- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 1,021
But the paintbrush handle was broken to supposedly make it 'more manageable'. That doesn't add up, since if the handle was only a prop, it wouldn't need 'management'.
Holdontoyourhat said:But the paintbrush handle was broken to supposedly make it 'more manageable'. That doesn't add up, since if the handle was only a prop, it wouldn't need 'management'.
Toltec said:What really gets my goat is the picture of the basement window that Smit uses in his powerpoint. He has a picture of the window wide open, then goes on to say the intruder came in through that window. The window was not open that wide but slightly ajar. John closed and latched that window around 11am when he went downstairs.
Thomas copied the case files because Smit and others were changing their statements so he decided to keep the files original.
SuperDave said:Maybe, Seeker, but I doubt the initial contract permitted him to keep evidence he developed.
I don't let ST and Hunter off the hook, either. But they weren't asked to return their caches and refused.
Yep, but he couldn't show his power point presentation until after they signed that additional agreement.SuperDave said:Well, he did go public with it.
Seeker said:Seriously, if they are going to release bits and pieces (BPD persons and the DA's office via current and ex-employees) then why don't they just release it all? It's not like the DA's office is actively working on this case anymore, and most likely never has. They just want to shelve it and hope it goes away. I've said this for years, Boulder just wants everyone to forget this case and have people only think of it as that "lovely little college town". :sick:
I totally agree. She can't be hurt anymore by anything, but her surviving family members can. IMO the DA's office there knows the Ramsey's have deep pockets and are never going to breathe a word that is unfavorable to a Ramsey, or a Paugh.SuperDave said:I agree. No point in keeping it secret now. Supposedly, the DA's office has not spent a dime on this since they hijacked the case back in 2002.
The way I look at it is this: if (notice I say if) Patsy did it, then there's no reason to keep the evidence she did a secret. She can't be hurt anymore. If she didn't, then releasing the file might help bring someone forward to say "I recognize this" or "I might know this person."
Seeker said:Go for it Dave, but I don't know if you'll find anything to use against him. Everyone at the time this came about complained, and loudly that this was just WRONG and could be not only unethical but illegal too. Nothing was done and it still went through. I don't know what the BPD's fear was, but Wood must have had something really damning against them in order to strongarm them into this "deal".
Holdontoyourhat: Re fibers on the tape from Patsy. Can you tell me how the fibers got on the tape if Patsy never touched the tape not even after JB was found. Are these airborne fibers that just follow Patsy around?Holdontoyourhat said:This is like saying David couldn't have killed Goliath because when found, his sling was too loose to throw the rock.
I asked him the same question once; he never answered.drema said:Holdontoyourhat: Are you in any way connected to the Ramsey family: like a member or a friend?
shiloh said:trying to make the intruder theory sound ridiculous.
Great site Camper. Thanks.Camper said:Here is another fantastic site for KNOTS. I am going to give my 3 pre teen grandsons a book on knots for Christmas and a piece of rope.
Will get one for me too, I can see some artistic adaptations for some thingies I do.
http://www.layhands.com/Knots/Knots_Decorative.htm
.