He used to be considered a top-cop......
Creep.
Here he suggests Burgau as MM's last destination: Ex-top cop breaks Madeleine McCann silence to say where he thinks she was taken
Burgau, being at three miles from pdl.
Remember FF's 6 km?
He used to be considered a top-cop......
When were sniffer dogs first used?Is that confirmed?
"At about 23.00 accompanied by a PJ inspector, the searches were begun. After Rex was given the girl's clothing to sniff, he began to search on the ground floor of block 5 and when he passed the door of apartment 5 A (the place the girl had disappeared from) according to his handler, officer Fernandes, the dog altered its behaviour, sniffing with greater intensity than he had done before. Apartment 5J of the same block was also checked as the dog had been more agitated than before as if there were a very strong strange odour there. It was stated that this apartment had been unoccupied for some time. Afterwards, the same kind of search was carried out using the dog Zarus which in general terms showed the same behaviour in the same places as Rex had done."
Documented Evidence - Page 5
When were sniffer dogs first used?Is that confirmed?
"At about 23.00 accompanied by a PJ inspector, the searches were begun. After Rex was given the girl's clothing to sniff, he began to search on the ground floor of block 5 and when he passed the door of apartment 5 A (the place the girl had disappeared from) according to his handler, officer Fernandes, the dog altered its behaviour, sniffing with greater intensity than he had done before. Apartment 5J of the same block was also checked as the dog had been more agitated than before as if there were a very strong strange odour there. It was stated that this apartment had been unoccupied for some time. Afterwards, the same kind of search was carried out using the dog Zarus which in general terms showed the same behaviour in the same places as Rex had done."
Documented Evidence - Page 5
Is that confirmed?
"At about 23.00 accompanied by a PJ inspector, the searches were begun. After Rex was given the girl's clothing to sniff, he began to search on the ground floor of block 5 and when he passed the door of apartment 5 A (the place the girl had disappeared from) according to his handler, officer Fernandes, the dog altered its behaviour, sniffing with greater intensity than he had done before. Apartment 5J of the same block was also checked as the dog had been more agitated than before as if there were a very strong strange odour there. It was stated that this apartment had been unoccupied for some time. Afterwards, the same kind of search was carried out using the dog Zarus which in general terms showed the same behaviour in the same places as Rex had done."
Documented Evidence - Page 5
He used to be considered a top-cop......
Creep.
Here he suggests Burgau as MM's last destination: Ex-top cop breaks Madeleine McCann silence to say where he thinks she was taken
Burgau, being at three miles from pdl.
Remember FF's 6 km?
Prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters says he believes Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner "relatively quickly killed the girl, possibly abused her and then killed her"
Madeleine McCann was killed soon after she was kidnapped, says German prosecutor
German prosecutors have already said they believe Madeleine is dead and they know how she was killed...
Even with the contamination of that crime scene, surely that scenario would have left at least some useful forensic evidence, some evidence of a struggle and enough noise to wake and distress the twins who were still fast asleep at 22.00. And why do that when quicker and easier to just grab MM.
I think a planned abduction and quick getaway is more likely.
It's here: P.J. POLICE FILES: ACTION WITH THE SEARCH TEAM OF GNRWhen were sniffer dogs first used?
This is probably a really daft question but surely there is a problem with tracker dogs in that MM would have been in and out of 5A constantly to the pool, the holiday club and the appts occupied by other members of the Tapas group. Including up to the time the family returned to the flat just hours before the abduction. Probably using the same path each time which would strengthen that particularly trail
How would a dog specifically track the path taken by the abductor with all that extraneous scent? Are they trained to look for the freshest or are the started at a point away from the last known place?
Secondly, and this is probably a really daft idea, is there a way to mask scents?
The concrete evidence could still be a photo in the scenario of her being killed in 5A, CB might have chosen to take photos of the corpse afterwards and maybe other sickening acts before diposing of her.Could indeed be, and I'm not at all saying this is not plausible just wondering then what the concrete evidence that she is dead could be? how would LE really know she is dead, we were thinking vid or pics etc, if he was a lone wolf why LE looking to find the Russian brothers, and again what was the job he had to do ? OMO
I hate saying this, but maybe the abuse happened after MM died on the apartment?If MM died in the apartment, why did HCW release the pictures of a that random room asking people to come forward if they recognised the interior?
I keep thinking of people referring to CB having 'a strong smell', whether that be weed, car mechanic stuff or other things....Apartment 5J:
Regarding the interest in 5J, the dog could have been 'conditioned' by the possible presence of people inside, along with a smell that it wanted to confirm at the cracks [gaps] around the door, it being understood from the signals it gave to the handler that it was trying to confirm the presence of the intended [hunted] scent.
P.J. POLICE FILES: ACTION WITH THE SEARCH TEAM OF GNR
So 5J was occupied at the time?
The second dog was submitted to the same operation, also showing interest at door of 5J, namely it scratched with it front paws at the veranda parapet and lifted its head to sniff the air to find a scent. As noted above, this interest was conditioned by various things, it being certain that the dog sensed a strong odour in that place and wanted to check that [if] he had found the intended scent there.
With respect, a planned burglary would not be a horrible job for a seasoned burglar, which CB was/is. It would just have been another grifting day for him.However, even if it was said as quoted, a planned burglary still fits the description of a horrible job.
I hate saying this, but maybe the abuse happened after MM died on the apartment?
I keep thinking of people referring to CB having 'a strong smell', whether that be weed, car mechanic stuff or other things....
My guess would be from whatever CB told HB. As per my earlier post, if they've been able to verify other parts of what HB claims CB told him as true, they would have confidence in his statement. And/or via a photograph/video. Even if it doesn't show the actual killing, the cause of death could be evident from a picture of the corpse. Just as an example, there could be obvious strangulation marks.From the link, I wonder how they know this (bib):
To him, possibly not. But to an non-criminal girlfriend, he might put it that way. It may even have just been bluster on his part. Perhaps there was no job and he was just making something up as he wanted to break up with her ("you wont see me for a while" was another apparent quote). We just don't know.With respect, a planned burglary would not be a horrible job for a seasoned burglar, which CB was/is. It would just be another grifting day for him.
I do agree with you though as regards the (un)reliability of this alleged comment CB's alleged to have made on the eve of the 3rd. It reeks a bit of possible opportunistic sensationalism which the tabloids thrive on.
Thanks for that.It's here: P.J. POLICE FILES: ACTION WITH THE SEARCH TEAM OF GNR
8 May 2007 at 23h45
But isn't it strange that a well-trained sniffer dog gets distracted by food? Once again it was the opinion of the GNR team that the dog was 'conditioned' by the small of the food remnants.
Perhaps there was no job and he was just making something up as he wanted to break up with her ("you wont see me for a while" was another apparent quote). We just don't know.
My question would be, if he really was planning some elaborate abduction of a child, why would he go alluding to it beforehand to an innocent party?
It's here: P.J. POLICE FILES: ACTION WITH THE SEARCH TEAM OF GNR
8 May 2007 at 23h45
But isn't it strange that a well-trained sniffer dog gets distracted by food? Once again it was the opinion of the GNR team that the dog was 'conditioned' by the small of the food remnants.