i read here a lot, and don't post much unless something really strikes me. I am not in an lp fanclub, nor do i post here to defend him. But even as an observer to the threads, the thing that stands out time after time is that every time lp's name is mentioned, the same few posters rush to "critic"ize him. It certainly comes off as snarky when people can't discuss anything he says or does, without the critics coming in to point out lp's failings, and to totally discount every thing he does.
We all are here for the same reason: To discuss and sleuth the case. Everyone here has lots to offer, and i am always thrilled with the insights from our great posters. But where is the harm if someone wants to admire the work lp has done in this case? Why should so many seem to want to invalidate their feelings?
Lp is certainly a lightning rod, and a polarizing figure. Let's discuss the case and his confidence without taking sides against each other here based on our feelings about one man.
Excellent Post......