This case must have been very difficult to bring to trial. The prosecution's star witness is a convicted criminal, admitted drug dealer who wanted to 'take care of AH himself' after he shot him and left him for dead. The defense has a client who was introduced to a potential jury pool as 'it's my 'honor' to introduce AH', appearing to be wrapped up in the celebrity and notoriety of someone who has been already convicted of one murder and now on trial for a double homicide. It almost sounds like a movie, but unfortunately it isn't, as there a two families waiting for justice in their loved ones death for nearly five years.
Then there is the trial as it is proceeding. In order to keep this trial date, the judge made a ruling that the CW would have to give a 48 hour notice to the sequence of witnesses, making the case not flow in a continual pattern as it usually would and making it harder to follow. They still have about a week for the remainder of their case, but they will have to address certain things like that gun...they found and tested a gun found in the trunk of a car, but had no fingerprints/DNA, but then AB says AH threw it out the window on the Mass pike after the murders on the way to BW's house. There was also mention of AH's brother 'may' be testifying...what could he bring to the prosecution's case?
The defense will start their case in about a week. It has been alluded that they will show that AB was the one who murdered these two Cape Verdean people who were part of a Cape Verdean gang, who then shot Bradley for killing their friends, as well as the corrupt Boston police who decided to frame AH. I think I have missed something else.
The defense wasn't allowed to show that Vevo tape of the shooting Bradley was involved in, nor was the prosecution allowed to bring in AH's murder conviction of Odin Lloyd. It's a shame that juries never get all the information.
Is there some doubt, probably. Is there enough to sway 12 jurors 'beyond a reasonable doubt'... I don't know. This trial is still far from over. It is up to these 12 jurors to decide the credibility of the witnesses along with their demeanor, as well as the demeanor of the defendant and all counsel on both sides.