MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #761
  • #762
  • #763
  • #764
They're off in the ether, along with the 42 minutes of sallyport video.
42 minutes were not recorded/
It’s been repeatedly stated video surveillance is motion activated - no motion=no video

It’s therefore NOT MISSING & not floating around in the ether
 
  • #765
The defense and many of Reads supporters implied the CW had doctored / flipped the video to deliberately mislead the jurors
Problem is that the CW didn't say a word about the video being mirrored. They just let it fly. If they didn't know it was mirrored, they are still responsible for being "misleading". If they did know, then that's a whole 'nother problem for them, and the missing 42 minutes of video is the extremely large cherry on top of a huge scoop of shadiness.
IMO.
 
  • #766
How about instead of asking Bukhenik if Trooper Proctor touched the taillight we actually call *checks notes* Trooper Proctor to testify to that???
 
  • #767
  • #768
Problem is that the CW didn't say a word about the video being mirrored. They just let it fly. If they didn't know it was mirrored, they are still responsible for being "misleading". If they did know, then that's a whole 'nother problem for them, and the missing 42 minutes of video is the extremely large cherry on top of a huge scoop of shadiness.
IMO.
Evidence was presented in the way it was received

There isn’t MISSING VIDEO - that’s being disingenuous & misleading to claim that it is
 
  • #769
42 minutes were not recorded/
It’s been repeatedly stated video surveillance is motion activated - no motion=no video

It’s therefore NOT MISSING & not floating around in the ether

How is there video of people standing there and then suddenly they’re gone?? They wouldn’t need to use motion to leave the room? So they’re either wearing Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak or they are all Nightcrawler from the X-Men. JMO
 
  • #770
@JHall7news

Detective explains why he mistakenly informed the state medical examiner's office O'Keefe may have been struck and killed by a cocktail glass...He says he knew there were statements fromt he defendant saying "she hit him" and there was a broken glass at the scene...

...so he wanted ME to have the most updated information. Lally finished his redirect. Now Jackson is asking some more questions about how the Sgt got this info saying that Sgt Goode told him she hit him. Are there reports stating this? He doesn't believe so.



The next witness is...NOT Trooper Proctor. The wait continues. This is Dighton Police sgt Nicholas Barros, witness 56. He says Bill Read contacted Dighton PD via 911 -asking to get a ride to the Brockton Hospital to meet his daughter whose daughter's BF had died.

1718030280504.png
 
  • #771
  • #772
  • #773
Playing the video uninterrupted or in snippets took all the air out of the defense’s bull poop balloon -
 
  • #774
How is there video of people standing there and then suddenly they’re gone?? They wouldn’t need to use motion to leave the room? So they’re either wearing Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak or they are all Nightcrawler from the X-Men. JMO
Yeah, they just bampf!ed out of there. :rolleyes:
 
  • #775
The defense and many of Reads supporters implied the CW had doctored / flipped the video to deliberately mislead the jurors
I question why cw did not point out to jurors on direct initially that they were viewing the drivers side of the vehicle and not the passenger side. You cannot spin that imo, it is misleading. The whole focus is on that side of the car. CW is misleading by omission and then the later 'explanation' ofcourse utilises plausible deniability. Except not so plausible imo and here's hoping the jury are not that gullible. They will hopefully at least take note of the trust worthiness and directness of Lally. It's all on Lally imo not Buhkenic. moo
 
  • #776
cracked tail light only.
 
  • #777
Evidence was presented in the way it was received

There isn’t MISSING VIDEO - that’s being disingenuous & misleading to claim that it is
Presented the way it received, certainly, but without the explanation that the video was mirrored. Talk about disingenuous and misleading. If they didn't realize it, then they need to own up to it in front of the jurors. IMO.
 
  • #778
  • #779
  • #780
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
90
Guests online
1,458
Total visitors
1,548

Forum statistics

Threads
632,349
Messages
18,625,089
Members
243,099
Latest member
Snoopy7
Back
Top