- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
- Messages
- 49
- Reaction score
- 196
Did someone testify that Joan said the phone was found in her yard? Because that is what she said, but I thought there were numerous objections to hearsay regarding what Joan said at the AT&T store.
That is what I thought also. I don't think anything came in except Joan at the store, they stated they couldn't get the video. Then, wahla, they have the video during cross of another witness, that made no sense.Did someone testify that Joan said the phone was found in her yard? Because that is what she said, but I thought there were numerous objections to hearsay regarding what Joan said at the AT&T store.
It was rainy on the 18th. The 22’s might not have been too loud, but people shot all the time in the neighborhood over at Cal’s place. Mr.Watkins (Kit’s neighbor) clearly did not hear any gunshots……No one heard 13? gunshots either. In the morning and in the late afternoon.
But if he didn't have his hearing aids in, he wouldn't have. Mr. Watkins I mean.It was rainy on the 18th. The 22’s might not have been too loud, but people shot all the time in the neighborhood over at Cal’s place. Mr.Watkins (Kit’s neighbor) clearly did not hear any gunshots……
So, how was the DA able to argue that Kit through it into Joan’s yard if Joan stating that she found the phone in her yard were not facts in evidence? (That was a rhetorical question, Spiritecho. Glad I’m not the only who thought that.)That is what I thought also. I don't think anything came in except Joan at the store, they stated they couldn't get the video. Then, wahla, they have the video during cross of another witness, that made no sense.
so Pam's friend who was on the phone with her...she went there with her daughter at 6 and then again at 7. Did she not call the police????She didn't go in the house but didn't call the police? Did I miss that?
That’s my understanding based on the testimony and closing arguments, as well.You're correct, I think. I don't believe she contacted the police until after the bodies were found the next day.
I agree. It is a pretty easy trial to consider. You either think there is a reasonable possibility that Joan Harmon did it and you vote to acquit or you think Kit did it beyond a reasonable doubt. But, I think deliberations will go for a bit (Maybe into Friday) out of respect for the Phillips if the jury is inclined to acquit, no matter how much they disliked the prosecutor. Plus there was a lot of expert testimony, ballistics, videos, timelines, etc. to go through.Am I the only one here that is restless and can't find something to do while the jury is out; even though there is much here that needs doing? I listened to the entire defense closing but couldn't get into The Commonwealth's closing at all.
Not interested in the Durst trial at all.
Just checked and that jury deliberations clock is still clicking away on Court TV…and it is past 5:00.


There also could be a split on opinion with these 8 men and 4 women.I agree. It is a pretty easy trial to consider. You either think there is a reasonable possibility that Joan Harmon did it and you vote to acquit or you think Kit did it beyond a reasonable doubt. But, I think deliberations will go for a bit (Maybe into Friday) out of respect for the Phillips if the jury is inclined to acquit, no matter how much they disliked the prosecutor. Plus there was a lot of expert testimony, ballistics, videos, timelines, etc. to go through.
And they are asking for it pretty late.so jury is asking for dinner so they can keep going. awesome!