Let's Follow the Evidence...OR the Lack of It

  • #41
Agree with Chrishope on FW. FW actually met with then Gov. Romer to request a special prosecutor be appointed. According to FW and PW's letter to the people of Colorado, that idea for a special prosecutor was squelched by then Chief Koby.
 
  • #42
[/B]

OK, so the post by Cynic also says he thinks there was only the one blanket taken from the WC - the white one wrapped around JB. And DeeDee confirms the evidence list included items from both the WC and living room.

So, do we now agree then, that there was only one blanket in the WC, even though Det. Everett testified there were two? Since the nightgown was also there, I could accept he mistook the nightgown for a blanket, especially because Everett does not say he saw the nightgown.

Back to Cynic's post about JR's reference to the chair "still" blocking the door - indicating he might have made an earlier trip, as Madelaine suspects, before LE arrived, because of the timeline which squashes his available time after LE arrived

From http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-basement.htm, here's other info about when JR told anyone about his professed first trip to the basement:
"John Ramsey said that he had gone down to the basement at around 10:00am that morning. It was the first the police had heard about this. None of Det. Arndt's reports indicated that Ramsey had visited the basement before the body was found. Ramsey now told the detectives for the first time about his finding the broken window open, which had surprised him. Taken aback by the revelation of Ramsey's visit to the basement, Thomas asked him why he didn't report what he found to Det. Arndt since someone could have entered through the window. Ramsey said he didn't know why. He just didn't know, he said a second time. When asked if he also went into the boiler room and checked the wine cellar. He didn't go into that area of the basement, he said."

Reminder, JR stated in a couple of other sources that he DID tell Arndt about the window that morning.

The truth is always the truth and an account of it does not change. It's the lies in statements that eventually get misconstrued and mistaken. :moo:

Let's consider this: JR said chair "still there" when he went down after 10 am. French did not report broken window or chair blocking door. Fleet reports broken window, but makes no mention of chair in front of door or placing one in front of door as he left. But the crime scene photos of the basement do show a small chair being in the basement.

Without more complete police reports available for public review, we have to assume that police missed seeing the broken window on their check before White checks, or Fleet lied, or John was in the basement between the time LE arrived and the time Fleet went through, taking enough time to break the window and clean up, which is highly unlikely given the circumstances.

From the Carnes deposition:
Mr. White testified that when he began his search, the lights were already on in the basement and the door in the hallway leading to the basement "wine cellar" room (footnote 10) was opened. (SMF 25; PSMP 25; White Dep. at 147, 151-52.) He further testified that a window in the basement playroom was broken. (SMF 26; PSMF 26; White Dep. at 28, 152 & 154)

Footnote 10: Although referred to as the "wine cellar", the room was actually used for storage and was "a dark, dirty area" with mold growing on the floor. (F. White Dep. at 228.)

Under the broken window, Mr. White states there was a suitcase, along with a broken shard of glass. (SMF 27; PSMF 27; White Dep. at 28-29, 156-59, & 265.) He does not, however, remember whether the window was opened or closed. (Footnote 11). (SMF 28; PSMF 28; White Dep. at 153.) Mr. White also opened the door to the wine cellar room, but he could not see anything inside the door to the wine cellar room, but he could not see anything inside because it was dark and he could not find the light switch. (SMF 29; PSMF 29; White Dep. at 159-61.)


This is from: http://www.acandyrose.com/crimescene-basement.htm
"By now the police had asked Vale Christianian, the co-owner of Mike's Camera in Boulder, to measure the ambient and reflected light inside the wine cellar with its door open and the lights out, to verify what could and could not be seen during a quick glance inside the room. The test showed that there was not enough light to see anything in the dark unless the viewer had spent time getting accustomed to the darkness or his eyes adapted quickly to the surroundings."

"However, there was a possible explanation. JonBenet's body was inside the room to the left. It might not have been visible to White standing just at the threshold and blocking reflected light from entering the room. Yet if someone stood 5 to 10 inches inside the threshold, more reflected light would have entered. Then, looking directly to the left, the person might have seen the white blanket in the dark room. Maybe there was enough reflected light from just outside the door."


So, Nom, JB's body, as DeeDee has said several times also, probably was not dragged from a corner or moved once she was placed in the Wine Cellar wrapped in her white blanket. Everyone agree?

Why would there be a reason for Fleet to lie in his testimony about there being a broken window on his first trip to the basement? Would he have lied about not seeing JB?? I doubt it. I think due to the lighting situation, he did not see what he might have recognized as JB's body in the darkness. But did he mention seeing a bit of white blanket in the WC to John, prompting JR to then bring him in on helping to stage the window break and the suitcase thing? Was Fleet with John during the 10 am trip to the basement as well as the 1 pm trip to the basement? So they could pose a kidnapper/intruder theory, since JR convined Fleet he needed help because he knew either Burke or Patsy had killed JB??? Was that what the war was about?? Just because JR said he went to the basement alone during the 10 am trip, should we be able to believe him? Is there any accounting of where Fleet was at that time?

If Fleet knows/helped JR stage an intruder break-in, he might be afraid to give any sort of revealing testimony unless there in an arrest and he can trade off for some sort of immunity. If he keeps trying to push for investigation of Ramsey guilt, but gives no details, he stays safe. The RST can't harm him in any way because it would send rockets off. As long as he is seeking for Ramsey investigation, White stands the best chance of leniency from LE if it is found he has been subject to threat from JR.

Also, the chair thing. More than once, JR states the thing about the chair in front of the door. No one else does, but there is a chair in the basement photos. JR had no witness to validate seeing him moving a chair, so I submit he lied about moving the chair, more than once, and said it to establish why his fingerprints could have been found on it, if they had been. Or in case there was any other question as to why that chair had been in that area causing JR worry that the chair would be addressed during the investigation of the crime.

Recap: Please feel free to comment in a post response!
1) Because of the differences in JR's statements regarding his trips to the basement, it is possible to believe he could have gone down there prior to the first check by LE. Agree?

1) JonBenet was wrapped in her white blanket and placed into the WC, where John later found her, evidently in the same position as when she was first placed in the WC, and no other blankets were evidenced as being from the WC. Agree?

2) Police did not report finding a broken window in train room, or chair in front of door. Agree?

3) White might not have seen broken window on his first trip to basement, instead was coerced into helping JR stage intruder break-in. Possibility White is hoping for Ramsey confession or prosecution due to fear of being victimized by RST. Agree?

4) JR lied about moving the chair from in front of the train room door to allude to intruder escape or in order to provide a cover for his own fingerprints being found on the chair. Agree?

midwest mama,
As an ad-hoc response, here are my thoughts:

The broken window, that he broke then maybe an intruder along with the chair in front of the door, oh, and by the way, Its an inside job, has always mystified me.

If JR had planned it so, he need not bring it to anyones attention, LE doing their job would uncover all this.

So what is JR doing: smoke and mirrors is my answer, he is offering answers to questions to nobody asked.

I think it is highly likely that JonBenet was originally in the train-room, and that JR moved her into wine-cellar.

This would explain FW's experience early that morning, and then later on with JR present.

Possibly some forensic evidence, e.g. barbie-doll, pink barbie nightgown were also in the train-room, this might explain their apparent redundacy in the wine-cellar?

That is the train-room might have been the original location for staging JonBenet's kidnapping, but for some unknown reason JR changed things at the last moment, possibly realizing some aspect directly implicated either him or another family member? It might also explain the need for using a blanket, no intruder needs a blanket for a dead child!

It is entirely possible that JR moved JonBenet. If this were so, it would explain a lot of things, not least FW's version of events.

Assuming the latter, also explains why JR is offering FW alternative explanations for the broken window and LE his opinion that its an inside job, and with the chair moved, a mistake of course. So when it comes to finding JonBenet, JR knows where to look right away.

i.e. there appears to be some correlation between JR's behaviour relating to the basement, the forensic evidence and his discovery of JonBenet, i.e. its not accidental!


.
 
  • #43
midwest mama,
As an ad-hoc response, here are my thoughts:

The broken window, that he broke then maybe an intruder along with the chair in front of the door, oh, and by the way, Its an inside job, has always mystified me.

If JR had planned it so, he need not bring it to anyones attention, LE doing their job would uncover all this.

So what is JR doing: smoke and mirrors is my answer, he is offering answers to questions to nobody asked.

I think it is highly likely that JonBenet was originally in the train-room, and that JR moved her into wine-cellar.

This would explain FW's experience early that morning, and then later on with JR present.

Possibly some forensic evidence, e.g. barbie-doll, pink barbie nightgown were also in the train-room, this might explain their apparent redundacy in the wine-cellar?

That is the train-room might have been the original location for staging JonBenet's kidnapping, but for some unknown reason JR changed things at the last moment, possibly realizing some aspect directly implicated either him or another family member? It might also explain the need for using a blanket, no intruder needs a blanket for a dead child!

It is entirely possible that JR moved JonBenet. If this were so, it would explain a lot of things, not least FW's version of events.

Assuming the latter, also explains why JR is offering FW alternative explanations for the broken window and LE his opinion that its an inside job, and with the chair moved, a mistake of course. So when it comes to finding JonBenet, JR knows where to look right away.

i.e. there appears to be some correlation between JR's behaviour relating to the basement, the forensic evidence and his discovery of JonBenet, i.e. its not accidental!


.

UKGuy - This we agree on: JR did not accidentally find JB in the WC! DeeDee has helped us before with trying to decide if JB could have been carefully moved from one location to another. If she had been wrapped "papoose style", which is JR's description, and laid on her back, just as she was supposedly found, in a train room location, would there have been a compromise to the livor pattern that was seen if she was picked up gently, and replaced into the WC? If it is possible no additional marks would have occured, then I can agree also that she might have been moved during JR's trip alone sometime after 10 am..

The condition of the train room is so askew, that it would not be surprising that there was some sort of turmoil in that room. The strewn train tracks, electrical motor, toys, and even the mark on the wall might support that also. Especially with Kolar pointing out the marks on JB's torso matched up with the prongs of the toy train track.

Here is a page worth looking at with regard to the book, "Mindhunter" by J. Douglas, which was found on JR's nightstand. There are several references that include some of the same information we have about the crime against JB: http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/...rinter_format&forum=DCForumID61&om=1240&omm=3
 
  • #44
UKGuy - This we agree on: JR did not accidentally find JB in the WC! DeeDee has helped us before with trying to decide if JB could have been carefully moved from one location to another. If she had been wrapped "papoose style", which is JR's description, and laid on her back, just as she was supposedly found, in a train room location, would there have been a compromise to the livor pattern that was seen if she was picked up gently, and replaced into the WC? If it is possible no additional marks would have occured, then I can agree also that she might have been moved during JR's trip alone sometime after 10 am..

The condition of the train room is so askew, that it would not be surprising that there was some sort of turmoil in that room. The strewn train tracks, electrical motor, toys, and even the mark on the wall might support that also. Especially with Kolar pointing out the marks on JB's torso matched up with the prongs of the toy train track.

Here is a page worth looking at with regard to the book, "Mindhunter" by J. Douglas, which was found on JR's nightstand. There are several references that include some of the same information we have about the crime against JB: http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/...rinter_format&forum=DCForumID61&om=1240&omm=3

midwest mama,
Yes rainsong makes some important points, particularly the use of the Douglas' book as a possible staging 101 manual?

I could accept an undoing explanation in relation to JonBenet, except her staging and clothing was all intended to match the Ramsey's version of events, so JonBenet had to be clothed.

I think JR could have moved JonBenet around or after 10AM . Fixed lividity sets in about 8-hours after death. This could be slightly earlier or later depending on the surrounding environment. Assuming a TOD about 12:30am then full lividity could be setting in around 8:30 am, so 10:00pm or after should allow JR to move JonBenet without inducing any lividity marks?

I think nearly everyone accepts what is unusual about the Intruder Theory is that the Intruder took time out to place JonBenet inside the wine-cellar. Much more realistic might be JonBenet left in a suitcase close to or beneath a window in a room that was a potential escape route?

Without FW's version of events, I reckon I would simply accept the wine-cellar scenario. Now I think JR simply used the wine-cellar to dump incriminating evidence. Stuff he found on his time out travels.

If JR was a victim of PR's scheming then why does he implicate himself into the crime-scene so readily, with his Inside Job remarks, or I broke the window, or go missing when the ransom demand call is due?

Although I cannot outline the connection between JR and Train Room, the forensic evidence, i.e. suitcase, doll, nightgown etc, I reckon it exists, even if its only one of staging.


.
 
  • #45
Going back through some of the interviews with the R's, during June 1998, from "JonBenet, the Police Files", pg 226, Patsy is asked about reading because of the books that were found on the R's nightstands.

Her response is: "To tell you the truth, I don't know that I read all that much. I mean, I read a lot of magazines and that kind of thing."

Pg 349, here is conversation between Michael Kane and JR:
"MK: Okay. What about "Mindhunter," John Douglas' book was there in the house? Had you purchased it?
JR: No. It was there in '96? Interesting."

So, both liars? Or one liar, and which one was the liar?
 
  • #46
As a follow up to responses above, I am recapping the most popular thoughts:

Clipped from reply post of Chrishope;1) Because of the differences in JR's statements regarding his trips to the basement, it is possible to believe he could have gone down there prior to the first check by LE. Agree?

Agree. This is possible.

There is agreement that JR might have gone to the basement before LE went through. If this is true, and we use Patsy's timeline from JR being in the shower at 5:30 or so, then in about 30 minutes, JR finished his shower, responded to Patsy's finding of the note, ran around and checked on Burke, went down and read the ransom note fully as it was spread on the floor while Patsy called police, ran back upstairs and rechecked JonBenet's room, got dressed, came down again and went into the basement, moving the chair which was in front of the train room door, and closing the window in the train room, which he found open - then went back upstairs and directed French to the note on the floor. Possible?

1) JonBenet was wrapped in her white blanket and placed into the WC, where John later found her, evidently in the same position as when she was first placed in the WC, and no other blankets were evidenced as being from the WC. Agree?

Most likely, yes.

2) Police did not report finding a broken window in train room, or chair in front of door. Agree?

Agree, but they did report something to the effect that there was no evidence of forced entry. I find it hard to believe that even the Keystone Kops could have missed a broken window.

I have to agree with this, and I must think that French thought the closed window, with the broken hole appeared to him as being an old break, and there were no other indications of a fresh entry into the house through that area. The mess in the train room as shown on the photos must not have seemed unusual to French.

3) White might not have seen broken window on his first trip to basement, instead was coerced into helping JR stage intruder break-in. Possibility White is hoping for Ramsey confession or prosecution due to fear of being victimized by RST. Agree?

Disagree. I think it's very unlikely FW involved himself in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. He doesn't strike me as a man easily coerced into things.

OK - We'll assume that White did see the break, but perhaps had the same opinion of it as French - old break, nothing too unusual othewise.

4) JR lied about moving the chair from in front of the train room door to allude to intruder escape or in order to provide a cover for his own fingerprints being found on the chair. Agree?

There is no reason for JR to worry about fingerprints. It's his house, and it's the R's chair. The chair being in front of the door (if in fact it was) doesn't help with the intruder theory. At least not if the intruder was supposed to have exited via the window in the train room.

So, the question now is why might JR, having gone to the basement before LE arrived, have found a chair in front of the train room door?

If there was no chair in front of the train room door, why would JR have lied to establish his movement of the chair?
 
  • #47
Going back through some of the interviews with the R's, during June 1998, from "JonBenet, the Police Files", pg 226, Patsy is asked about reading because of the books that were found on the R's nightstands.

Her response is: "To tell you the truth, I don't know that I read all that much. I mean, I read a lot of magazines and that kind of thing."

Pg 349, here is conversation between Michael Kane and JR:
"MK: Okay. What about "Mindhunter," John Douglas' book was there in the house? Had you purchased it?
JR: No. It was there in '96? Interesting."

So, both liars? Or one liar, and which one was the liar?

Well I think we know they're both liars, but on this particular subject I'd say JR. His answer starts with a lie, then a question designed to confuse, then a nonsensical comment. Typical JR. IIRC wasn't Mindhunter found on his nightstand?
 
  • #48
As a follow up to responses above, I am recapping the most popular thoughts:



There is agreement that JR might have gone to the basement before LE went through. If this is true, and we use Patsy's timeline from JR being in the shower at 5:30 or so, then in about 30 minutes, JR finished his shower, responded to Patsy's finding of the note, ran around and checked on Burke, went down and read the ransom note fully as it was spread on the floor while Patsy called police, ran back upstairs and rechecked JonBenet's room, got dressed, came down again and went into the basement, moving the chair which was in front of the train room door, and closing the window in the train room, which he found open - then went back upstairs and directed French to the note on the floor. Possible?




I have to agree with this, and I must think that French thought the closed window, with the broken hole appeared to him as being an old break, and there were no other indications of a fresh entry into the house through that area. The mess in the train room as shown on the photos must not have seemed unusual to French.



OK - We'll assume that White did see the break, but perhaps had the same opinion of it as French - old break, nothing too unusual othewise.



So, the question now is why might JR, having gone to the basement before LE arrived, have found a chair in front of the train room door?

If there was no chair in front of the train room door, why would JR have lied to establish his movement of the chair?

If French and FW saw a closed and locked window, with a broken pane, they would naturally assume that no one exited that way. Who would reach back through a hole in the glass to lock the window once they were through it? So then the question is, why would JR close and lock the window if he broke it to stage a break in?

And how does the chair fit in? :waitasec: No one else even noticed it or paid any attention to it. Why does JR bring it up at all? I think it had something to do with the crime itself, and his bringing it up is a "tell".
 
  • #49
If French and FW saw a closed and locked window, with a broken pane, they would naturally assume that no one exited that way. Who would reach back through a hole in the glass to lock the window once they were through it? So then the question is, why would JR close and lock the window if he broke it to stage a break in?

And how does the chair fit in? :waitasec: No one else even noticed it or paid any attention to it. Why does JR bring it up at all? I think it had something to do with the crime itself, and his bringing it up is a "tell".

Nom de plume,
Good questions, and excellent analysis by midwest mama.

I think the best theory to explain the forensic evidence is that JR staged a crime-scene in the train-room, when everyone missed this, and JR had had time to think stuff through, he decided to change the staging, so he moved some forensic evidence into the wine-cellar, including JonBenet!

JR's big mistake was not knowing FW had already looked in the wine-cellar and thought it did not include JonBenet!

Later when JR finds JonBenet in the wine-cellar, more or less right away, the alarm bells are ringing for FW.

With JonBenet relocated JR invents reasons for some of the forensic evidence i.e. I broke the window, I placed the suitcase in the basement etc.



.
 
  • #50
at bold
it's either French is totally incompetent for not noticing a broken OPEN window (possible forced entry) OR the window wasn't broken or it was broken and closed.

I really would like to know what he wrote in his report about his trip to the basement...

IMO this is one of the huge reasons why the cops suspected the parents....their reports from that morning contradicted so many things the parents claimed....

It most likely was broken, as there would have been little to no opportunity to break it after the 911 call.

Finding a broken window pane, whether it appears to be an old break or not, requires some explanation in the report - one would think. W/o further explanation, the broken window is at odds with the finding of "no forced entry".

The explanation is simple enough; very little broken glass laying around, the grate in place, the spider web intact.

Because the police did such a poor job it's impossible to say whether the window was open or closed. It should have been noticed and recorded, one way or the other.

We do know that JR did not mention closing the window to officers on the scene - you know, the officers initiating an investigation into the kidnapping of his daughter. Seemingly, this would be an important piece of information. It's only months later, when JR finally consents to talk to police, that he mentions closing the window. By this time of course, LS is pushing the intruder theory.

There is very clearly evidence of staging a kidnapping, which would require intruders, then pushing the "inside" job theory (which technically still requires intruders, but of a different sort) then after LS lends his "help" JR is back to the intruder/kidnapper theory. The window closed contradicts the intruder theory as per LS's dog and pony show. The window open at least doesn't contradict the LS intruder theory. Hence, months later, the closed window is explained by JR as having been closed by himself - though of course he isn't sure just why he did this, or why he didn't mention it to officers/detectives on scene on the 26th.
 
  • #51
If French and FW saw a closed and locked window, with a broken pane, they would naturally assume that no one exited that way. Who would reach back through a hole in the glass to lock the window once they were through it? So then the question is, why would JR close and lock the window if he broke it to stage a break in?

JR would only do this to "unstage" the scene. It was obvious, even to BPD, that no one had exited that window, for the reasons you mention.

And how does the chair fit in? :waitasec: No one else even noticed it or paid any attention to it. Why does JR bring it up at all? I think it had something to do with the crime itself, and his bringing it up is a "tell".

I think it has to do with "re-staging". JR seems to be going from an intruder/kidnapper through the train room window scenario, to an "inside" job scenario.

I've deleted most of my bookmarks on this case, but I do recall JR saying something along the lines of the kidnappers were extremely clever to be able to put the chair in front of the door after themselves as they escaped through the window. Of course by this time __ is paid off and is pushing the intruder through the window theory, including stepping up on the suitcase (despite there being a much more stable chair very nearby). The chair in front of the door is incompatible with this theory - a theory JR wasn't trying to push at 6am when the police arrived. Hence, the nonsensical statement months later.
 
  • #52
JR would only do this to "unstage" the scene. It was obvious, even to BPD, that no one had exited that window, for the reasons you mention.



I think it has to do with "re-staging". JR seems to be going from an intruder/kidnapper through the train room window scenario, to an "inside" job scenario.

I've deleted most of my bookmarks on this case, but I do recall JR saying something along the lines of the kidnappers were extremely clever to be able to put the chair in front of the door after themselves as they escaped through the window. Of course by this time __ is paid off and is pushing the intruder through the window theory, including stepping up on the suitcase (despite there being a much more stable chair very nearby). The chair in front of the door is incompatible with this theory - a theory JR wasn't trying to push at 6am when the police arrived. Hence, the nonsensical statement months later.

Chrishope,
JR, Mr Clever and nonsensical statement do not seem to go together. I reckon JR has made a mistake and is attempting to talk around it. He could have used the chair to access JonBenet or hide the underwear?

.
 
  • #53
Chrishope,
JR, Mr Clever and nonsensical statement do not seem to go together. I reckon JR has made a mistake and is attempting to talk around it. He could have used the chair to access JonBenet or hide the underwear?

.


If he was hiding the underwear in the ceiling, yes. I'd assume the police would have found it if it happened that way. Why would the chair be needed to "access" JBR?
 
  • #54
If he was hiding the underwear in the ceiling, yes. I'd assume the police would have found it if it happened that way. Why would the chair be needed to "access" JBR?

Chrishope,

Abduction 101:

Step 1: Remove the body.


Could be JonBenet was hidden away above eyesight requiring a chair to fetch her down?

The chair patently plays some role, but not as indicated by its final position, so either it was intended as part of the crime-scene, or a means to an end in hiding forensic evidence or JonBenet herself?


.
 
  • #55
Chrishope,

Abduction 101:

Step 1: Remove the body.


Could be JonBenet was hidden away above eyesight requiring a chair to fetch her down?

You mean laying on some pipes or something like that? Is there such a spot in the basement?
 
  • #56
I was watching a video of the crime scene taken a few hours after the murder. And I remembered reading that in the RN there were lines written from popular movies back then....As I was watching the crime scene footage in the basement I notice a large framed poster picture on the wall of the movie AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN.

Just found it interesting, and wanted to post that's all.

A distinguished officer,
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bennett_Ramsey"]John Bennett Ramsey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

Was John considered to be both the officer and gentleman? Or was the gentleman in reference to someone else?........Perhaps John bought it because it reminded him of himself. Or perhaps it was a gift?

Question for any LEOs.
Where there any matching movie posters hanging in the house that could be connected to the movie lines written in the RN?
 
  • #57
If he was hiding the underwear in the ceiling, yes. I'd assume the police would have found it if it happened that way. Why would the chair be needed to "access" JBR?

If the basement had a "suspended" ceiling comprised of easily removable panels, it is very possible the chair may have been used to access the panels to hide the panties, duct tape, cord, etc. And as sloppy as the police work was, I would highly doubt that they even looked.
 
  • #58
You mean laying on some pipes or something like that? Is there such a spot in the basement?

Chrishope,
Pipes, as in Pan or water, where are we going with this?

A chair, in general, extends a persons height range.


.
 
  • #59
:bump:

This thread is too good not to read at least once. What's interesting is that when you follow the evidence, all roads lead to RDI. This thread includes fibs and lies told by the Rs.


23 MIKE KANE: And so this was before or do

24 you remember if this was before or after the

25 Whites and Fernies (INAUDIBLE)?

0174

1 JOHN RAMSEY: I think it was after,
2 because they came fairly early.

3 MIKE KANE: Was it long after?

4 JOHN RAMSEY: I really don't remember

5 specifically. The best I can do is, it was, I

6 believe, after the police came. Because they had

7 gone through the house before I figured out what

8 I'm going to do. It was before ten o'clock. They

9 had already done some preparation before that. So

10 it would have been before. Probably before nine.

11 So then somewhere between seven and nine.

12 MIKE KANE: Okay. I think it's, and this

13 may put things into perspective. I think you were

14 saying that you were expecting a phone call

15 between ten and 12. The note said between eight16 and ten.

17 JOHN RAMSEY: Oh, really?

18 MIKE KANE: So does that note, does

19 that put into context, between eight and ten,

20 where were you?

21 JOHN RAMSEY: (INAUDIBLE) yeah. Really it

22 does. When we were ready for the phone call and I

23 was prepped about what I was going to say and I

24 was getting the family ready. And so between that

25 period of time we were just waiting for the phone

0175

1 call and I was near the phone. And I was either in

2 the study or on the first floor. I just waiting

3 for it.

4 MIKE KANE: So it would have been before

5 that?

6 JOHN RAMSEY: It would have been before

7 that time period.

8 MIKE KANE: But would if have been before

9 the time that you said Linda prepped you? I

10 believe she arrived later on; she arrived around

11 eight o'clock or so?

12 JOHN RAMSEY: No, it was before that.

13 MIKE KANE: It was before that?

14 JOHN RAMSEY: (INAUDIBLE) my time --

15 MIKE KANE: No, I understand. That's why

16 trying to (INAUDIBLE).

17 JOHN RAMSEY: But if the note said, eight

18 to ten, which I don't remember.

19 MIKE KANE: Yes, it said that, eight.

20 JOHN RAMSEY: We were well prepared. There

21 was recorders set up; there was wire taps in

22 place; Linda had briefed me on what to say. So she

23 would have gotten there, gosh, quarter to seven,

24 seven. I'm sure --

25 MIKE KANE: Yeah. No, I'm just trying to

0176

1 put the time --

2 JOHN RAMSEY: Yeah. But she was there for

3 a while. She was there a good while before we were

4 ready for the call.



so he didn't go between 8-10 because he was near the phone,that's when the note said the kidnappers would call


December 26, 1996
Approximate Sequence Events
Approximate Arrival/Departure

Patsy Ramsey dialed 911 (5:52am)
Patsy Ramsey phoned Whites
Patsy Ramsey phoned Fernies
John Ramsey (reading note)
Burke Ramsey (sleeping??)
JonBenet Ramsey (missing)
Officer Rick French arrived (5:59am)
Officer Karl Veitch arrived
Sgt. Paul Reichenbach arrived
Fleet White arrived (6:30am)
Priscilla White arrived (6:30am)
John Fernie arrived
Barbara Fernie arrived
Mary Lou Jedamus-Advocate (6:45am)
Grace Morlock-Advocate (6:45am)
Officer Barry Weiss (6:45am)
Officer Sue Barchlow (6:45am)
Priscilla White phones home (6:45am)
Reverend Rol Hoverstock (7:00am)
Burke taken to Whites (7:00am)
K-9 Unit on standby (7:33am)
Sgt. Paul Reichenbach mets Arndt
Det. Linda Arndt arrives (8:10am)
Det. Fred Patterson (8:10am)
Crime scene investigators dusting prints
JonBenet Bedroom sealed (10:30am)



------

IMO he didn't have the time to go to the basement
i think that's what Kane figured out as well.
he didn't go around 7 because that's when Burke left



-----------------------------



another lie

1997 interview

So I went back down with Fleet, we looked around for some glass again, still didn’t see any glass.


1998 interview

We got down on our hands and

15 knees looking for some glass just to see.

16 LOU SMIT: What did you find?

17 JOHN RAMSEY: I think we found a few fragments

18 of glass not enough to indicate that it was a

19 fresh break.

20 LOU SMIT: What did you do with those fragments?

21 JOHN RAMSEY: We might have put them on the

22 ledge, if I remember. It really wasn't much. We

23 had only found one or two. We might have put them

24 up here on the ledge.
--------------------




according to ST's book,FW went down to the basement between 6.30-6.45

it says FW found a piece of glass which he placed on the ledge
he drops to his knees ,searching for other pieces and moved the suitcase in doing so

---------------

6 JOHN RAMSEY: I think I moved it to see or

7 to look for glass then. But I think it was where I

8 left it, where it was when I was down there

9 before.

-------------------

how many times was the suitcase moved?









--------------------


ST: Well, let me follow up on this John. John I’m very sensitive to how tough this is, and you’ll appreciate that we need to get through this. On that trip to the basement, shortly after 1 p.m. on the 26th, Fleet showed you the window, the broken basement window.

JR: No, I, I think was the first one to enter the room.
ST: OK, but . . .

JR: I said, you know, this window’s broken, but I think I broke it last summer. It just hasn’t been fixed. And it was opened, but I closed it earlier and we got down on the floor and looked around for some glass just to be sure that it hadn’t been broken again.


-------------

I think FW was the one who pointed out to JR that the window was broken
 
  • #60
Best thread title ever.

Now more than ever does the evidence need to be followed.

Since you just bumped it I've only read this last page but I noticed you quoted part of that great exchange where John screws up the time regarding the ransom note. I think it was another gotcha moment that flew over LE's heads. IMO he was remembering a previous ransom note/time schedule and made a mistake. I bet he was kicking himself when he realized what he did and then breathed a sigh of relief when they moved on from it.

JR: I said, you know, this window’s broken, but I think I broke it last summer. It just hasn’t been fixed. And it was opened, but I closed it earlier and we got down on the floor and looked around for some glass just to be sure that it hadn’t been broken again.
Fleet had already done that, John.

What was your actual exchange with Fleet as you guys are down on the floor looking for glass?

Broken again?!? Dear Lord....

JOHN RAMSEY: I think I moved it to see or

7 to look for glass then. But I think it was where I

8 left it, where it was when I was down there

9 before.
That pesky suitcase.....the contents which are the elephant down in the hellhole.

Nobody wants to 'own' it.

We got down on our hands and

15 knees looking for some glass just to see.

16 LOU SMIT: What did you find?

17 JOHN RAMSEY: I think we found a few fragments

18 of glass not enough to indicate that it was a

19 fresh break.

20 LOU SMIT: What did you do with those fragments?

21 JOHN RAMSEY: We might have put them on the

22 ledge, if I remember. It really wasn't much. We

23 had only found one or two. We might have put them

24 up here on the ledge.
Fairly cunning. He makes sure to say "we" instead of "I".

Mary Lou Jedamus-Advocate (6:45am)
Grace Morlock-Advocate (6:45am)
Reverend Rol Hoverstock (7:00am)
These people never should've been allowed in the home.

Fleet White arrived (6:30am)
Priscilla White arrived (6:30am)
John Fernie arrived
Barbara Fernie arrived
These people should've been immediately removed.


There is agreement that JR might have gone to the basement before LE went through

I don't think there can be any doubt. If its RDI(and obviously it is), he knows where she's located before LE arrives. IMO this is true no matter which Ramsey is responsible. He's the man of the house, the one with the bank account to help keep them all out of jail.....he's in the loop.

Cant find it in the transcripts ATM but there's a moment where Patsy describes them running up/down stairs. This is before LE arrive obviously and if John is running downstairs, he's not running everywhere but the room her body is in.

In the offchance he didn't know before LE arrived, he certainly knew when he went off the grid and later admitted he was down in the basement during this time. What's he doing down there, playing checkers?

We'll assume that White did see the break, but perhaps had the same opinion of it as French - old break, nothing too unusual othewise.
I wouldn't assume that. Fleet was the only person taking notes and its probably because some things weren't adding up and he was figuring out what was going on.

It was the dead of winter. I have a hard time believing they wouldn't get an old window break fixed.


If there was no chair in front of the train room door, why would JR have lied to establish his movement of the chair?
The basement sequence makes no sense at all. IMO John is just making things up as he goes along. He also knows he's on the verge of exposing everything. He's aware that items in the basement have moved between the kidnapping phase and after her body was found....so he whips up Mr. phantom intruder man violating the laws of physics to move a chair. Even Smit of all people didn't buy this serving of hogwash.

Later when JR finds JonBenet in the wine-cellar, more or less right away, the alarm bells are ringing for FW.
It wasn't right away....it took seven hours for this event to occur. I also have a feeling his alarm bells were ringing the whole time.


There is very clearly evidence of staging a kidnapping, which would require intruders, then pushing the "inside" job theory (which technically still requires intruders, but of a different sort) then after LS lends his "help" JR is back to the intruder/kidnapper theory. The window closed contradicts the intruder theory as per LS's dog and pony show. The window open at least doesn't contradict the LS intruder theory. Hence, months later, the closed window is explained by JR as having been closed by himself - though of course he isn't sure just why he did this, or why he didn't mention it to officers/detectives on scene on the 26th.
Yeah Smit and John became a great tag team.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
2,223
Total visitors
2,360

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,445
Members
243,055
Latest member
michelle cathleen
Back
Top