LIVE MSM COVERAGE on BABY LISA - 24 OCTOBER 2011

[Insomnia Momma]

The video of this blob is of such poor quality I don't think it can be enhanced much. So I am frankly amazed press is calling the blob a man-how do they know the blob isn't female?

I agree, you also can't tell if the "blob" is carrying anything either. Although, if those are woods they haven't searched that the "blob" came out of LE could search there.

This whole thing is such a cluster mess.

 

[jjenny]

I still want to know WTH this neighbor is that was drinking on the stoop with DB. Why is she either not being talked to or anything she says being released.

Police has not released much at all. I am sure they have talked to her extensively.

 

[Just K]

GMA-a bit more video of lawyer in the home. Shows a bit of the basement, master br and boys br. She also points out LE emptied the wine box to compare what was left to what was consumed. ok dokie then!

Right, but is that the same box or is it just a prop for this walk through?

 

[curiousc]

http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/23/us/missouri-missing-girl/?hpt=ju_c1
Surveillance video from night girl disappeared turned over to authorities

The station manager, Anuj Arora, said it's unusual to see anyone walking at that time of night in the region.

Arora, who shared the video with CNN on Sunday, said he also turned it over to authorities investigating Lisa's disappearance in hopes it will help in the search for the girl.

 

[jjenny]

I agree, you also can't tell if the "blob" is carrying either. Although, if those are woods they haven't searched that the "blob" came out of LE could search there.

This whole thing is such a cluster mess.

I don't think the blob is carrying anything. Its "hands" are swinging back and forth.

 

[CharlestonGal]

I don't see the hair cut & color as a big deal. If a jury thought nothing of FCA running around for 31 days partying, shopping & cooking for the boys, participating in hot body contests, renting videos, getting a tattoo, stealing money from friends, and sleeping with whoever would have her, I doubt a jury would think much of a simple haircut & color.

As long as DB maintains she got drunk with a friend and doesn't know what happened to Lisa, she's home free. Nowadays the jury is going to require video from three different angles of DB harming/killing Lisa and disposing of the body, DNA and fingerprints on the murder weapon, and seven impeccable eyewitnesses to the crime.

I don't think DB has a thing to worry about as long LE doesn't find Lisa's body and DB sticks to the basic story of, "I was drinking with a friend, got a little too drunk, and I don't know what happened after that."

 

[Sigh Sister]

Not sure where I read or heard it, but JI said he went to the neighbor's to see if Lisa was there.

Found it! Go to post #29 in the compare statements thread.

 

[Elley Mae]

I don't see the hair cut & color as a big deal. If a jury thought nothing of FCA running around for 31 days partying, shopping & cooking for the boys, participating in hot body contests, renting videos, getting a tattoo, stealing money from friends, and sleeping with whoever would have her, I doubt a jury would think much of a simple haircut & color.

As long as DB maintains she got drunk with a friend and doesn't know what happened to Lisa, she's home free. Nowadays the jury is going to require video from three different angles of DB harming/killing Lisa and disposing of the body, DNA and fingerprints on the murder weapon, and seven impeccable eyewitnesses to the crime.

I don't think DB has a thing to worry about as long LE doesn't find Lisa's body and DB sticks to the basic story of, "I was drinking with a friend, got a little too drunk, and I don't know what happened after that."

exactly!

 

[Lera213]

Somenoe plese refresh my memory. Was it disclosed if and which network was paying for WildBS?

I have no idea but I stopped watch ABC during the CA case. :floorlaugh:

 

[Lera213]

Right, but is that the same box or is it just a prop for this walk through?

If it is a prop wouldn't they be risking obstruction of justice or something? Falsifying evidence?

 

[matou]

Sorry, I need to go back a few days to ask a question. On Saturday night, Joe Tacopina was on Judge Jeanine on FOX at 9 pm. He stated a few things:

JI called 911 from his phone.
JI went across the street to the neighbour. WHY? Why not go the the house next door, where the person lives who was in his house with his kids to ask what happened? At this point, it's unclear to me if DB also ran out and went across the street as well. Judge J interrupts Joe while he's speaking. He mentions DB shaking on the floor (in her house?).

So why did JI go across the road? This is really bugging me.

OK I found the video of his statement: it's posted on Oct 23rd even though this interview occurred on Oct 22nd (Saturday). Listen to everything he says especially just before 3 minute mark. Judge J asks him whether DB called her cell phones and he explains a whole bunch of confusing stuff. JI called 911 at the neighbour's house with his own phone??? Really weird. Watch it.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/justi...sponds-to-cadaver-dog-hit/?playlist_id=163706

 

[Sigh Sister]

OK I found the video of his statement: it's posted on Oct 23rd even though this interview occurred on Oct 22nd (Saturday). Listen to everything he says especially just before 3 minute mark. Judge J asks him whether DB called her cell phones and he explains a whole bunch of confusing stuff. JI called 911 at the neighbour's house with his own phone??? Really weird. Watch it.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/justi...sponds-to-cadaver-dog-hit/?playlist_id=163706

Go to post #29 in the compare statements thread. An interview was transcribed and in that interview he says he went to the neighbor's to see if Lisa was there. Maybe when he found out that she wasn't there, he immediately called 911.

 

[illinialum]

I was just listening to a Kansas City morning talk show, and they played a sound clip from Tacopina, where he claims that cadaver dogs pick up on "any human decomposition," including toe clippings and baby poo.

I'm so frustrated because after playing the clip, it was immediately followed by a clip about the surveillance video, and there was no discussion about the validity of Tacopina's claim!!

After hearing Sarx and Oriah explain cadaver dogs, I know that <modsnip> assertion is wrong, but I'd bet the majority of the listeners don't know this, and may believe that the cadaver dog hit was discredited.

Grr...

 

[Kat]

Found it! Go to post #29 in the compare statements thread.

[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7273546&postcount=29"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - compare the parent's statements to media here[/ame]

There's your post SS.

SS and for anyone else who doesn't know. If you want to bring a post from another thread---each post has a number in the very upper right hand side.

So in this instance click on post number 29 and it will open in new window, copy URL and paste it into the post that you wish to make on another thread.

HTH someone in the future

 

[ExpectingUnicorns]

The "image" issue is a conundrum, isn't it? When I see the family grouped together I question the selection of the "sinister" shirt because he wasn't perceptive enough about the image he may be projecting. Is is right for me to then also critique DB because she (or someone around her) is aware of her desire to have a more agreeable presence?

Aside from that, I don't think anyone who posts here gives a hoot (Sorry, WOO) whether this family is rich, poor, smart, dumb, attractive or ugly and with or without fashion sense. I believe, even though the comments are about appearance, the real rub is that of priorities. . . .

Ummm, let's see, should I go talk with the police, take more LDTs until I can pass, search everywhere even if only on my own? Or should I research attorneys, select a couple and then get my hair fixed? :waitasec: :dunno:

If image is important to the family then they should realize people see a "whole picture" that includes the actions that are visible to them as well as what they look like. It could very well be that they are taking some actions to move this case forward that we don't know about. But if that's the case then that should be the part of the "image" that's corrected ~ before anyone's appearance is even in consideration.

Obviously :cow: !!!​

 

[Kat]

I was just listening to a Kansas City morning talk show, and they played a sound clip from Tacopina, where he claims that cadaver dogs pick up on "any human decomposition," including toe clippings and baby poo.

I'm so frustrated because after playing the clip, it was immediately followed by a clip about the surveillance video, and there was no discussion about the validity of Tacopina's claim!!

After hearing Sarx and Oriah explain cadaver dogs, I know that Taco's assertion is wrong, but I'd bet the majority of the listeners don't know this, and may believe that the cadaver dog hit was discredited.

Grr...

For real?

Toe nail clippings? Oh that's right up there with decomposing pizza in a trunk.

Someone needs to take him to task on that claim. JMHO

 

[Sigh Sister]

Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - compare the parent's statements to media here

There's your post SS.

SS and for anyone else who doesn't know. If you want to bring a post from another thread---each post has a number in the very upper right hand side.

So in this instance click on post number 29 and it will open in new window, copy URL and paste it into the post that you wish to make on another thread.

HTH someone in the future

Thank you!!

 

[LancelotLink]

As far as the wine box goes, we have no idea what was done or by whom.
The lawyer knows that LE is NOT talking, so she has free rein to throw out what ever she wants for public consumption. Also, she never said on the video that LE did anything. She plays word salad, allowing the viewer to infer her meaning and then take it away as fact.
She says, We believe what they did was they
drained out the wine that was left in the box so they could measure what was left and what she consumed.
Now, keep in mind this lawyer NEEDS for everyone to believe that DB was DRUNK. So drunk, she couldn't possibly have done anything to Lisa or cover up whatever happened to Lisa. Instead of asking why LE took or didn't take the wine, I ask Why is this lawyer wanting everyone to focus on the wine.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Well, tomorrow will be three weeks since Baby Lisa was reported missing. I don't think anyone is going to break now.

What I hope for now is an inditement, but which of the umpteen stories is LE going to go with? There have been so many. I just have to believe that LE/FBI has all kinds of evidence we don't know about.

As for the wine box on the stove; I hope LE left it there because if DB did, that is more evidence of child endangerment. You never leave anything like that on a stove with children in the home. BUT, who knows who actually put it there.

Even though we are expecting, hoping, and praying for a break in Baby Lisa's case, it is going to hit us like a ton of bricks when it happens. It always does. I hope today is the day!

MOO

 

[josie1986]

OK I found the video of his statement: it's posted on Oct 23rd even though this interview occurred on Oct 22nd (Saturday). Listen to everything he says especially just before 3 minute mark. Judge J asks him whether DB called her cell phones and he explains a whole bunch of confusing stuff. JI called 911 at the neighbour's house with his own phone??? Really weird. Watch it.

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/justi...sponds-to-cadaver-dog-hit/?playlist_id=163706

how can he say the decomp hit doesn't bother him in the slightest and it doesn't fit the timeline cause the neighbour was in the house with DB until 10.30 the night lisa disappeared....but how do we know she ACTUALLY seen lisa?

"with the 2 boys in the house there isn't a senario that could happen for decomposition to start" he said something along the lines of that......now i watched a video (cant remember where i seen it) but it was from an expert in decomp and HRD dogs and he stated that decomp can be detected by dogs almost right away....now i'd like to know where he is getting his "info" on HRD dogs.

i dont even know if i'm making sense :seeya: