RiveterRose
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2024
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 25
Hello,
Due to the craziness surrounding this case, I don't think it's a bad idea to go back to the drawing board on a couple of the suspects that were initially eliminated. I want to take a closer look at why they were eliminated in the first place, and if we feel like that was a correct conclusion to make. We all know that once, "solid alibis" can later come back to be bogus...
In my heart of hearts, I really don't think this case is unsolvable. I think it's going to take brand new perspectives, and possibly starting at square one by making no assumptions. I don't want to just talk about what we think... I want to talk about what we know, and if we truly know that information, or if it can be refuted.
My guess is that if we all created a list of top 6-10 suspects that we think could be involved, that the true perpetrator would likely be on that list...... or adjacent to an individual on it.
This person was clearly comfortable in the home, that much is abundantly clear to me. So it isn't a rando off of the street type of situation, which tells me.... THIS IS SOLVABLE!!!
My first question is a simple one:
Who had regular and familiar access with the home? Let's start there.
I wish there was a way we could compile all of the evidence on each individual in a separate location. This is only my second post on this website, so I am unfamiliar with the workings of it. If someone know's how to do that, please let me know.
Due to the craziness surrounding this case, I don't think it's a bad idea to go back to the drawing board on a couple of the suspects that were initially eliminated. I want to take a closer look at why they were eliminated in the first place, and if we feel like that was a correct conclusion to make. We all know that once, "solid alibis" can later come back to be bogus...
In my heart of hearts, I really don't think this case is unsolvable. I think it's going to take brand new perspectives, and possibly starting at square one by making no assumptions. I don't want to just talk about what we think... I want to talk about what we know, and if we truly know that information, or if it can be refuted.
My guess is that if we all created a list of top 6-10 suspects that we think could be involved, that the true perpetrator would likely be on that list...... or adjacent to an individual on it.
This person was clearly comfortable in the home, that much is abundantly clear to me. So it isn't a rando off of the street type of situation, which tells me.... THIS IS SOLVABLE!!!
My first question is a simple one:
Who had regular and familiar access with the home? Let's start there.
I wish there was a way we could compile all of the evidence on each individual in a separate location. This is only my second post on this website, so I am unfamiliar with the workings of it. If someone know's how to do that, please let me know.
