Not I, called the wolf. I wouldn't need concrete proof. All I would need is a clue, and I would be on it.mysteriew said:Unless a wife is faced with concrete proof, she won't suspect the husband.
Yes, I would. If I found a poem like that, lived with the man for however many years they were together by 1977, you bet I would poke around following the other murders. A woman knows her husband better than anyone. She picks up on every nuance. 30 long years they lived under the same roof. Think about it. Most of the time during a conversation I pick the thoughts right out of my fiance's head, and we have been together only 4 1/2 years. Sometimes all it takes to know what is on his mind is a simple matter of body language.But really, if there is a serial in your city- would you be analyzing your hubby's behavior in comparision? A man you know, have kids with, argue with, eat with, sleep with?
Ok, so LE interviewed her over the course of a couple of days. They know how to interrogate people. I don't disregard that. I imagine that given the circumstances, it was an intense interrogation as well.
Still, the two possible scenarios are bothersome: either she subconsciously chose to ignore the signs, or didn't notice them, period.
I'm sorry. Something about that just doesn't sit right with me. It isn't normal.
Until the time comes when she can really go into some real depth about that man as she knew him, this is just how I feel about the matter. It is not a harsh or prejudiced opinion; it's just all I have to go on at present.