- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 485
- Reaction score
- 1,605
But it is her tale. Since 2015 she has built up a scenario that diverges from all the info we had before, including from law enforcement. Has anyone from law enforcement ever confirmed any of her latter-day facts? Has anyone ever independently verified her claims? Has Rebecca Morris or any reporter who covered the story gone to the witnesses (CL, his sister and grandmother, the bus driver) and asked them? If they have, they've never said - I've never even found a "we asked so-and-so but they declined to comment".
It all comes from Desiree. And now we have Kaine, who got all the same info as Desiree, disagreeing with her claim that the four witnesses were more than second-hand info.
And I don't see how acknowledging this is anything other than victim-friendly. Facts are facts. Evidence is evidence. None of it depends on whether the person who claims them is a victim themselves. Ultimately it is about finding Kyron, and giving out wrong or misleading info and claiming them to be facts are at best inefficient - at worst detrimental. That's not victim-friendly in my book.
The way I see it, Desiree and Kaine are victims, yes. But so is Terri. Yes, she is obviously the main suspect of the police, so she's sleuthable by Websleuth rules, but she has never been indicted, never been charged and never been convicted. She's not perfect, sure, but victims don't need to be.
Regarding victims:
" But so is Terri ..." makes no common sense.
Perpetrator's are those who take action / commit crime's... and generally are cowards (imo) who bring results of their actions.
Perpetrators are not victims.
She hasn't been indicted YET. Common sense indicates Terri's arrest is coming. She will never be a victim, she will be held accountable.
There are legal procedures to nullify immunity...watch and see.
Justice4Kyron. Justice 4 victims.
jmo moo omo