MA MA - Sudbury, WhtFem #UP61560, <90, unresponsive + pronounced DOS in her house, natural causes, possibly named Natalie Eaton, Oct ‘19

EmiliaRT007

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2023
Messages
939
Reaction score
2,601
  • #1

On October 1, 2019, an elderly female was found unresponsive in her residence. The female was pronounced dead on the scene due to postmortem changes and decomposition.

She was white and estimated to be under the age of 90, so I’m guessing maybe in her seventies or eighties. She had gray hair and brown eyes. She was 5’3” (160 cm) and she weighed 98 pounds (44 kg) with decomposition.

The female was possibly named Natalie Eaton according to her Namus page. This name has not been verified. No foul play is suspected and the death appears to be of natural causes, which IMO makes sense due to her old age.
 
  • #2
  • #3
  • #4
Still in namus
 
  • #5
I am totally flabbergasted!!! I LIVE IN SUDBURY!!! How did I not know about this!!?? Now I am thinking due to
Covid and the town paper being discontinued, I missed seeing this. I check the local obituaries ALL THE TIME!! I will get in touch with my friends and neighbors in town and see if they have seen this. I have a feeling I know approximately where she might have lived. Need to check on this . RIP Natalie
 
  • #6
How strange. The NamUs page no longer mentions Natalie.

Natalie has a grave: Natalie J. Eaton (1927-2019) - Find a Grave...
Her estate sold her house: https://cdn.sudbury.ma.us/wp-conten.../HistoricalCommission_2021_May_18_minutes.pdf
Her nephew filed a motion to initiate probate proceedings without a death certificate. This document details how she was found. She couldn't be formally identified until her nephew had access to her medical records. Her death certificate was filed with the court in January 2020. I'm not sure why this is still listed as a Doe.
 

Attachments

  • #7
How strange. The NamUs page no longer mentions Natalie.
1000026717.jpg


It does
 
  • #8
  • #9
Thank you. I overlooked it because I thought it was in the description part. She was buried and formally ID'd almost five years ago. Is NamUs really that slow????
Yeah, I'm sorry but this is ridiculous. It's been half a decade, she is not a Jane Doe. NamUs needs to delete it.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
1,935
Total visitors
2,078

Forum statistics

Threads
632,296
Messages
18,624,416
Members
243,077
Latest member
someoneidk
Back
Top