SOLVED MA - Jane Britton, 22, Harvard student, Cambridge, 7 Jan 1969

  • #781
Have a look here. Scroll through this document and look for the aforementioned individual. Here's here. So are a number of others associated with Jane's case.

http://rla.unc.edu/archives/LMSfiles/LMS%20Peabody%20Man.pdf


I hope that someone wakes up and takes a look at this forgotten cold case soon. It's solvable.
 
  • #782
Could some of the national park disappearances of young women be linked to them.

I didn't realize, for some reason, that research is conducted on these lands until I read about the disappearance of a geologist (a man, so not the same perpetrator, probably). Bringing in other linked cases besides Jane and Anne might give us more clues.

Wondering if you are referring to this list? Will include it on thread for missing in the area, Anne Abraham.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...abrador-August-6-1976&p=12480865#post12480865

March 16 2016
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nl-inuit-mmiw-1.3512896

A shocking number was revealed at meeting in St. John's Wednesday: more than 100 indigenous women and girls are estimated to have been murdered or gone missing in Newfoundland and Labrador.
 
  • #783
Have a look here. Scroll through this document and look for the aforementioned individual. Here's here. So are a number of others associated with Jane's case.

http://rla.unc.edu/archives/LMSfiles/LMS%20Peabody%20Man.pdf


I hope that someone wakes up and takes a look at this forgotten cold case soon. It's solvable.

What I meant was "present in Cambridge in January 1969," and for all that one hopes that was the case, there's no evidence that it was. Nobody kept tabs on whether a student was actually in the area, or not. Potentially there could be records of books signed out from the Peabody library (or returned), but I doubt those records are still available. I can't even remember the procedure, except that it was casual.

I'd love a resolution as much -- or more -- as anyone, but I'm not hopeful. Remember that I told Lt Joyce about the Anne Abraham incident, and he would have been in a position to investigate.

I don't see a way forward without having a look at Lt Joyce's notes and/or the murder book, and no one's made any progress there.
 
  • #784
Wondering if you are referring to this list? Will include it on thread for missing in the area, Anne Abraham.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...abrador-August-6-1976&p=12480865#post12480865

March 16 2016
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nl-inuit-mmiw-1.3512896

I meant women with more in common with Anne than a lot of these. But, they could be mixed in with some of these. It would be a small percentage who were there doing some sort of study.

It was the disappearance of the male geologist that got me thinking that a female archaeologist could also be doing a study in such lands. And her disappearance would be lost among the many, many disappearances that have occurred.

But, thank you.
 
  • #785
Anne Abraham's parents were convinced of foul play. They were they apparently unaware of the Jane Britton murder 6-1/2 years earlier. Mr. & Mrs. Abraham attempted an unsuccessful litigation against the Smithsonian to try to prevent other such tragedies However the Smithsonian was protected by a government regulations clause stating that even volunteers are employees and that the government agencies could not be held legally responsible for injury or death.

I would recommend any individuals who have knowledge of relevant disappearances and/or unsolved murders of geologists/archaeologists or their relatives or individuals that were near archaeological digs be posted on both the Jane Britton and Anne Abraham sites. I believe that authorities in both the US and Canada are aware of the WS information. I am cross-posting this on both Jane and Anne threads so it does not get stuck in jurisdictional silos.
 
  • #786
Posting randomly in thread after reading a bit. Very interesting that it didn't receive much attention. Nowadays it would be huge news. Makes me wonder what the investigation discovered and if anything was shushed up. Good on you for keeping it alive.
 
  • #787
  • #788
I, like many other posters reading this thread I'm sure, am trying to figure out who Don Mitchell suspects, so that I can see if there's anything else out there about them. (Since it seems to be that Don, Jane's brother, the writer who never published the book and the most invested LE all thought that this person could be involved, it strikes me as far more likely than the alternative possibilities mentioned in this thread.) In that vein, did anyone manage to find a list of Harvard archaeology faculty in 1969, so that folks can figure out who fits the clues he's given/who may have crossed paths with DP 8-10 years on? (I *totally* understand why the person isn't named in this thread by Don or anyone else who has figured it out and have no intention of naming them.)

Thanks so much to everyone who has contributed to this thread, btw.
 
  • #789
Bumping this photo, sad irony that Jane is the one lying down, imo.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=jane...UICCgC&biw=1366&bih=657#imgrc=Xq7U_4NT_mj2aM:

jane_b12.jpg
 
  • #790
Not sure if that was in response to my post, dotr? Don Mitchell specifically says his suspect never went on an excavation with Jane, so I take it that whoever it is is not in that photo.
 
  • #791
  • #792
Hi everyone. First time poster here - longer time lurker. I've spent hours researching what avenues we have, especially Don's lead. (And a *whole-hearted* thank you for bringing so much information to Jane's case and dispelling rumors.) I'd like to ask you a question about this person based on research I've been doing. Did this person work on the Chiapas Project or work under the famous Dr. V? I completely understand why you've chosen not to name this person; its good ethics after all. =)

Thank you for your time!
 
  • #793
Hi everyone. First time poster here - longer time lurker. I've spent hours researching what avenues we have, especially Don's lead. (And a *whole-hearted* thank you for bringing so much information to Jane's case and dispelling rumors.) I'd like to ask you a question about this person based on research I've been doing. Did this person work on the Chiapas Project or work with Dr. Evon Z. Vogt? I completely understand why you've chosen not to name this person; its good ethics after all. =)

Thank you for your time!

Welcome to Ws TinfoilYarmulke, great moniker!
 
  • #794
  • #795
No connection with Prof. V (probably no need to use just an initial there, though), or the Chiapas project, beyond that all the staff and students more or less knew each other. But to my knowledge, there was no research connection.

Welcome to the thread.
 
  • #796
I appreciate your response Don, thank you very much.

Darn! There goes that line of research.
 
  • #797
I'm glad that new people are showing up here.

I never meant to start what's on the verge of being a guessing game (TinfoilYarmulke, I know you weren't taking it that way). I haven't wanted to name the person I suspect, even though he's dead, because -- well, because of unanticipated consequences. The internet is a big place.

Let me give an example. I used to write regularly for an online publication called The Nervous Breakdown. In 2011, I wrote a piece that involved a car crash ( http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/dmitchell/2011/10/script-carrera/ ). It was a serious piece but in it I passed along an obscenity that was going around the small town where the crash happened, in 1961. How could I have known that 5 years later the daughter of the two people who died in the crash would read my piece? And yet she did, thus reading something obscene about the parents she never knew (she had been an infant at the time).

So here are enough clues so that identifying him should be easy. The Peabody Museum newsletters would make a good starting place.

-- Mesoamerican archaeologist
-- arrived at Harvard not long before the murder, having come from a Midwestern institution
-- left Harvard in 1971 to return to that same institution
-- died in October 1996

Keep in mind that this person was never named as a suspect, in public.

Also I can't think of a reason not to name the person who was writing the book. Certainly she was not involved in any way. I no longer know how to contact her, but her name is Delda White. She worked at Harvard at least for a time in the early-mid 1970s. I think that when she contacted me, she had left Harvard.
 
  • #798
I'm glad that new people are showing up here.

I never meant to start what's on the verge of being a guessing game (TinfoilYarmulke, I know you weren't taking it that way). I haven't wanted to name the person I suspect, even though he's dead, because -- well, because of unanticipated consequences. The internet is a big place.

Let me give an example. I used to write regularly for an online publication called The Nervous Breakdown. In 2011, I wrote a piece that involved a car crash ( http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/dmitchell/2011/10/script-carrera/ ). It was a serious piece but in it I passed along an obscenity that was going around the small town where the crash happened, in 1961. How could I have known that 5 years later the daughter of the two people who died in the crash would read my piece? And yet she did, thus reading something obscene about the parents she never knew (she had been an infant at the time).

So here are enough clues so that identifying him should be easy. The Peabody Museum newsletters would make a good starting place.

-- Mesoamerican archaeologist
-- arrived at Harvard not long before the murder, having come from a Midwestern institution
-- left Harvard in 1971 to return to that same institution
-- died in October 1996

Keep in mind that this person was never named as a suspect, in public.

Also I can't think of a reason not to name the person who was writing the book. Certainly she was not involved in any way. I no longer know how to contact her, but her name is Delda White. She worked at Harvard at least for a time in the early-mid 1970s. I think that when she contacted me, she had left Harvard.

Thanks, Don. So I actually did figure out the person (via your newsletters link -- thanks!), but was thrown by the 1999 date of death earlier in this thread, which I assume now was just a typo! Anyway, the obituary I found on him makes him sound like an incredibly unhappy/unsettled person. I can't wait to dig into sleuthing now.
 
  • #799
I guess the 1999 date was from me, and yes, it seems to have been an error.

This all happened a very long time ago, so I'm not going to beat myself up for having either compressed or expanded memory-time. His arrival at Harvard was in much closer proximity to the murder than I remembered. Earlier in the thread I alluded to an alcohol-fueled evening with him, Jane, and my then-wife. I couldn't really place that on a timeline, but unless he was in residence earlier, then that incident would have to have been in the fall of 1968. That surprised me. I was away all that summer, so it couldn't have been then.

I also wrongly believed that he continued on with his appointment for longer than it seems he really did.

If you find other beginning and ending dates, will you post them?
 
  • #800
Again, thank you for your insight Don and responding to questions. I was really hesitant to ask about Dr. Vogt or the Chiapas project for fear of it turning into a guessing game. I'm glad its not.

That being said, I think I found a beginning date in the Peabody Newsletter from Fall 1968. This matches what I found in his obit.

https://www.peabody.harvard.edu/files/News_Fall1968.pdf
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
2,450
Total visitors
2,531

Forum statistics

Threads
632,163
Messages
18,622,937
Members
243,041
Latest member
sawyerteam
Back
Top