Maybe too much screen time for me today or I'm going mad(er), and not wanting to start another 'dog cushion' saga, but am I the only one that possibly sees a child wearing a light coloured shirt, head looking down, strapped into a child seat in this image? Look directly behind the driver seat.
I think the daughter statement is more accurate, as she hadn't been drinking and I'm thinking her eye sight is better,, and Ms said he wore glasses, but didn't have them on, there's a big difference in what ages they both said too"She also had a light top, with long sleeves"
P.J. POLICE FILES: MARTIN SMITH & FAMILY STATEMENTS
MM's PJ sleeves were short.
Yes - I think I may see what you mean, I've outlined what I'm looking at in blue. I think it could be a reflection of something else though - the perspective and size looks a bit wrong for it to be a child inside the vehicle. I can also see what looks like a person, perhaps a man in swimming trunks (outlined yellow), but again this could be a trick of the light. I know what you mean about screen time!
I have absolutely nothing to back this up but I have a hunch that the selfie published in Der Spiegel and shared on here by @SuperdadV8 where CB is giving the three-finger salute is from 3 May 2007 or early hours 4 May 2007. It’s now been deleted.
IMO the BKA (if they have not already done so) should re-assess the brit dog work as part of their CB investigation.
Or you might well adding 2+2 and getting 4. I've found CBs sudden dairy based protests interesting. He'd struck me as quite confident before.
Images suddenly being deleted are always interesting.
I felt HCW unintentionally revealed some of his hand in his conversation with the Aussie journo
The dogs, tannerman, smithman etc etc are of no relevance to his case. In fact he appeared not to know the details of those things.
This is how I see it
In the oz podcast HCW does not know whether it was the PJ or SY or the BKA which interviewed the Irish family. But could it be that HCW being IMO prosecutor (not head of investigation) is insulated from all the mechanics of the investigation itself, and is told only the broad results?Meaning?
You don't think CB was the person who removed MM from 5a and HCW is only looking at what happened after CB allegedly came into contact with her?
Interested to know your thoughts.
Agreed it appears to make no sense at all. But investigation is IMO to find what happened, and then make sense of it later. IMO some of the alerts by Eddie indicate temporary evidence concealment at the crimescene by an intruder, who if the BKA are correct is CB.Temporarily concealed? Why? For how long ? Does this mean blood was spilled?
This post prompted me to have another stab at this image's location so I spent today searching around CB's known locations on Google Earth/Maps, Youtube, Flickr ect.
The Hippy Market area in BSJ would be my best guess after what I've seen today. The area has all the elements as in the photos, reeds, same trees, earth colour, grassy verges. The only thing missing is the fencing. Also being one of CB's last known locations pre May 2007 gives the area a plus point. It could also be a million other places of course
Maybe too much screen time for me today or I'm going mad(er), and not wanting to start another 'dog cushion' saga, but am I the only one that possibly sees a child wearing a light coloured shirt, head looking down, strapped into a child seat in this image? Look directly behind the driver seat.
Another vague clue is that he parked at this location for probably at least 8 hrs?
Did you notice the scratch marks is the sand, CB's dog/s or a stray maybe? I was looking for CB's footprints to try and work out in which order the images were taken and noticed the scratches.
Credit @EPA
Maybe, but then again he seemed to know very little about the detail behind the signal from the mast, which you'd think would be very relevant to his case.The dogs, tannerman, smithman etc etc are of no relevance to his case. In fact he appeared not to know the details of those things.
A source close to the case said: ''(Christian B) hasn't been questioned yet in connection with the Madeleine inquiry as the evidence is still being gathered and checked but the idea is to wait until he is closer to where the team are based. ''A 640km round trip (400 miles) every week would waste a lot of time and resources and now we know he will be in prison until 2026 we know where he is and we can get to him easier.
''The feeling is though he won't say anything even when we do see him but at least it will make it easier.''