List of New and Old charges against Casey

Status
Not open for further replies.
If, as everyone speculates (and hopes), CA will eventually get charged with murder or a related charge then why are they bothering with all of these petty charges? Isn't this just a waste of their time?
 
the more charges the more pressure on her perhaps? How many checks did she forge? maybe the bank has separate counts from Amy? I really don't know how this works, if someone could explain the process TIA.
 
I double-checked this, thinking it had to be old news, but no.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, the state has formally filed 3 more charges against Casey based on the charges alleged in her arrest the other day.


http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-casey-anthony091908,0,2315872.story

this is being covered in this thread: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70826

and also please read my explanation here:http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2708112&postcount=128
 
I am sick of petty theft charges when we all know she killed her daughter while intentioned or not. I think the cops are so mad at her at this point, they are going for murder 1. They just can't prove it.
 
I know that each check is a separate charge, so it sounds like she wrote 13 checks. The sequence of arrests and filing charges does have me puzzled. The only thing that I can think of is that police arrest based on the investigation. So maybe when they were doing the investigation they found 13 checks but for some reason didn't think that 3 of them would qualify- maybe the checks weren't returned yet, or maybe they weren't sure if they were written by Casey or Amy. Or because there were questions on them, they may have wanted them reviewed by the prosecution before they took action on those three. After the arrest they would send their info to the prosecution for formal charges to be submitted to the court. When the prosecution reviewed the formal charges, they must have thought there was enough info to formally charge on the other 3.
 
Everyone is very Welcome! I understand everyone's confusion. As I have done this type of work for over 30 years, I feel that I can enlighten everyone on how the system works here in Florida.
 
I know that each check is a separate charge, so it sounds like she wrote 13 checks. The sequence of arrests and filing charges does have me puzzled. The only thing that I can think of is that police arrest based on the investigation. So maybe when they were doing the investigation they found 13 checks but for some reason didn't think that 3 of them would qualify- maybe the checks weren't returned yet, or maybe they weren't sure if they were written by Casey or Amy. Or because there were questions on them, they may have wanted them reviewed by the prosecution before they took action on those three. After the arrest they would send their info to the prosecution for formal charges to be submitted to the court. When the prosecution reviewed the formal charges, they must have thought there was enough info to formally charge on the other 3.

these are the charges that she has been arrested on. She didn't write 13 checks. Also, please read my explanation in my message with the link just above your message.



Updated as of 9/19/08

to date these are the charges that KC is charged with:
08-CF-0013331-O Filing Date: 7/8/2008
1) UTTERING FORGERY
2) FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
3) CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
4) UTTERING A FORGED CHECK
5) FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
6) CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
7) UTTERING A FORGED CHECK
8) FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
9) CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
10) UTTERING FORGED BILLS / NOTES
An Information has been filed as to the above listed charges (formally charging her)

08-CF-0013520-O Filing Date: 9/4/2008
UTTERING A FORGED CHECK
FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
Please note that on 9/11/08 these charges were closed and consolidate with 48-2008-CF-013331-O

08-CF-0013521-O Filing Date: 9/4/2008
UTTERING A FORGED CHECK
FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
Please note this case has also been closed and consolidated with 08-cf-13331

08-CF-0010925-O Filing Date: 7/16/2008
1) Cr-Neglect of a Child
2) False Report to Law Enforcement Officers
an Information has been filed for these charges

Date Booked: 09/15/2008 (todays new charges)
1) Uttering A Forged Check
2) Fraud. Use Of Personal Ident. Information
3)Petit Theft Of $100 Or More

08-CF-0014154-O Filing Date: 9/15/2008
1) UTTERING A FORGED CHECK
2) FRAUD. USE OF PERSONAL IDENT. INFORMATION
3) CR-PETIT THEFT OF $100 OR MORE
According to the Orlando Sentinel the State has filed an Information on these charges, however, the Clerk's system has not been updated.
__________________
Devorahhh

Not the Biblical Devorah, but a nice one just the same
 
If, as everyone speculates (and hopes), CA will eventually get charged with murder or a related charge then why are they bothering with all of these petty charges? Isn't this just a waste of their time?

well, if they can't get a conviction for a crime carrying a mandatory life/death sentence, then the more charges total, the better, in terms of the fact that most states allow a judge to order consecutive, rather than concurrent, sentences, so she'd sit in jail longer...
 
The e-check I believe was for ATT to pay her cell phone bill. That may be considered wire fraud which is a federal offense since it was over the internet, carrying it's own sentence of a maximum of 10 years, IIRC.

The stolen money from the grandparents nursing home fund may get classified into a federal offense since it was funds through the government with assisted living.

Doesn't look good for Little Miss Hollywood.

Are these charges still pending? I hope so!

They seem to be filing the minor charges first. I have a feeling its gonna get real serious REAL soon.
 
If, as everyone speculates (and hopes), CA will eventually get charged with murder or a related charge then why are they bothering with all of these petty charges? Isn't this just a waste of their time?

I hope that they eventually charge KC with murder or a related charge as well. BUT, they have no reason to be in a hurry - they have plenty of time to charge her for that crime - dotting their I's and crossing their T's if you will.

However, in the mean time, she committed an economic crime against Amy while she was in PR (as well as her own family - parents and g-parents). She deserves to have these charges brought against her as well, regardless if they are petty charges. I put myself in Amy's shoes, these economic crimes aren't petty to Amy given that KC cleared out Amy's account while she was gone.
 
I hope that they eventually charge KC with murder or a related charge as well. BUT, they have no reason to be in a hurry - they have plenty of time to charge her for that crime - dotting their I's and crossing their T's if you will.

However, in the mean time, she committed an economic crime against Amy while she was in PR (as well as her own family - parents and g-parents). She deserves to have these charges brought against her as well, regardless if they are petty charges. I put myself in Amy's shoes, these economic crimes aren't petty to Amy given that KC cleared out Amy's account while she was gone.

Thinking outload here. How come Casey's GRANDPARENTS'S haven;t charged her with theft? Good ness gracious. Stealing from your grandparents, money intended for granddad's nursing home. I guess only thing worse is doing God only knows to your baby.
 
I don't understand how that works. They arrest her on Monday, release her on Tuesday, file more charges today...but they were already covered by Monday's arrest so she doesn't have to be taken in again?

I think they are saying it stemmed from the same person's checks, but this is some more that came rolling in-perhaps? and maybe she WILL be arrested-wouldn't that be nice...
 
Thinking outload here. How come Casey's GRANDPARENTS'S haven;t charged her with theft? Good ness gracious. Stealing from your grandparents, money intended for granddad's nursing home. I guess only thing worse is doing God only knows to your baby.

In my own opinion, and the way LOTS of people feel in regards to immediate family is that most things like that are handled privately by the family and within the family. I am not so sure my OWN grandmother would not have made an exception in THIS case and filed on me anyhow...but a lot of folks do not engage the law in their "familial" crimes...just a fact of life. I would not have done this to MY grandmother though, so would not have had to worry about...
 
Didn't Cindy's brother say there was tension between Cindy and her mother (Casey's grandmother), because grandma wanted to press charges and Cindy tried to talk her out of it?

I can see Casey getting away with using the birthday check routing/account numbers to steal from her grandmother, but I think the state will be filing charges against her for stealing the checks attached to the nursing home account. In addition to the usual forgery/fraud charges, stealing those particular checks puts her in violation of the state laws against financial exploitation of the elderly.

Casey's days of getting arrested for crime after crime seem to be just beginning. It's as if she's now reaping the karma in one fell swoop for years of lying and ripping people off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
391
Total visitors
477

Forum statistics

Threads
626,873
Messages
18,534,766
Members
241,143
Latest member
marriediguanas
Back
Top