Thank you. I find these abbreviations challenging to say the least.
Takes a while to get used to them, it gets much easier, the longer you're here.
Thank you. I find these abbreviations challenging to say the least.
Do you think it will make much difference?
These people have a compulsion to do what they do and risk of being caught seems to be of little consideration.
quote=Davieson]Thank you. I find these abbreviations challenging to say the least.
OT - Websleuths abbreviations
Websleuths Lingo
OT - Websleuths abbreviations
Websleuths Lingo
Removing Subsoil Before Mining
It’s a podcast.So is just an audio book ?
Channel 5 bought the rights to premiere the doc, so it can't air in any other country until it has been broadcast in the UK first according to MWT. Still not seen any announcement from Channel 5 or MWT for a UK date and it's less than 2 weeks until the 3rd.Latest MWT doco about the case is going on air from may the 3rd.
AMC Crime emitirá en exclusiva la miniserie "Madeleine McCann: Principal sospechoso" - mundoplus.tv
Channel 5 bought the rights to premiere the doc, so it can't air in any other country until it has been broadcast in the UK first according to MWT. Still not seen any announcement from Channel 5 or MWT for a UK date and it's less than 2 weeks until the 3rd.
I think this potential airing date might well end up being canned like the German one was.
In theory, it would absolutely make sense for the UK premiere to coincide with the anniversary. That would be an ideal scheduling date for Channel 5, so will be interesting to see if we do see an announcement from them shortly, following suit. If not, it would suggest to me that there is still some external issue preventing its release. Will have to wait and see I guess.
I get where you're coming from and did consider that myself. The date could be seen as somewhat disrespectful, depending on the content/theme of the programme I suppose. But (like it or not) you do often see programmes being scheduled to coincide with anniversary dates of whatever subject they're covering.The content of the article seems a bit more interesting to me. Did MWT talked to panikspatz66 or another paedo? What did he reveal about the content of their communications. "MM" maybe?
And what did CB reveal to MWT "exclusive"?
To be honest, releasing this "bombshell" on the date of the disappearance seems pretty f***ed up to me. I hope, this case isn't turning into a worldwide media-j**k-off!
How disgusting...![]()
I get where you're coming from and did consider that myself. The date could be seen as somewhat disrespectful, depending on the content/theme of the programme I suppose. But (like it or not) you do often see programmes being scheduled to coincide with anniversary dates of whatever subject they're covering.
I'm just saying that "if" the reason for it not being broadcast yet is purely due to scheduling considerations (as some think), or they want to maximise the audience, airing it around the anniversary would make sense if there are no external restrictions.
I did notice this following article about a week ago where it mentioned that the production company "Drive" had sold a package of their documentaries to Spanish, Portuguese and Australian networks. The new MM doc is part of that package.
News round-up: AMC & Foxtel take Drive shows; Voot strengthens comedy offering; Banijay Germany forges influencer pact
But MWT has previously stated that Channel 5 were sold the rights for the premiere and so it cannot air in any other country before it airs in the UK. I can't see how this new deal would override that agreement, so unless we see an announcement from Channel 5 soon, my guess would be this airing in Spain/Portugal won't go ahead on the 3rd, just like the German one didn't. JMO.
As for what the "exclusive" revelation is, I think that is in reference to the alleged 'alibi' that CB has told him about. Yet despite how apparently outraged he is at being publicly accused, and fearing for his life in prison, neither he, nor his lawyers has bothered to tell the people investigating him about this alibi in order to clear his name. He tells an investigative journalist instead, one who has a bit of a reputation for going against the grain of police narrative and casting doubt on their conclusions. All seems rather fishy to me.....
One is that the people writing the programme reviews have not been allowed to watch the third episode, the one about the alleged alibi. Why would that be?
The other revelation, is it appears from the synopsis below that MWT didn't just write to CB, but also interviewed him in person.