Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect - #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
Not unless he claims he sold her on? I have a feeling we could be told this, may or may not be the truth but better for him an abduction than a murder??

Not sure how well that defence would fly in court?
 
  • #162
From April 7, 2006 to December 21, 2006.
Xmas attempted abduction interesting. I wonder who else was in prison with CB?
 
  • #163
  • #164
From the McCann files. A time frame of the sexual assaults on other British youngsters inside apartments.
It's clear that somebody felt well comfortable entering these apartments and appears to be very active as opposed to it being a rare thing! But we know CB was in prison for some months in 2006 for diesel theft. Does anybody have the prison dates?
It makes my blood boil to know that this stuff was brushed under the carpet in order for unsuspecting families to still be holidaying there! X

This is very interesting but it still doesn't mean it was not CB who was involved in MM's disappearance.
1. It could have been opportunistic. I.e he went to burglar the apartment but took Madeleine instead.
2. He knew person B who did the crimes while he was in prison and knew that either "there was money in it" or was inspired by person B
 
  • #165
It was interesting skimming the olive press just how much petty burglary and crime there appeared to be

I think it is a mistake to assume the Algarve was a one man crime wave or that all the assaults are the work of one offender
 
  • #166
Perhaps this is the sort of ‘chair’ CB’s lawyer is referring to when talking about evidence uncovered.;)
 

Attachments

  • 7B4CC6AD-118F-438E-A632-8406EB9606D9.gif
    7B4CC6AD-118F-438E-A632-8406EB9606D9.gif
    197.8 KB · Views: 24
  • #167
CURIA - Documents
This the full text of the judgement. No English version as yet.
 
  • #168
Sky breaking news
The European court of justice has rejected an appeal by Christian B
 
  • #169
  • #170
  • #171
It's now available in 20 languages, but not in English...
Hi Mendel, just check the top of the link, there is an English version.
 
  • #172
So who could be paying for these uk solicitors???
 
  • #173
Hi Mendel, just check the top of the link, there is an English version.

There's English for the page, but not for the document as far as I can see.
 
  • #174
So who could be paying for these uk solicitors???

According to source report by Mirror it might be German taxpayers, but that's not officially assumed.
 
  • #175
Let's see if Herr Fülscher jumps from his chair today.

Too many things in a row.

Announced revelation. British lawyers team. Decision by CJEU.
 
Last edited:
  • #176
Christian B, serial pedo of small kids coming to live in a street, town or neighbourhood near you - sponsored and paid for by liberal EU politics and governments ;)
 
  • #177
Let's see if Herr Fülscher jumps from his chair today.

Too many things in a row.

Announced revelation. British lawyers team. Decision by CJEU.

I’m Australian so just out of interest - when FF-sourced stories hit the media in the UK/Germany, is it usually a morning, midday or evening story? Any consistency to the timing or just all over the place?
 
  • #178
It's usually around 8pm-10pm local time. Australians use to follow closely what's going on in Europe.
 
  • #179
Operation Grange is still investigating an abduction, BKA is investigating a murder.
This suggests BKA have shared no pics or evidence with OG or MC's.
This is what I don't understand.
The MC's have apparently received a letter that MM is dead.
So the MC's have to watch this soap opera until 2021 without word from BKA.
Why isn't OG investigating a murder?

JMO
They have said they cannot share the evidence. I don't know why - possibly lack of trust
 
  • #180
There's English for the page, but not for the document as far as I can see.


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber)

September 24, 2020 ( * )

"Submission for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework decision 2002/584 / JHA - Effect of surrender - Art. 27 - Possible prosecution for other criminal offenses - Principle of specialty"

In Case C-195/20 PPU

REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 21 April 2020, received at the Court on 8 May 2020, in the criminal proceedings against

XC,

Participant:

Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice,

he let

THE COURT (Fourth Chamber)

composed of M. Vilaras, President of the Chamber, S. Rodin (Rapporteur) and D. Šváby, K. Jürimäe and N. Piçarra, Judges,



Advocate General: M. Bobek,

Chancellor: D. Dittert, Head of Unit,

on the application of the referring court dated April 21, 2020, received by the Court on May 8, 2020, to subject the request for a preliminary ruling to the urgent procedure pursuant to Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice,

based on the decision of the Fourth Chamber of May 25, 2020 to grant this request,

on the basis of the written procedure and the oral hearing on July 16, 2020,

taking into account the explanations

- by XC, represented by lawyers M. Franzikowski and F. S. Fülscher,

- the Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice, represented by P. Frank and S. Heine as authorized representatives,

- the German government, represented by J. Möller, M. Hellmann and F. Halabi as Agents,

- Ireland, by J. Quaney, acting as Agents, and by M. Gray, QC,

- the European Commission, represented by S. Grünheid and R. Troosters as authorized agents,

after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 6 August 2020

the following

judgment

* Language of the case: German.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
2,220
Total visitors
2,273

Forum statistics

Threads
632,104
Messages
18,622,018
Members
243,019
Latest member
22kimba22
Back
Top