MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #801
Did Judge take the lunch break?
 
  • #802
Nicole Albert already testified to Chloe's previous bite incidents, how can that be an issue now?
 
  • #803
  • #804
So how can the judge sustain an objection from the prosecution about testimony of a physical altercation…… when the ‘revised or updated’ IIRC medical examiner report says that the injuries were not the result of a ‘fight’ or words to that effect? MOO
If it comes to it I can't wait for the appeal where conviction is overturned and the judge is reprimanded with consequences. Unbelievable
 
  • #805
  • #806
  • #807
  • #808
Light snow up until around 7am. All the heavy stuff started after JOK was found. IMO
true - but

1) we can see what snow was there at 6am and have undisputed testimony he was "covered." to me that doesn't mean no part of his body was potentially visible... but you know... he was pretty covered. things are usually shades of grey.
2) we can convert the precipitation data to approx. inches of snow.
3) a body doesn't need to be buried or completely covered in snow to be obscured to some degree. if you have the stomach, go check out Ukraine war footage for endless examples.
 
  • #809
Does the defense have at least 1 expert witness who will be allowed to testify that the injuries weren't from a car?
That’ll come from the experts hired by the FBI and DOJ. Honestly, even better bc neither of those guys are being paid by the defense.
 
  • #810
A hit by a car that results in no broken bones. Sure.

A hit by a car that results in no broken bones and no bruising but also causes those kind of head injuries. That's harder to believe.

Especially, if you recall, the commonwealth's theory of the collision is that his arm bore the full brunt of the weight of the SUV backing into him. Yet the only sign of the impact was those scratches.
Yes….. and IIRC the latest / most recent CW theory of the case was a glancing or ‘sideswipe’ strike to the arm of the victim? That sent him careening and jettisoned some many feet IIRC? And yet the testimony of last CW expert has no statements or position about the nature of injuries to the victim’s arm? Is that correct? SMH. MOO
 
  • #811
Dr Russell's degrees are certainly from higher educational institutions than **Checks notes, The American University of Antigua.
 
  • #812
We're back live.
 
  • #813
Probably stunned to actually hear from a true expert.
And one that makes sense and has good qualiications. No need for notes whilst her excellent credentials are established, shows confidence in the witness jmo
 
  • #814
true - but

1) we can see what snow was there at 6am and have undisputed testimony he was "covered." to me that doesn't mean no part of his body was potentially visible... but you know... he was pretty covered. things are usually shades of grey.
2) we can convert the precipitation data to approx. inches of snow.
3) a body doesn't need to be buried or completely covered in snow to be obscured to some degree. if you have the stomach, go check out Ukraine war footage for endless examples.
Very sure I have an accurate description of the snowfall and weather thanks to lally's repeated, never ending focus on the weather throughout this trial.
 
  • #815
Thank God objection overruled
 
  • #816
The CW's objection is overruled - the defense is to continue
 
  • #817
Here it comes..the dog bite theory!!

 
  • #818
  • #819
Did the defense ever ask the ME about writing that JO hadn’t been in a fight???
 
  • #820
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
1,588
Total visitors
1,667

Forum statistics

Threads
632,543
Messages
18,628,166
Members
243,191
Latest member
MrsFancyGoar
Back
Top