1:13:55
I'm not saying they're not qualified witnesses but it certainly shows some bias
I've turned over a lot less in this case than this
Another comment
Would be fair to say because you had a lot of nighttime visitability work your cases frequently involve pedestrians
Yes unfortunately there is a direct correlation between the time of day in pedestrian fatalities
statistically speaking most pedestrian fatalities occur during the evening and night hour
That would have been nice to have
So my specialty in the area of lighting and human factors results in a lot of my cases involving pedestrians
Pretty important stuff in this case…
And then he comments ….
If you don't want me to say this- that’s fine
That's fine
Shh, don't tell them
Have you qualified as an expert in court before
Yes I realized my testimony I said it 20 times when
many I've been qualified I miss interpreted the question my fault 11 trials seven depositions
Not sure if you want me to clear that up
I don't know if it was ever cleared up
And then a bill from ARCCA to the defense for $23,925
That's not tramble, that's not trial by ambush, that's getting duped
So I didn't know any of this, but I've tried a few cases
I've been around the federal court a little bit
I know how it works
Sometimes parties pick sides
creates an imbalance and unfairness and then it allows the ability of one side to use ghosts
they create Illusions and Shields and say something's there and something's happening a federal investigation and
this person and then this happens
I don't care if the ARCCA Witnesses testify at trial
I don't care about their opinions but I care that it's unfair
imbalanced and hidden and the Commonwealth like the defense is
entitled to Discovery so if they can produce the discovery I'd welcome ARCCA
