• #401
U.S. District Court Chief Judge Denise Casper denied the motion Friday, three days after Farwell appeared before her for a hearing on the issue. It marked the first time Farwell, a former Stoughton police officer accused of killing Sandra Birchmore, a pregnant woman prosecutors say he sexually abused when she was a teen, had appeared since his arrest in August 2024.

Farwell’s lawyers sought to move the trial, scheduled for October, from federal court in Boston to Rhode Island. They claimed that extensive media coverage of Farwell’s case, particularly in The Boston Globe, made it impossible for the 40-year-old to get a fair trial in the Bay State.

But Casper disagreed, finding that the coverage didn’t meet the high standard of prejudice necessary to justify moving a trial.

“Even when viewed collectively, however, the Court does not agree with Farwell that the nature and volume of media coverage have risen to the level that would warrant a change of venue,” Casper wrote in a 17-page memorandum and order, noting that though much of the reporting relies on the government’s accusations against Farwell, it includes mention that he denies the claims.

“The Court notes that even the most evenhanded media coverage of criminal cases may still include inflammatory or salacious details, depending on the nature of the underlying allegations for the criminal charges,” Casper continued.

Casper also noted that more than five-and-a-half years will have gone by since the time of Birchmore’s death when Farwell’s trial begins in October. Birchmore was found dead in her Canton apartment in February 2021.

 
  • #402
In his request, Matthew Farwell, 40, denies killing Sandra Birchmore and asserts the two-count federal indictment against him is legally defective…

Farwell argues the indictment fails to meet the legal criteria for the crime of killing a witness because it does not allege there was “reasonable likelihood” that he took any action with the intent to stop anyone from providing information to federal law enforcement officials or federal judges, his lawyers wrote.

“To be clear, Mr. Farwell denies killing Ms. Birchmore; and the Government fails to properly allege that any killing was committed to prevent at least one relevant communication to a federal officer,” his lawyers wrote in court papers

 
Last edited:
  • #403
In his request, Matthew Farwell, 40, denies killing Sandra Birchmore and asserts the two-count federal indictment against him is legally defective…

Farwell argues the indictment fails to meet the legal criteria for the crime of killing a witness because it does not allege there was “reasonable likelihood” that he took any action with the intent to stop anyone from providing information to federal law enforcement officials or federal judges, his lawyers wrote.

“To be clear, Mr. Farwell denies killing Ms. Birchmore; and the Government fails to properly allege that any killing was committed to prevent at least one relevant communication to a federal officer,” his lawyers wrote in court papers

Another lying and corrupt cop close to Canton. Moo
 
  • #404
  • #405
  • #406

3/9/25

Chief United States District Judge Denise Casper denied Farwell’s motion, finding that the “superseding indictment is sufficiently specific” in the charges it lays out.

If he’s convicted as charged, Farwell faces a potential life sentence in prison; prosecutors elected not to seek the death penalty.
 
  • #407

3/9/26

Sandra Birchmore attorney speaks out​

 
  • #408
  • #409
Never a dull moment up there!!! Twin brother of Matthew Farwell was father of Sandra Birchmore’s unborn child, attorneys say - The Boston Globe

" The twin brother of the former Stoughton police detective accused of killing Sandra Birchmore was the father of Birchmore’s unborn child, defense attorneys said in court documents Thursday. "
This story has been pulled. Seems the defense made this false allegation in a Motion in error???

 
  • #410
  • #411

3/26/26

“These include, according to the government’s own evidence, Mr. Farwell’s brother who is a named defendant in the civil lawsuit as well as another individual who is the confirmed biological father of Ms. Birchmore’s fetus who has thus far not been publicly named,” the defense wrote.

Proposed conditions for his release include living with his mother and home confinement.

Farwell previously lost a bid to have the case moved out of state and a motion to dismiss the case.
 
  • #412
This story has been pulled. Seems the defense made this false allegation in a Motion in error???


Well that's odd isn't it? Wonder what Brother Farwell's wife thinks about all this? There's possibly more shady stuff going on in this case then in the Read and Fitzimmons cases combined!
 
  • #413
The earlier defense motion said the “government’s own evidence, Mr. Farwell’s brother who is a named defendant in the civil lawsuit as well as the confirmed biological father of Ms. Birchmore’s fetus who has thus far not been publicly named.”

The amended response clarifies that passage. It indicates that they are referring in that sentence to both William Farwell as well as another person who has not been identified.


The amended filing reads, “according to the government’s own evidence, Mr. Farwell’s brother who is a named defendant in the civil lawsuit, as well as another individual who is the confirmed biological father of Ms. Birchmore’s fetus who has thus far not been publicly named.”
Idk, it seems less like a false accusation by his brother’s attorneys and more like an error of bad writing to me.

And even with the update, Matthew Farwell’s attorneys refer to his brother as someone “who had ongoing affairs” with the victim. It’s not clear to me if those attorneys actually know the identity of the fetus’s father.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
1,884
Total visitors
1,937

Forum statistics

Threads
645,496
Messages
18,841,153
Members
245,689
Latest member
KCDFE1997
Top