I tend to think DeSalvo committed at least a majority of the murders attributed to him. The revelation in 2013 that DeSalvo's DNA matched old evidence in custody of the State was indeed interesting, and yet a tad perplexing.
After years of resistance by the state to test old evidence for Mary Sullivan, even after her family, and Richard DeSalvo teamed up to get it tested and sued the state back in the early 2000s, out of nowhere it seemed, the old case for Sullivan was quietly reopened. This was without either family's knowledge and the state said the DNA from the Sullivan murder in 1964 matched Albert DeSalvo. Ok, that's very nice the state finally decided to do something with that case after so long.
However, what's long bothered me about that 2013 project, if you will, is it's suddeness, and apparent secrecy beforehand. The State also said they had no more evidence from the other twelve murders, only Sullivan's, conveniently. I'd love to see the actual laboratory reports and such of just how it was performed.
What do you people make of this? The reopened Mary Sullivan case and the sudden revelations in 2013?