I sure wish LE had sealed that house from day 1 and not let anyone in. There are photos of DB leaving with clothes and JI, too. The phones could have been in the pile of clothes or the backpacks.
They did. The house was held for 1-3 days (can't remember which) and the road was blocked during the investigation.Me too! Why didn't LE immediately think of the home as a crime scene? A baby was missing.........a CRIME had occured.
IDK I just want to cry.
imo
They did. The house was held for 1-3 days (can't remember which) and the road was blocked during the investigation.
Am I the only person who doesn't think LE has found anything crucial? I hope I'm wrong; I am so anxious for sweet baby Lisa to be found! But I just don't feel like they've found anything...
I dont believe they were for the first day or two. The first day they were being questioned all day during the time the house was processed.But the parents were able to go in and out as they pleased.....and so could other family members, right?
I think it was fine for HLN to show the graffitti in the little concrete ditch right near the home. To me it just shows that some teens have been hanging out there, and probably smoking pot or drinking there. It might turn out to be important info.
And about the possibility of wine being given to the baby to drink. I doubt that an 11 month old would drink much wine. It tastes pretty nasty to a little baby and if she did drink much she would throw it up, imo.
The effects of alcohol poisoning in children can be far more dangerous than those that are experienced by adults. For a start, the alcohol can lower the childs blood sugar levels very quickly and it can also lower the body temperature. Children have a much larger surface area in relation to their overall weight and they will quickly become hypothermic.
The first few years of a childs life are essential for development and any poisoning can affect this development and even lower intelligence. Some children may have been given alcohol deliberately by their parents in order to quieten them down, some parents dont realise that even small amounts of alcohol can be fatal to infants and small children.
I scanned the article in your link... and now I have an awful feeling... it has to do with LE digging up the trees and moving brush and digging. I have a feeling they're looking at other stuff - that may have been there much longer than Lisa's disappearance. Just a hunch and I could be wrong (and probably am). But, you wouldn't have to dig up trees and brush to get at something buried within the past two weeks. MOO
God I hope I'm wrong.
ETA: Again, DB/JI are trying to keep the focus on the *front* of the house, yet LE is focused on the *back* - and focused on foundations, digging, moving trees, etc.
But the parents were able to go in and out as they pleased.....and so could other family members, right?
Very true! I learned this in my trial advocacy class. Small inconsistencies, like which lights were on, are actually normal. I could even see the change between 6:40 and 7:30, given the traumatic event.
6:40 and 10:30 is a significant inconsistency, and not something that could be changed by suggestible memory, recovery from trauma, etc. Possible to be explained by "I wanted to say I checked on her again because I didn't want anyone calling me a bad mother," but there has to be an explanation. That inconsistency isn't small enough to be a minor change.
Am I the only person who doesn't think LE has found anything crucial? I hope I'm wrong; I am so anxious for sweet baby Lisa to be found! But I just don't feel like they've found anything...
The house WAS roped off and treated as a crime scene for the entire first day or two. Much video to prove it.When I rule the world, I'm going to make it SOP that every home of a missing child is searched thoroughly from Day One and roped off from family until LE is done. And families won't complain b/c they'll know that it is SOP.
:Crown: