LYONS AUDIO TAPES and BS VIDEO GONE? Discussion with R HORNSBY here

[Soju]

The who doesn't matter, the content of the audio does.

Amen! If we're talking about justice for Caylee, the content speaks volumes. It's really an eye-opener on certain perceptions of justice.

 

[BeanE]

Snipped for space. BBM

Maybe I'm a bit slow, but when you say that Ms.Lyon's comments will never see the light of the courtroom, are you excluding jury selection? You seem to be saying two different things. Do you mean her comments will never make it into evidence at trial, but most certainly will be brought up in jury selection? Makes no sense to me.

Ms.Lyon to potential juror: "Have you ever heard me say that women prosecutors wear strap-ons and that I will do anything to win and jurors are stupid and that by definition, if you become a member of a death-qualified jury you are a killer?"

potential juror: "no".

Ms.Lyon: "your honor we'd like to have this person excluded on the basis that he/she has heard me say inflammatory things about myself and is thus unable to render an honest verdict based on the afacts of this case."

Huh? I seriously don't get it.

:floorlaugh:

 

[Snaz]

Thank you Snaz!
Even those who placed bar complaints against Baez didn't blog about it..
NO disrespect, but really who cares? How does this outing of audio tapes by whom benefit CAylee?
The who doesn't matter, the content of the audio does.

I agree that, ultimately, it doesn't really matter... I just believe that if Mr. Hornsby is going to accuse a person of something, he should show proof that he did, indeed, verify his accusations. Being a member of WS, I have slowly learned not to just take someone's word for what they state as fact. Sometimes what one states is not always accurate.

I, personally, am very glad that whoever provided these tapes to the public did so. They confirmed what I already suspected about Ms. Lyon.

 

[mydailyopinions]

I agree that, ultimately, it doesn't really matter... I just believe that if Mr. Hornsby is going to accuse a person of something, he should show proof that he did, indeed, verify his accusations. Being a member of WS, I have slowly learned not to just take someone's word for what they state as fact. Sometimes what one states is not always accurate.

I, personally, am very glad that whoever provided these tapes to the public did so. They confirmed what I already suspected about Ms. Lyon.

I agree.
Here, he is a poster, a websleuth member, and therefore must abide by the "laws" of this land, and that is to back up your accusations with proof..
No defense attorney status should be able to get him out of that one..

Please Mr. Hornsby, no rumors allowed. LOL:dance: LInks please!

 

[celticthyme]

FATHER WE THANK THEE

For flowers that bloom about our feet,
Father, we thank Thee,
For tender grass so fresh and sweet,
Father, we thank Thee,
For the song of bird and hum of bee,
For all things fair we hear or see,
Father in heaven, we thank Thee.

For blue of stream and blue of sky,
Father, we thank Thee,
For pleasant shade of branches high,
Father, we thank Thee,
For fragrant air and cooling breeze,
For beauty of the blooming trees,
Father in heaven we thank Thee.

For this new morning with its light,
Father, we thank Thee,
For rest and shelter of the night,
Father, we thank Thee,
For health and food, for love and friends,
For everything Thy goodness sends,
Father in heaven, we thank Thee.

RALPH WALDO EMERSON

 

[LFlorida]

Sounds as if he's whining. Why would they need to look for another attorney if they had their own legal analyst on staff?

Hi, RR. Long time no see.

Would you (or one of the other sleuths on this thread) be kind enough to save me a few minutes' hassle on the following question?

Has this person been vetted or his identity confirmed by Tricia? thx in advance.

[Mr. Hornsby, please understand, this is nothing personal. Just making sure I'm not buying anything based on face value. I'm kind of a professional skeptic about EVERYTHING anymore. btw - do you know off-hand if Judge S.S. has a sister named Sandra? tia]

 

[mydailyopinions]

Hope you don't mind my answering for RR
Tricia has confirmed Mr. Hornsby.
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4484631&postcount=216"]http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4484631&postcount=216[/ame]

 

[citygirl]

Mr Hornsby.....how do you know that BS is the leak?

 

[elementary]

Eh. I'd love to see the Lyongate tapes aired on Nancy Grace. I wonder what the issue is with not airing them.

 

[Jolynna]

Hi, RR. Long time no see.

Would you (or one of the other sleuths on this thread) be kind enough to save me a few minutes' hassle on the following question?

Has this person been vetted or his identity confirmed by Tricia? thx in advance.

[Mr. Hornsby, please understand, this is nothing personal. Just making sure I'm not buying anything based on face value. I'm kind of a professional skeptic about EVERYTHING anymore. btw - do you know off-hand if Judge S.S. has a sister named Sandra? tia]

BBM

Yes.

 

[rhornsby]

Eh. I'd love to see the Lyongate tapes aired on Nancy Grace. I wonder what the issue is with not airing them.

Lyongate Tapes - I'm sorry, but defense attorney aside, that is classic.

 

[ZsaZsa]

Eh. I'd love to see the Lyongate tapes aired on Nancy Grace. I wonder what the issue is with not airing them.

Just for once the 'Bombshell breaking news' might be accurate. :innocent:

 

[wenwe4]

I doubt Kathy Belich reveals her sources, even to Mr Sheaffer. Those recordings were 'out there' for public consumption; I viewed them and there was no warning that the material was not for distribution. Ms Lyons has just had a short sharp lesson in the power of the WWW- ie Never say anything in public that you do not want to see on You Tube.

I guess the DA's need to come up with a big red warning label stuck on their conference materials, you know something like:

WARNING:
1) Does not play well with others
2) Not for public consumption
3) Check your morals at the door
4) Enter at your own risk
5) Do not disturb

(feel free to add onto this list or create theme songs for the content of DP Defense Atty conference warning labels) Sorry I know ot but just couldn't resist. . . .

 

[RR0004]

Heck, Mr. Hornsby...if you're gonna go after anyone...it should be Geraldo. I don't think you'd get any flack about that.

 

[Tulessa]

I guess the DA's need to come up with a big red warning label stuck on their conference materials, you know something like:

WARNING:
1) Does not play well with others
2) Not for public consumption
3) Check your morals at the door
4) Enter at your own risk
5) Do not disturb

(feel free to add onto this list or create theme songs for the content of DP Defense Atty conference warning labels) Sorry I know ot but just couldn't resist. . . .

6) Bashing , women and Judges allowed.

 

[RR0004]

Thanks for the glimpse of what could happen during jury selection.

Although I may not agree with all you have said in your posts here, I sincerely appreciate your efforts. I am happy to have the opinions of someone who is much more knowledgeable about the law, as well as the legal environment in Orlando,than I am, made available in this forum. I do hope you keep posting.

And from what I've seen of some of this legal environment I am not overly impressed.

 

[msinformed]

Well, I will not reveal my source, but there are two ways my assertion will be verified.

First, to make a claim such as I did about not just another lawyer, but one who is a local television personality, I better be pretty confident I would survive any resulting defamation or libel suits. And let me just say this, I would love to place BS and Belich under oath in a deposition - so there will be no such suit forthcoming. I think their silence will be my answer. Because if he had accused me of what I accused him, well you all know the rest.

Second, I only said I was informed he was being given the option to resign or be expelled. So my money is on him no longer being a member after a month or so (enough time for him to save face and resign).

If I am wrong, well he will still be a member and at that that time and you can call me out. I am not worried.

p.s. And let's not forget that WFTV took down every trace of the information and BS is their employee; so if he dishonestly acquired it for them, they would be as liable for any resulting civil suits as BS.

On the other hand, if they had acquire it legitimately, do you really think they would "cave" to a bunch of defense lawyers?

This was the ONLY Casey Anthony story they have ever removed. They were pretty concerned and their statement allowed them an easy way to save face.

BBM

According to their member list online, he is NOT a member ........ you are.

Now, I know you have stated your name continues to be listed and your are NOT a member. So, are we to assume, Mr. Sheaffer is NOT on the member list, although he IS a member? :waitasec:

 

[cyberborg]

The ends justify the means.
Whoever obtained those videos did us a huge public service.

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

 

[Soju]

You and Ms. Lyons both know that Mr. Kronk had nothing to do with Caylee's demise. Whatever prior bad acts Mr. Kronk may have committed, he doesn't deserve being called a murderer, even by implication. I think you know that. I think Ms. Lyons knows that.
.

snipped with respect and BBM.

And I think a jury knows that.

 

[cyberborg]

[snip]
What you want me to say is that her comments were outrageous and that she is evil, etc. But I have been to these seminars and they are as much pep talks and war stories as they are actual informational speeches.

So she used graphic language to get her point across about the people she deals with. Her language and her blunt delivery is no different than the delivery of the people who express their disgust for the Anthony defense. You may not want to admit that, but it is true.

[snip]

Respectfully snipped by me.

WTH? You comment on AL's seminar content yet do not want to spend some time to listen to it? To me, before spending an hour or two on this WS forum commenting on it and the controversy maybe you should do some homework and research, spend 30 minutes or so and listen to the tape first?