Madeleine McCann: German prisoner identified as suspect #30

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
Have seen a snippet of info relating to SF TV programme from today that indicates SF believes NF knew some of childminding staff from OC , which would of course be interesting if true .
I don’t trust SF she just doing what journalist and trying to get the first scoop even if there is no scoop, but I do believe NF has a part to play in this. JMI
 
  • #182
2nd part of Investigação Sábado in CMTV, more questions to HCW, the same vague answers. Jutta Rabe in person being affirmative in the lack of concrete alibi from CB and reporting NF's negation and harshness in answering questions.

CB and NF, it seems so obvious...
 
  • #183
2nd part of Investigação Sábado in CMTV, more questions to HCW, the same vague answers. Jutta Rabe in person being affirmative in the lack of concrete alibi from CB and reporting NF's negation and harshness in answering questions.

CB and NF, it seems so obvious...
As far as I know, NF displayed no signs of sudden & unexplained wealth shortly after Madeleine disappeared - unlike CB, who reportedly did.
 
  • #184
On the Discovery+ documentary 28 mins into the 1st part the reporter interviews DF who says he was visiting his daughter in March or April 2007. The reporter then asks if he is absolutely sure he spoke to CB about hiding a child in his van in the Spring 2007. DF replies, "Absolutely, dead sure."
Now DF he is saying it might have been May.
I find it hard to believe that DF apparently can't remember if he visited the area before or after the 03 May. Maybe he was trying to keep NF out of the picture with his intial statements of March/April. Stating now that it could have been May puts NF in a bad light. I wonder what made him change his story?
 
  • #185
NF did not want to say if she called CB on May 3, 2007 with the 683 phone, or with another one.

HCW said they do not know who made the call from 683.

HCW said he cannot talk about witnesses.

Then?
 
  • #186
  • #187
2nd part of Investigação Sábado in CMTV, more questions to HCW, the same vague answers. Jutta Rabe in person being affirmative in the lack of concrete alibi from CB and reporting NF's negation and harshness in answering questions.

CB and NF, it seems so obvious...
Where can we see the second episode? I haven't been able to find a free link.
 
  • #188
As far as I know, NF displayed no signs of sudden & unexplained wealth shortly after Madeleine disappeared - unlike CB, who reportedly did.
Perhaps because she was already living kind of a wealthy life due to her very rich husband Mathias?
(according to Sexta9).
CB kind of lived as a clochard. More or less.
 
  • #189
  • #190
Perhaps because she was already living kind of a wealthy life due to her very rich husband Mathias?
(according to Sexta9).
CB kind of lived as a clochard. More or less.
A rich husband yet she had to go out to work and reportedly left the foster children on occasions in CB's care?
I thought that NF's husband MH returned to Messines in Dec 2007 and found the rented home full of new furniture, paid for with money NF couldn't account for. (Proceeds of the Nov burglary?)
 
  • #191
A rich husband yet she had to go out to work and reportedly left the foster children on occasions in CB's care?
I thought that NF's husband MH returned to Messines in Dec 2007 and found the rented home full of new furniture, paid for with money NF couldn't account for. (Proceeds of the Nov burglary?)
It sounds like NF wasn't exactly struggling for money prior to the €100k robbery in November 2007 either though. NF worked for the family for 6 months (which incidentally started around the time of MM's disappearance) looking after their 2 yr old daughter who had learning difficulties and running the girl (and sometimes her family) around in her car. Despite the family advertising it as a paid job, she turned up and offered to do it all for free effectively, only charging them for her fuel money. All a bit suspicious IMO. Where was she taking that girl on her own? Why did the family have €100k of cash in a bag in their house?
 
Last edited:
  • #192
From the short video clip in that link you can easily make a prediction what story the tabloids will be running next to replace the fibres one.
Did you predict correctly? The latest "news" installment based on things HCW didn't say...

 
Last edited:
  • #193
A rich husband yet she had to go out to work and reportedly left the foster children on occasions in CB's care?
I thought that NF's husband MH returned to Messines in Dec 2007 and found the rented home full of new furniture, paid for with money NF couldn't account for. (Proceeds of the Nov burglary?)
I have the impression that NF went out to work as part of her socialising and network activities.
Making acquaintances as a dogsitter or babysitter on one side, while on the other she befriended the rich at the casino and at the yacht marina.
 
  • #194

Did you predict correctly? The latest "news" installment based on things HCW didn't say...

‘We are sure Christian B killed MM’ HCW
‘We have only 1 suspect, Christian B’ HCW

This is all tabloids doing what they always do, creating a story out of nothing. HCW is just blowing SF off in these interviews. She’s a pretty good interviewer because she asks pressing questions, but as has always been the case with HCW, he’s not going to give much of an indication of their evidence.
I think his press interviews have become pointless but perhaps they see it as part of his role or attempt to ramp up the pressure on CB, call him out & shut down any nonsense about alibis
 
  • #195


‘We are sure Christian B killed MM’ HCW
‘We have only 1 suspect, Christian B’ HCW

This is all tabloids doing what they always do, creating a story out of nothing. HCW is just blowing SF off in these interviews. She’s a pretty good interviewer because she asks pressing questions, but as has always been the case with HCW, he’s not going to give much of an indication of their evidence.
I think his press interviews have become pointless but perhaps they see it as part of his role or attempt to ramp up the pressure on CB, call him out & shut down any nonsense about alibis
I agree- he cannot avoid giving interviews. He has to, actually, as the main press person (speaker) of the BKA in Braunschweig. He just wants to show that the case is moving forwards indeed - but he will not share details. NF is not a person of interest for the MM case, according to HCW.
 
  • #196
The SÁBADO Investigation had access to the alleged alibi that Christian Bruckner presented to prove that he was not responsible for the disappearance of Maddeleine McCann, but that he does not exonerate him. The alibi is a German named Anna Lena Einhart who was arrested for possession of a prohibited weapon at Faro airport, six days after Madeleine disappeared.

Bruckner's lawyer has been trying - for two years - to convince several journalists that Bruckner was with her at the time of her disappearance, but the court case, to which we had exclusive access, only demonstrates that Bruckner served as Ana Lena's translator during the judicial interrogation to which was submitted on May 9, 2007.

But Bruckner guarantees that on the night of May 3, 2007, the night of the disappearance of the English child, he was having sex in the caravan with a German woman, near Faro. The SATURDAY Investigation tracked her down, but never located her. We did find a process that connects both on May 9, six days after the disappearance. She tried to board with pepper spray at Faro airport en route to Germany. The translator during the judicial interrogation was Christian Bruckner, as is well documented in the process to which SÁBADO had access, having given a German address.

Jutta Rabe, investigative journalist was never convinced by Bruckner's arguments. "I wrote to him and he wrote me long letters and he claims he was a drug dealer at the time and I said, 'So you must have witnesses, you can tell places where you were and where you were on those days, May 2, May 3, May, 4th of May' and he said he was traveling between Spain and Portugal and I said to him: 'Then give me names. I was with a friend, give me names. Were you with a friend?' And he said yes. And I said I would check everything he told me, but he never gave me details."



The second part of the HCW video interview is shown in the attached link (you can sign up for free).

 
Last edited:
  • #197
I agree- he cannot avoid giving interviews. He has to, actually, as the main press person (speaker) of the BKA in Braunschweig. He just wants to show that the case is moving forwards indeed - but he will not share details. NF is not a person of interest for the MM case, according to HCW.

But why can he not just confine his briefings and 'updates' to official BKA press conferences? Why does he need to go to (and indulge) the tabloids and the likes of SF, knowing full well his words (or more specifically, lack of words) will be twisted into titillating tornadoes of speculation and untruths as per what we've just seen this last week? He doesn't, is the answer.

He could do an official briefing once a month. That's all anyone should expect of him.

On a separate unconnected note, I'm really liking the WS upgrade! :cool:
 
Last edited:
  • #198
Well... in a way he is doing his work! SF is one of the most well known investigative journalists in Portugal - he is right in choosing to give an inteview to her. He will reach a much larger audience.

And he doesn't have anything significantly new to say which would necessitate a briefing in a BKA press conference. There is interest in the media and he is rightly reacting to invites. It is his job to respond to media invites and queries. Sometimes he does not comment, sometimes he does.
We are just repeating ourselves here.
Even if he gave press conferences the same reporters from tabloids would twist his words and there would be the same speculations surfacing and appearing in the first pages of DM and the like.

Nothing he would do would satisfy all. Jmo

But why can he not just confine his briefings and 'updates' to official BKA press conferences? Why does he need to go to (and indulge) the tabloids and the likes of SF, knowing full well his words (or more specifically, lack of words) will be twisted into titillating tornadoes of speculation and untruths as per what we've just seen this last week? He doesn't, is the answer.

He could do an official briefing once a month. That's all anyone should expect of him.

On a separate unconnected note, I'm really liking the WS upgrade! :cool:
 
  • #199
Describing CB? (Salema)

"An individual of white race, dark skinned, with several signals all over the body, blond hair, short, without beard, little hair, about 1.80 / 1.85 in height, 20 / 30 years old, with 4 teeth up out..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #200
What do you mean? CB and FF have the case files for the beach sexual abuse so the case has already progressed much if this is what you are referring to?
Describing CB? (Salema)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
1,449
Total visitors
1,589

Forum statistics

Threads
632,394
Messages
18,625,775
Members
243,133
Latest member
nikkisanchez
Back
Top