Madeleine McCann 3 year old missing in Portugal - Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://tinyurl.com/yq5vha


"Dr Russell O’Brien. Clinical Pharmacology Course November 2003. Opiate Pharmacology. "

Opiates? Sedation?

Which ties into this:

Doctor Russel O' Brien suspecté by the PJ!

The newspaper “GROUND”, in its last number, advances that the PJ inquires as for the existence of a possible connection between Robert Murat and Russel O' Brien, one of the friends of the McCann couple. But the only connection element between the two men, found by the PJ, concentrates with the turn of a voyage accomplished by Murat with Exter - or life his/her sister - ten days before the disappearance of Madeleine. Village or also live the couple of doctors, Russel O' Brien and Jane Tanner.

The same newspaper advances that the personnel of Typed Bar would have seen only one person leaving the table of the group, the night of May 3, Doctor Russel O' Brien.

(rough translation, I know....from here: http://www.google.com/translate?u=h...ddie/maddie.html&langpair=fr|en&hl=en&ie=UTF8):waitasec:
 
And Jane Tanner is the one who claims to have seen a man carrying a child on her way to the restaurant?? Do I smell an unraveling here, finally? If Russell O'
Brien, Jane's husband, had something to do with this, it explains a LOT...everyone's silence...the trying desperately to pin this on Murat...the McCanns' reluctance to go to the places there had been sightings....it explains it ALL!!!!

I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing...O'Brien sedated the kids so they'd sleep and Madeleine had a fatal reaction to it....& the doctors, including the grieving parents, all must close ranks...just a theory, of course.
 
And Jane Tanner is the one who claims to have seen a man carrying a child on her way to the restaurant?? Do I smell an unraveling here, finally? If Russell O'
Brien, Jane's husband, had something to do with this, it explains a LOT...everyone's silence...the trying desperately to pin this on Murat...the McCanns' reluctance to go to the places there had been sightings....it explains it ALL!!!!

I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing...O'Brien sedated the kids so they'd sleep and Madeleine had a fatal reaction to it....& the doctors, including the grieving parents, all must close ranks...just a theory, of course.

OMG!:eek: That gave me a chill, bigger than the other theories along the way. What a thought.

You guys are on a MAJOR roll! Um, you better share this theory. Email people INVOLVED in this case. There is nothing to lose.
 
And Jane Tanner is the one who claims to have seen a man carrying a child on her way to the restaurant?? Do I smell an unraveling here, finally? If Russell O'
Brien, Jane's husband, had something to do with this, it explains a LOT...everyone's silence...the trying desperately to pin this on Murat...the McCanns' reluctance to go to the places there had been sightings....it explains it ALL!!!!

I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing...O'Brien sedated the kids so they'd sleep and Madeleine had a fatal reaction to it....& the doctors, including the grieving parents, all must close ranks...just a theory, of course.
That sounds very feasible, lets hope this is looked into by the P LE.
Great sleuthing englishleigh.
 
I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing...O'Brien sedated the kids so they'd sleep and Madeleine had a fatal reaction to it....& the doctors, including the grieving parents, all must close ranks...just a theory, of course.

Please tell me this just can not be. This is just so so horrible I can not fathom it as a possibility.

mjak
 
Please tell me this just can not be. This is just so so horrible I can not fathom it as a possibility.

mjak

I know...I have actually scared myself...I'm wondering if I should remove this theory, for legal reasons?
 
I know...I have actually scared myself...I'm wondering if I should remove this theory, for legal reasons?

I believe that stating "just a theory, of course" in your post would protect you from any legal action. I know that those "reports" mentioned on other forums have people spooked but, seriously, do you realize how much money...and effort....and time...would be required to bring any kind of lawsuit against one of us for voicing our opinions???

Plus...bring it on...my attorney would have lots of questions for anybody who felt like I had slandered or libeled them...:mad:

They would have to prove that they were innocent of any supposed "libelous" statements.

To put your mind at ease, just add a disclaimer in your signature that says: "my statements are only my opinion, nothing more".

Course, I am not a lawyer, even if that was my daddy's dream....
 
I believe that stating "just a theory, of course" in your post would protect you from any legal action. I know that those "reports" mentioned on other forums have people spooked but, seriously, do you realize how much money...and effort....and time...would be required to bring any kind of lawsuit against one of us for voicing our opinions???

Plus...bring it on...my attorney would have lots of questions for anybody who felt like I had slandered or libeled them...:mad:

They would have to prove that they were innocent of any supposed "libelous" statements.

To put your mind at ease, just add a disclaimer in your signature that says: "my statements are only my opinion, nothing more".

Course, I am not a lawyer, even if that was my daddy's dream....
Geez if I was worried about my opinions being used against me for legal reasons, I would be locked in the slammer and the key thrown away ages ago. Everything I have said here is my opinion only. There that should cover it.
 
And Jane Tanner is the one who claims to have seen a man carrying a child on her way to the restaurant?? Do I smell an unraveling here, finally? If Russell O'
Brien, Jane's husband, had something to do with this, it explains a LOT...everyone's silence...the trying desperately to pin this on Murat...the McCanns' reluctance to go to the places there had been sightings....it explains it ALL!!!!

I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing...O'Brien sedated the kids so they'd sleep and Madeleine had a fatal reaction to it....& the doctors, including the grieving parents, all must close ranks...just a theory, of course.

Good theory. Couple of follow up ideas...... if this is what happened, then everyone had to know from the beginning that KM would come running, they would all need to act surprised, participate in the search....

Of all the people searching during those initial few moments, who was "standing" around? Pretending to search, but not really because they knew they didn't need to? I think the P-LE should ask all the employees and others who participated in that first search this question. Did it appear that some were not really searching?

Its a lot of people to include in a "conspiracy." Is it possible that only a few knew.... and the others were not let in on the secret?

If RO was really a suspect, would they have let him return to the UK?
 
Excellent theory, leigh. Wasn't Russell O'Brien the member of the group who missed most of the meal at the Tapas restaurant that night? Geez, it just makes you wonder if there was something going on in the background and everyone else in the party covered and covered for him. JMO of course.
 
Excellent theory, leigh. Wasn't Russell O'Brien the member of the group who missed most of the meal at the Tapas restaurant that night? Geez, it just makes you wonder if there was something going on in the background and everyone else in the party covered and covered for him. JMO of course.
I believe the truth lies with the McCanns and their friends or some of them. I also believe there is a cover up. This to is only my opinion. I think the LE should focus more on the McCanns and their friends.
 
If true, it sure makes you wonder how this group of people carried it off without a hitch. Even after all this time, if something like this did happen, nobody has said boo. I also wonder if there were any resort employees who had dealings with the McCann party on a regular-enough basis to be able to tell us whether they were acting normal or not that night.
 
Gerry off to USA

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1276372,00.html

................snippet

Mr McCann will visit the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children to learn about techniques that might help find his daughter.
"We want to to work closely with the police and child welfare agencies in maintaining the profile of Madeleine's disappearance and other children's disappearances," the source said.
The NCMEC was set up in 1984 following the murder of six-year-old Adam Walsh.
He was abducted from a Florida shopping centre............snip


And Gerry is hoping for a visit with Laura Bush!!!
 
Ah yes, more publicity for his Fund. Will he tell us how to protect our children? Will he take information back to teach the police in Portugal how to search for Madeleine? Will he mention PayPal? Will he meet with Laura Bush, as he hopes to?
 
If true, it sure makes you wonder how this group of people carried it off without a hitch. Even after all this time, if something like this did happen, nobody has said boo. I also wonder if there were any resort employees who had dealings with the McCann party on a regular-enough basis to be able to tell us whether they were acting normal or not that night.


Here's another possibility?

Maybe there are other activities in their lives up to this point that they all keep secret within the group. Starts with one event or crime, they all keep it secret what he/she did to protect their friend. Then another does a crime of some sort and uses the "I didn't rat you out, you have to protect me now!" and another and so on, until the entire group has dirt on each other.

Snitch one out, the whole tower comes falling down so maybe they protect their friends to protect their past acts. Maybe now they're in over their heads and don't know how to get out of the tower without ruining their own lives in the process.

Maybe?
 
From Post 281, above.
The newspaper “GROUND”, in its last number, advances that the PJ inquires as for the existence of a possible connection between Robert Murat and Russel O' Brien, one of the friends of the McCann couple. But the only connection element between the two men, found by the PJ, concentrates with the turn of a voyage accomplished by Murat with Exter - or life his/her sister - ten days before the disappearance of Madeleine. Village or also live the couple of doctors, Russel O' Brien and Jane Tanner.

Does this say that Murat visited a village in Exeter, where his sister lives, about 10 days before Madeleine disappeared? And does it say that is also the same village lived in by O'Brien and Tanner? If so, verrrry strange.

And from a few weeks ago, probably meaningless, but still, a thing that makes you go, Hmmmmm:

The blogger at Gazeta Digital (Paulo) has asked:
Please: Somebody can tell me, the distance between LEICESTER CITY and SOME OF THE MAIN CITIES of South Yorkshire area, LIKE SHEFFIELD? Or/and send me a map where I can find the city of Leicester and the biggest cities of South Yorkshire? Same thing for the geographical position and distance from LEICESTER CITY TO NORTH EAST AREA (MAIN CITIES) and MANCHESTER. Thank you.Paulo Reis ([email protected])


However, for either of these two things to really mean anything, the solution to the disappearance would be truly horrific.
 
From Post 281, above.
The newspaper “GROUND”, in its last number, advances that the PJ inquires as for the existence of a possible connection between Robert Murat and Russel O' Brien, one of the friends of the McCann couple. But the only connection element between the two men, found by the PJ, concentrates with the turn of a voyage accomplished by Murat with Exter - or life his/her sister - ten days before the disappearance of Madeleine. Village or also live the couple of doctors, Russel O' Brien and Jane Tanner.

Does this say that Murat visited a village in Exeter, where his sister lives, about 10 days before Madeleine disappeared? And does it say that is also the same village lived in by O'Brien and Tanner? If so, verrrry strange.

And from a few weeks ago, probably meaningless, but still, a thing that makes you go, Hmmmmm:

The blogger at Gazeta Digital (Paulo) has asked:
Please: Somebody can tell me, the distance between LEICESTER CITY and SOME OF THE MAIN CITIES of South Yorkshire area, LIKE SHEFFIELD? Or/and send me a map where I can find the city of Leicester and the biggest cities of South Yorkshire? Same thing for the geographical position and distance from LEICESTER CITY TO NORTH EAST AREA (MAIN CITIES) and MANCHESTER. Thank you.Paulo Reis ([email protected])

However, for either of these two things to really mean anything, the solution to the disappearance would be truly horrific.

It sure would.

The direction things are turning is not good for Madie.
 
Excuse me for being ignorant, but I don't understand the questions about the cities near Leicester, Yorkshire and Manchester. What is the significance?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
843
Total visitors
944

Forum statistics

Threads
625,960
Messages
18,516,451
Members
240,906
Latest member
m23G
Back
Top