highly irresponsible, possibly criminal; I never saw any accessible ant poisons around the house when I was little. (Then again, even when me and my siblings were 3 years old, my parents never had to tell us not to drink the Clorox. We simply had no urge to do it because... It wasn't food. If we climbed onto a shelf, we'd raid the cookie jar. We wouldn't try to eat anything.)
 
Last edited:
  • #22
There were other articles I found while looking into the couple that I thought were odd (regarding Wayne), but I didn't post because 1) they were unrelated to the murder, 2) they could be viewed as prejudicial, and 3) the list of linked articles in the original post was long enough already. (There were some records on Ancestry that worked into a timeline of events... Not sure if those are acceptable sources.) Here's a rundown of what I found in the articles... I can post them later on this evening (if necessary), but just know that Newspapers.com was my source for everything:

1) Wayne didn't transfer to Georgia or Massachusetts; instead of the trucking company, he worked in the service department for a Ford dealership in Williamsburg, VA. Compare that to what StarrChance's article said... In February, he was married and selling his house because of an upcoming job transfer. 6 months later, he has a completely different job, different state than he'd originally stated, and he's remarried.
2) Her was arrested on a gun charge (unregistered) while in Virginia, and the article stated that he had 2 felony convictions in NJ.
3) Those felony convictions were non-violent - motor vehicle larceny, although it was much bigger than that. He was one of several arrested for taking part in a statewide car theft ring. This was in the 1960s, before they were married.
4) Worth noting that the woman he married after Joyce was from Neptune, although they were married in Virginia.
 
  • #23
I see what you are saying with the last paragraphs. When I first read about the child dying a couple years later, I thought that a bit concerning. However, it could be just an unfortunate coincidence. I do not see an issue with a father requesting payment on an insurance policy. If the policy had been taken out weeks or 1-2 months prior to the death, that may raise some eyebrows.

I asked earlier about an established time of death. I was wondering about WCs arrival home, call to the police and what time he actually left work. I see that the article is stating 11:30-1:00 am. The trip from Newark area to that address would seemingly take 45-60 minutes depending upon the exact location in Newark etc. If he left at 12:30 am, that puts him home around 1:15. If the earlier article of 1:45 am for police contact is accurate, that would give 30 minutes to commit the crime and clean himself up. Of course he may have left work earlier than 12:30 since his shift ended at 12:00 apparently.

It feels like the perpetrator may have been familiar with the husbands work schedule and I still wonder more and more if this was not the work of a local. Someone who had done this before ( as the previous poster stated, in various unconnected locations) , who knew about the guns and was evil enough that he would murder a pregnant woman to avoid getting caught ( which does not explain the anger displayed and described by John Douglas). When looking at the aerials from 1984 in the Woelki case, this area was remote. I just don't know about someone "passing through" even today, there is no where to pass through to ( even more so in 1970).
Quick note, by "passing through", I just meant he wasn't local. Maybe visiting someone. Obviously its too far from the interstate.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
96
Guests online
3,875
Total visitors
3,971

Forum statistics

Threads
638,012
Messages
18,721,723
Members
244,249
Latest member
foe
Back
Top