MA MA - Joan Webster, 25, Logan Airport, Boston, 28 Nov 1981

  • #741
Joan is very fortunate Eve, to have you as her advocate. Through you, her spirit is kept alive and her name is in the public eye. If it wasn't for you posting on here towards justice for Joan, sadly I would not have known who Joan Webster was...
and how her young and innocent life was taken from her.
 
Last edited:
  • #742
I hope Eve, you are doing well.
What an emotional rollercoaster to manage! You have obviously made this a mission of yours and I cant imagine the toll it must take.
I have seen a few pics of Joan on the web because of this thread. It's nice to have a face with the name. Such a classic beautiful young girl :)
 
  • #743
Joan is very fortunate Eve, to have you as her advocate. Through you, her spirit is kept alive and her name is in the public eye. If it wasn't for you posting on here towards justice for Joan, sadly I would not have known who Joan Webster was...
and how her young and innocent life was taken from her.
I thank you,too, and admire you so much for taking this journey in search of justice for Joan. It must be such a heavy burden to know that the family you were part of would be capable of considering Joan expendable.I pray that you will be blessed for taking this on, and, please, stay safe.
 
  • #744
Hi Sweetluv and Lisette,

I really appreciate your interest in Joan and your kind words. You don't really know how strong you are until you are confronted with difficult situations. I will not stop telling the truth about what is in the source documents. Joan did not deserve this betrayal. She did not deserve to lose her life.

Knowledge is very empowering. But I have to also admit it has been very frightening and devastating for me. I am a strong supporter of law enforcement and good lawyers or prosecutors who remember the responsibility they are empowered with. Bad actors in the system hurt everyone except the real offenders. They create more victims. Truthful answers in Joan's case is as important today as it was almost 40 years ago.

Speaking for myself, family and loved ones impacted by such heinous crimes need truthful answers to cope with such tragedies. Just look at the number of threads on this site. In my opinion, most people trying to deal with such devastating loss don't want to be lied to even when the news is grim. Only truthful answers allow for genuine healing. It is my hope that my voice drawing attention to Joan's loss will spare some other person from the corruption that multiplies the pain.

I hope Joan, too, can rest in peace.
 
  • #745
When I try to describe the level of detail of the Webster family planning, sometimes people roll their eyes. I don't have an issue with organizing or being prepared, but sometimes with the Webster family, it became anal and obsessive control.

A reporter actually captured the Websters' attention to detail. The article appeared in the Harvard Crimson on October 15, 1982. The Websters held a press conference to increase the reward. They handed out photos of themselves for any outlet that did not have a photographer there. The photos showed them in the same attire they wore the day of the press conference. We didn't have cell phones with cameras in those days. It took advance preparation, quite a bit of preparation. The photos showed them even down to the same striped tie and pin that Eleanor wore.

Here is a link to the article:

The Nightmare Continues | News | The Harvard Crimson

Note: Eleanor told the reporter she cried. I never once saw George or Eleanor or Anne cry, not even in the private family moments. People handle grief differently, I never judged. I attributed their stoicism to their backgrounds. After recovering source documents and my personal experiences over the years, I view their behavior differently. The Websters were emotionally detached.

Note: So as not to be confused, Eleanor's nickname was Terry. That's what most people called her. In researching Joan's case, I learned Steve had made up a story how his mother got the nickname. He said Terry was a character name for the part his mother played in a civic production. He said his dad liked it and it stuck. In fact, George did not give Eleanor the nickname. In a tribute to Eleanor's first husband, Thomas Hardaway called her Terry. Hardaway was a West Point graduate who was killed in the Korean War.
 
  • #746
RIP Joan...your not forgotten!
Your in my thoughts too Eve!
 
  • #747
Hi Sweetluv,

Thank you for your kindness and remembering Joan. This is a very hard week. It's unbelievable it has now been 40 years. Digging through the records makes her loss seem like yesterday. Suspended grief is difficult to cope with and finding out what really was going on makes it even more painful.

I recently did an interview with Criminology Podcast. You can hear the program here.
https://player.fm/series/series-2409410/joan-webster
They played excerpts of my interview. I am working on getting the full interview.

The podcasters did some independent research on Joan's case. There are a few inaccuracies noted below. I am not surprised. The media reports had some inaccuracies that are hard to sort out without more knowledge or access to information. I don't think the inaccuracies are significant to the overall case. They did a good job. I do disagree with their conclusion that the case might never be solved. Learning who was lying and diverting the case is a major factor leading to the truth. The real question is will Joan ever receive justice for the malfeasance that took place. I plan to do more to set the record straight.

Inaccuracies:
1. Paradiso did not sell seafood to Conley and Daggets, the location where Marie Iannuzzi's body was found. The company was sold and renamed Atlantic Lobster. Paradiso did sell to them, but that was after the Iannuzzi murder.

2. None of the extortion incidents were ever made public, that is true, but the October 1982 extortionist was identified in records.

3. The verdict for Paradiso in the Iannuzzi case was July 22, 1984.

4. Paradiso was convicted for assault in the Constance Porter case, but the description of how Porter was found was inaccurate. The podcaster had multiple Paradiso accusers rolled into one, and some of the inaccurate reporting.

5. Paradiso died of bladder cancer, not testicular cancer.
 
  • #748
Thank you Eve for the link to the program. I plan to listen!
Sorry your having a difficult week...thoughts and prayers are with you.
 
  • #749
Eve,
Seasons Greetings to you and keeping Joan in remembrance!
 
  • #750
Happy New Year Eve!
I pray for Joan's justice in 2022...there is always hope!
 
  • #751
I am extremely sorry you and your family have had to endure this excruciating pain for as long as you have. Nobody deserves this. My name is Cori, I am 37 from Boston. I work as an advocate and I agree with you that this is a solvable case, I am not working on anything currently and it’s time for Joan to get the justice she deserves. I would like your blessing to investigate your sister in law’s case.


I want to introduce you to Joan Webster.

Joan was my sister-in-law. Her loss was devastating.

Joan was a student at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. She was in her 2nd year of a three year program with a bright future ahead of her. Joan was loved and valued by her classmates and peers. At 25, she had her whole life ahead of her.

On Saturday, November 28, 1981, Joan boarded Eastern flight 916 from Newark to Logan Airport in Boston. She returned early from a Thanksgiving break at the home of her parents in NJ. Joan arrived at Logan around 10:30 pm and was reportedly last seen at the luggage carousel. She planned to take a cab to her room at Perkins Hall. She never arrived.

A classmate notified the family on December 1, 1981, that Joan had not returned to class. Family members filed two missing person reports, one in Massachusetts, and one in New Jersey. On December 2, 1981, a clam digger found her purse and wallet in a marshy area that spanned on both sides of a split roadway, Route 107 also known as the Lynn Marsh Road.

An extensive search ensued and the media reported the story. According to contemporary news accounts, authorities allegedly recovered her suitcase at the Park Square Greyhound Bus Station in Boston, and held a major media event around the 1st week of February 1982.

Joan also carried a tote bag. The bag and contents, according to media accounts, were never recovered. The mysterious disappearance baffled everyone who knew her.

Joan's parents made themselves available to the media. They taped an appeal for information broadcast throughout New England on Christmas Day 1981. On January 19, 1982, they offered a $10,000 reward. The reward was increased up to $50,000 in October 1982.

On April 18, 1990, a veterinarian walking her dogs in Hamilton, MA discovered a human skull. The location was more than 30 miles north of the airport in a remote and heavily wooded area. Weather conditions in an area sometimes flooded caused the skull to come to the surface. After an extensive search of the area for the next week, searchers discovered the gravesite. Most of the remains were recovered.

The condition of Joan's remains, information I did not learn until 2009, were horrific. The cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head. She sustained a 2" x 4" hole on the right side of the skull. The blow, inflicted with tremendous force, took out the entire right side of her head. Joan was stripped of all clothing. No clothing or personal belongs were found in the area except a gold neck chain and a gold amethyst ring both found on the skeleton. Joan Webster was disposed in a black plastic trash bag and discarded in a basin often covered with water. The gravesite was covered with cut logs in the area. At some point, later in time, a second layer of logs was piled on the site. Joan was positively identified through dental records.

All the while Joan remained a missing person, this case received high visibility and sensational coverage. More than three decades later, the case is still the subject of a lot of speculation and public representations of the case. Personal experiences and factors learned many years later created an urgency to know what happened to Joan. The explanations did not add up and the case remains an open investigation today.

In 2006, I began to dig into the case. I did not have any idea what I would find and did not know what to expect. This has been a painful journey, but the answers are there. For those of you who have suffered the tragic loss of a loved one, you understand the suspended grief, the questions, and the need for answers to heal. For a long time, it was two steps forward and ten steps back. Trying to find information was trial and error until I gained better skills of researching a cold case.

This case is important on many levels. I will be posting here as often as I am able. I welcome all input as long as it is respectful. I have recovered thousands of pages of relevant documents in the case and have a clear understanding of the obstacles to justice. I have actual documents that I will post and explain the significance.

What I will say is the case is solvable. It took peeling back many layers. It is an ongoing process and it is up to those in positions of responsibility whether Joan will receive justice or not. All crimes have an answer. The answers are not always easy to find. The answers are always painful in such a loss. It has taken many sleepless nights and a 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 of tears to get to this point.

Please say a prayer for Joan, all of the victims impacted by this case, and others in pain after traumatic loss senselessly altered lives forever.



I want to introduce you to Joan Webster.

Joan was my sister-in-law. Her loss was devastating.

Joan was a student at the Harvard Graduate School of Design. She was in her 2nd year of a three year program with a bright future ahead of her. Joan was loved and valued by her classmates and peers. At 25, she had her whole life ahead of her.

On Saturday, November 28, 1981, Joan boarded Eastern flight 916 from Newark to Logan Airport in Boston. She returned early from a Thanksgiving break at the home of her parents in NJ. Joan arrived at Logan around 10:30 pm and was reportedly last seen at the luggage carousel. She planned to take a cab to her room at Perkins Hall. She never arrived.

A classmate notified the family on December 1, 1981, that Joan had not returned to class. Family members filed two missing person reports, one in Massachusetts, and one in New Jersey. On December 2, 1981, a clam digger found her purse and wallet in a marshy area that spanned on both sides of a split roadway, Route 107 also known as the Lynn Marsh Road.

An extensive search ensued and the media reported the story. According to contemporary news accounts, authorities allegedly recovered her suitcase at the Park Square Greyhound Bus Station in Boston, and held a major media event around the 1st week of February 1982.

Joan also carried a tote bag. The bag and contents, according to media accounts, were never recovered. The mysterious disappearance baffled everyone who knew her.

Joan's parents made themselves available to the media. They taped an appeal for information broadcast throughout New England on Christmas Day 1981. On January 19, 1982, they offered a $10,000 reward. The reward was increased up to $50,000 in October 1982.

On April 18, 1990, a veterinarian walking her dogs in Hamilton, MA discovered a human skull. The location was more than 30 miles north of the airport in a remote and heavily wooded area. Weather conditions in an area sometimes flooded caused the skull to come to the surface. After an extensive search of the area for the next week, searchers discovered the gravesite. Most of the remains were recovered.

The condition of Joan's remains, information I did not learn until 2009, were horrific. The cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head. She sustained a 2" x 4" hole on the right side of the skull. The blow, inflicted with tremendous force, took out the entire right side of her head. Joan was stripped of all clothing. No clothing or personal belongs were found in the area except a gold neck chain and a gold amethyst ring both found on the skeleton. Joan Webster was disposed in a black plastic trash bag and discarded in a basin often covered with water. The gravesite was covered with cut logs in the area. At some point, later in time, a second layer of logs was piled on the site. Joan was positively identified through dental records.

All the while Joan remained a missing person, this case received high visibility and sensational coverage. More than three decades later, the case is still the subject of a lot of speculation and public representations of the case. Personal experiences and factors learned many years later created an urgency to know what happened to Joan. The explanations did not add up and the case remains an open investigation today.

In 2006, I began to dig into the case. I did not have any idea what I would find and did not know what to expect. This has been a painful journey, but the answers are there. For those of you who have suffered the tragic loss of a loved one, you understand the suspended grief, the questions, and the need for answers to heal. For a long time, it was two steps forward and ten steps back. Trying to find information was trial and error until I gained better skills of researching a cold case.

This case is important on many levels. I will be posting here as often as I am able. I welcome all input as long as it is respectful. I have recovered thousands of pages of relevant documents in the case and have a clear understanding of the obstacles to justice. I have actual documents that I will post and explain the significance.

What I will say is the case is solvable. It took peeling back many layers. It is an ongoing process and it is up to those in positions of responsibility whether Joan will receive justice or not. All crimes have an answer. The answers are not always easy to find. The answers are always painful in such a loss. It has taken many sleepless nights and a 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 of tears to get to this point.

Please say a prayer for Joan, all of the victims impacted by this case, and others in pain after traumatic loss senselessly altered lives forever.
 
  • #752
Nice of you Cori to offer assistance to Eve in her fight to get justice for Joan.
Unfortunately, I haven't seen Eve on this thread since Thanksgiving. I hope she is doing well and returns soon!
 
  • #753
Hi Eve,

I hope you’ve been well, and that more rocks are turning over behind the scenes.

A question. You’ve repeatedly stated that Joan’s early return on Saturday was likely a result of George’s itinerary; to wit:

What makes the most sense is that Joan changed her plans to accommodate George. He travelled that weekend.

I’ve gotten hung up on this seemingly innocuous statement a hundred times, and finally figured it out.

Basically - How would Joan returning early accommodate George?

If she hadn’t flown back, she simply would have driven back with her sister. How did a flight that got in to Boston at 1030-ish pm make things (ie, his travel schedule) more convenient for George in New Jersey?

Did he need Anne for something the next day? In other words, did Joan fly back early, indirectly because Anne’s plans had also suddenly changed (due to George)?

Basically, I just don’t understand how or why this early return works in the context of it “making things easier for George.”

Didn’t Anne also live in Boston at the time? When (and how) did she return?
 
  • #754
Hi Cori, Sweetluv and Cenazoic,

I have been off the site for a while but am working proactively on a couple of things that I will be able to share before too long.

Cori, thank you so much for caring about Joan. Her case is solvable. The key for me was understanding what was going on during the investigation itself. It was a diversion. Knowing who knew what and when made a huge difference in an examination of what really happened. I welcome all help to bring this case to light.

Sweetluv, I am fine. I am currently rebuilding a website where I gathered information. I am reorganizing it and adding new information that helps clarify Joan's case. It will be a while before I can post it live. I am going back through thousands of pages of records. I want to lay things out in such a way that it helps the reader step logically through her case. To give you an example, I list the agencies, departments, or investigators involved in Joan's case. There are at least 26. That is an enormously complex group that actually hampered a path to the truth.

Cenazoic brings a very good question to light. No one ever looked at the family dynamics. This is a very patriarchal family. Everything centered around George's wishes. I could provide some personal experiences but won't get into that now unless someone thinks that would help. Suffice it to say, the Websters do not respect personal and healthy boundaries of others.

Anne lived in Boston at the time. She drove back to Boston on Sunday November 29, 1981. It would have been logical for Joan to ride back with her. George gave the excuse that Joan went back early to work on a class project. He actually contradicted a statement he had previously made to the media. Joan had completed her class project and presented it before the Thanksgiving break. There are no witness statements to support George's explanation. George is also quoted in the media that Joan spoke with a classmate that morning to confirm they had supplies. That is false. The phone records do not corroborate his story.

Joan had planned to have a guest that weekend, a "meet the parents" visit. I spoke to Joan Thanksgiving Day. The plans had not changed. I knew this person. Eleanor asked me if I had his phone number when she called to tell us Joan was missing three days later. Joan changed plans to go back early during the break.

I remember when Eleanor called, I felt awful for her being alone when the call came in from a classmate that Joan had not returned. George was travelling. My recollection was confirmed with a statement Eleanor made to the media.

Supposedly George had a business trip to CA. Looking at the timeline and the family habits, the trip does not make sense. First George was an executive who delegated. He did not like to be inconvenienced and would never have scheduled a business trip over the holiday weekend. Travelling to CA in 1981 was pretty much a full day trip. He had to leave sometime that weekend to arrive for meetings on Monday and return on Tuesday. There is no record I have been able to find when George made that trip. With a little deductive reasoning, it makes sense he travelled Saturday night, November 28, 1981. Eleanor and Anne would not have made the trip to drop Joan at the airport. Ordinarily, they would have gone home. George made the airport runs alone. Eleanor did not drive after dark. Anne would have been the one to drive home if they were dropping both George and Joan off at Newark.

Did George go to CA? Nothing verifies that. If he did, did he stop someplace else first? Don't know. What I find incredibly concerning is that George and Eleanor suppressed the eyewitness lead of the man seen leaving Logan with Joan. The description was definitely NOT Leonard Paradiso, the man they accused of murdering Joan. The eyewitness description more accurately described George Webster.

It is a matter of putting all of the little pieces together. Understanding the family dynamics was missing from the investigation of Joan's case. I never once saw George, Eleanor, or Anne cry. Steve cried only once when he had his wisdom teeth removed and he was under the influence of a sedative. Anne didn't even bother to show up when Joan was interred in 1990. Steve balked at going, but I insisted. The family is very emotionally disconnected which is unhealthy.
 
Last edited:
  • #755
Eve I am in awe of your tenacity. Blessings and strength to you.
 
  • #756
Hi Eve!
Glad your back....and still hard at work gathering and organizing information!
Just checking in and thinking of Joan.
 
  • #757
Does anyone have suggestions how to add an audio file? It is a conversation I had with Det. Paul Grant of the Hamilton PD on July 16, 2009. This was early on trying to get records so be mindful, I have gathered a lot more since that time. Grant makes it pretty clear that this was swept under the rug and those in charge, including the Websters, were not too interested in resolving Joan's case.
 
  • #758
  • #759
  • #760

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
1,626
Total visitors
1,790

Forum statistics

Threads
632,443
Messages
18,626,605
Members
243,152
Latest member
almost_amber
Back
Top