LP's timeline

[Chilly Willy]

She must have been making the BIG bucks to pay a sitter that kind of money. I don't think they get that much around these here parts... Heck, seems like she was just working to pay the sitter if that was the case-I mean, let's face it, as a young woman with no experience who did not even graduate who had only been working for a short time, how did she happen into a $30,000.00 a year job, because if she was paying the sitter $1,600. monthly this alone totals to almost $19,000. a year-so unless she was making about 30 thousand, then her sitter was making far more than she was...It just isn't feasible...She is such a DUMB liar-her lies don't even add up mathematically! lol

Silly, Casey didn't have an imaginary $30,000 a year job. She had an imaginary $100,000 a year job. She also had an imaginary college degree and scads of imaginary money in the bank.

 

[MD MOMMY]

She must have been making the BIG bucks to pay a sitter that kind of money. I don't think they get that much around these here parts... Heck, seems like she was just working to pay the sitter if that was the case-I mean, let's face it, as a young woman with no experience who did not even graduate who had only been working for a short time, how did she happen into a $30,000.00 a year job, because if she was paying the sitter $1,600. monthly this alone totals to almost $19,000. a year-so unless she was making about 30 thousand, then her sitter was making far more than she was...It just isn't feasible...She is such a DUMB liar-her lies don't even add up mathematically! lol

Around here that is a bit on the higher end for a nanny and I'm up North smack dab between 2 large cities..rather pricey area. In FL everything is less expensive, income is averagely lower.. so that would be HIGH for a nanny there IMO, very high.

 

[LI_Mom]

She must have been making the BIG bucks to pay a sitter that kind of money. I don't think they get that much around these here parts... Heck, seems like she was just working to pay the sitter if that was the case-I mean, let's face it, as a young woman with no experience who did not even graduate who had only been working for a short time, how did she happen into a $30,000.00 a year job, because if she was paying the sitter $1,600. monthly this alone totals to almost $19,000. a year-so unless she was making about 30 thousand, then her sitter was making far more than she was...It just isn't feasible...She is such a DUMB liar-her lies don't even add up mathematically! lol

Oh brother! I hope she reported this on her taxes. hehe

 

[LI_Mom]

Silly, Casey didn't have an imaginary $30,000 a year job. She had an imaginary $100,000 a year job. She also had an imaginary college degree and scads of imaginary money in the bank.

LOL!!

If she was smart, she would have let her imaginary boss pick up the tab for child care.

 

[Chilly Willy]

This is the part that confuses me. Was it 2.6 days after she died...or she was in the trunk for 2.6 days?

The chemicals found in the air samples show 2.6 days of decomposition, meaning the body had been dead for no more than 2.6 days when it was removed from the trunk. Bodies emit different chemicals at various stages of the decomposition process. If Casey had been dead longer than 2.6 days and then put in the trunk, there would have been different chemicals found.

Does that help?

 

[Janis396]

Around here that is a bit on the higher end for a nanny and I'm up North smack dab between 2 large cities..rather pricey area. In FL everything is less expensive, income is averagely lower.. so that would be HIGH for a nanny there IMO, very high.

Not only that, Casey was supposely ALSO footing the bill for all the fun trips the nanny took Caylee on, which seemed to be about 3 or 4 a week!

 

[LI_Mom]

Not only that, Casey was supposely ALSO footing the bill for all the fun trips the nanny took Caylee on, which seemed to be about 3 or 4 a week!

No wonder Casey is suing the ungrateful ! lol

 

[Janis396]

No wonder Casey is suing the ungrateful ! lol

Touche'! :clap:

 

[rozey]

Casey was fired from universal on 4-24-06 as per the 400 pg docs, part 1.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1080375/0825-Casey-Anthony-Documents-released-part-1

 

[shadow of my mind]

If the stain was left in the trunk on the 18th, the forensics would have shown 9 days worth of decomp, not 2.6.

Is there anybody on this board that can read the report about the 2.6 days and make this clear. Someone with the correct background to accurately interpret it. I do not but to me it reads:

That the fluids from the body or the body itself that caused the stain found in the trunk came from a body that was decomposing for 2.6 days.

That to me means the body could have been in the trunk for up to 2.6 days before being disposed of
Or
The body had been somewhere else and then placed in the trunk at 2.6 days of being dead and disposed of right away.
Or
At 2.6 days the body is now contained in something that will not allow any additional gasses to escape into the trunk to change the level that shows 2.6 days of a dead body being in their
Or
What ever the body was in after being dead for 2.6 days leaked into the trunk whether the body had already been disposed of her was now in a container that would not allow any additional gasses to escape to change the level that shows 2.6 days of a dead body in the trunk and was still in the trunk.

The report does not say that the trunk only had a body in for any specific length of time. Just that the body itself or what leaked out of the body had been dead for 2.6 days at the last time it made contact with the trunk.

A body could have been in the trunk anytime before or after that and for however long but it would have to be in an airtight container so the levels of gases in the trunk would still only read 2.6 days because of the gases

 

[laura2007]

The chemicals found in the air samples show 2.6 days of decomposition, meaning the body had been dead for no more than 2.6 days when it was removed from the trunk. Bodies emit different chemicals at various stages of the decomposition process. If Casey had been dead longer than 2.6 days and then put in the trunk, there would have been different chemicals found.

Does that help?

Yes, thank you for explaining that.

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

As far as the "air" test from the body farm I believe that are inconclusive and here is why......

“The correlation between all the techniques, the comparison to what is known about the decomposition of human and animal remains, indications of early decomposition products and the presence of the five key major compounds associated with human decomposition (primarily the sulfur containing compounds) indicates that a portion of the total odor signature identified in the Florida vehicle trunk is consistent with a decompositional event that could be of human origin.”

“These results still do not rule out the remote possibility that an unusual variety of products or materials (not present in the trunk at the time of vehicle discovery) may have had some contribution to the overall chemical signature.”

 

[DotsEyes]

Back to LP's timeline. . .

Some have suggested that the body could have been in plastic bags that leaked. Fine, but it was still only 2.6 decomp days before it was removed. Unless it leaked on day 2.6 and then stopped leaking. Plastic bags leak, but they don't repair themselves.

Others suggest that the body (with or without bags) was then put into another leak proof container and toured around hot Orlando in the trunk for 9-11 days. I would like to know what hermetically-sealed container she used, because I know of nothing that will stand up to a combination of dead body plus closed trunk plus Florida heat.

No, the dumping was before Friday, June 20th. (Fusion night).

 

[Pondering Mind]

Casey was fired from universal on 4-24-06 as per the 400 pg docs, part 1.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1080375/0825-Casey-Anthony-Documents-released-part-1

Thanks SO MUCH for that! Even thinking about looking back through those docs gives me a headache! :blowkiss:

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

Here is LP's own words on NG....

PADILLA: She was gone in the wee hours -- excuse me?

GRACE: Hurry.

PADILLA: You mean hurry. 16th, on the 24th, the body has been packaged. When she went to the house on the 18th, she packaged it. There was only 2 1/2 days of decomposition in the trunk. After that the body was packaged and didn`t rip open until the 25th

 

[BondJamesBond]

Is there anybody on this board that can read the report about the 2.6 days and make this clear. Someone with the correct background to accurately interpret it. I do not but to me it reads:

That the fluids from the body or the body itself that caused the stain found in the trunk came from a body that was decomposing for 2.6 days.

That to me means the body could have been in the trunk for up to 2.6 days before being disposed of
Or
The body had been somewhere else and then placed in the trunk at 2.6 days of being dead and disposed of right away.
Or
At 2.6 days the body is now contained in something that will not allow any additional gasses to escape into the trunk to change the level that shows 2.6 days of a dead body being in their
Or
What ever the body was in after being dead for 2.6 days leaked into the trunk whether the body had already been disposed of her was now in a container that would not allow any additional gasses to escape to change the level that shows 2.6 days of a dead body in the trunk and was still in the trunk.

The report does not say that the trunk only had a body in for any specific length of time. Just that the body itself or what leaked out of the body had been dead for 2.6 days at the last time it made contact with the trunk.

A body could have been in the trunk anytime before or after that and for however long but it would have to be in an airtight container so the levels of gases in the trunk would still only read 2.6 days because of the gases

Long answers including some experts here: http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73752&highlight=trunk


Short answer from my understanding: Clock starts ticking @ t.o.d. The chemical signature of 2.6 days was left in the trunk of the Pontiac. The 2.6 days answer uses accumulated-degree-days to arrive at that figure, so the temperature history of the body, which depends on where it was (e.g. freezer, playhouse, trunk, etc.) affects this number + or -. No way of knowing if the body was encapuslated in a container/bags after whatever temperature history got it to the chemical signature of 2.6 days (noting that the 2.6 was arrived at using the approx. temperature inside the trunk for the duration of time elapsed since t.o.d.)

 

[deerpack2003]

What if the body was sitting at another location for the 2.6 days when she placed it in the trunk to be moved to its final location?

 

[BondJamesBond]

What if the body was sitting at another location for the 2.6 days when she placed it in the trunk to be moved to its final location?

Provided it was in, then out again very quickly...that's one (of many) possibilities.

 

[anastacia129]

I was never on board with the LP timeline. I think she got rid of her remains within a few days and never looked back.

I really wish they could search the landfill.

 

[AutomaticAuttie]

Example of the 2.6 days of decomp:

Killed on June 16th between 3:30 pm - 4:30 pm
Disposed on June 18th @ 4:30 am

equals 2.6 days of decomp