None of the above.Who do you want to pay attention to?
Amaral?
Almeida?
Grime?
How about waiting for official attributed statements from the German judiciary ?
None of the above.Who do you want to pay attention to?
Amaral?
Almeida?
Grime?
Some surmised Clarke of the Olive press had his ear .
Wolters said to the camera on Ch5 back in May CB could not be placed in Luz on 3/05/2007 so that doesn't fit.My guess would be that Herr Wolters has proved, to his full satisfaction, that Brueckner was in the vicinity of the crime at the time the crime was committed, but he can't directly pin Brueckner to apartment 5a.
If that's right, then it would boil down to a question of whether you accord Brueckner technical benefit of the doubt that it is possible more than one person was in the vicinity with identical proclivities and leanings, and the other one, not him, took Madeleine.
Or whether you regard that as sufficiently compelling to convict.
A lot can change in 4 monthsWolters said to the camera on Ch5 back in May CB could not be placed in Luz on 3/05/2007 so that doesn't fit.
Agreed, but will it?A lot can change in 4 months
Indeed ,which Wolters latest shows with little chance of an indictment.A lot can change in 4 months
So there has been RM who was an official and SM linked to him. Then the three burglars identified by OG from the phone records. Then there were 600 names of possible paedos in the files. Many names from Clement Freud to Martin Ney have been put forward.My guess would be that Herr Wolters has proved, to his full satisfaction, that Brueckner was in the vicinity of the crime at the time the crime was committed, but he can't directly pin Brueckner to apartment 5a.
If that's right, then it would boil down to a question of whether you accord Brueckner technical benefit of the doubt that it is possible more than one person was in the vicinity with identical proclivities and leanings, and the other one, not him, took Madeleine.
Or whether you regard that as sufficiently compelling to convict.
The German police had CB under 24hr surveillance prior to his entering Italy. This suggests that he was on their radar and in an unusually high profile capacity, at least in terms of resourcing of officers.Its never been clear to me why the German authorities got involved in this.
Is it routine procedure for them to investigate/prosecute their own nationals for crimes committed outside of Germany ?
In relation to Madeleine or the crimes of the drug offences ?The German police had CB under 24hr surveillance prior to his entering Italy. This suggests that he was on their radar and in an unusually high profile capacity, at least in terms of resourcing of officers.
If the case, I'd really question HCW's judgement if he's using JC as his mouthpiece. Surely he can't be that naive?
I am still wondering why JC had that 'exclusive' about extradition that no other media org has reported.
If the case, how mortifying.
I do still find it hard to believe that a professional police force - a 1st world one at that, with every sophisticated crime-solving technology at its disposal - would embark on such a controversial, high profile 'publicity campaign' without being absolutely sure, regardless of what (if any) additional evidence was generated by their appeal, that what they had in hand was always going to be good enough to result in a charge. That was always how HCW framed things, that CB was always a done deal as far as MM is concerned.
But, as you suggest, in the absence of anything else to explain the current bewildering state of play, I guess your theory has to be considered as a mortifying possibility.
![]()
The evidence linking Christian Brueckner to Madeleine McCann's disappearance
As the 44-year-old German is named an official suspect, we look at all the previous evidence against himwww.telegraph.co.uk
"Police finally caught up with Brueckner for the 2005 rape in 2018, arresting him in Italy for skipping parole and extraditing him to Germany to face trial. He was sentenced at the end of 2019 to seven years in jail."
My formatting tools (yet again!) turned off.
They weren't very good then, because he skipped parole and fled to Italy according to this, posted by enquirer6.The German police had CB under 24hr surveillance prior to his entering Italy. This suggests that he was on their radar and in an unusually high profile capacity, at least in terms of resourcing of officers.
So there has been RM who was an official and SM linked to him. Then the three burglars identified by OG from the phone records. Then there were 600 names of possible paedos in the files. Many names from Clement Freud to Martin Ney have been put forward.
Way more than reasonable doubt here. If you are saying it’s unlikely to be anyone else, I think FF would smash that argument easily.
Well if that’s who he’s named, it can’t be anyone else. Now he only has the small matter of proving and prosecuting it.![]()
Maddie McCann suspect Christian Brueckner faces new sex assault charges in weeks
Hans Christian Wolters, heading the inquiry into Madeleine McCann's disappearance, told the Sunday Mirror he will go on TV with a crucial development on the Brueckner file before the end of the monthwww.mirror.co.uk
Sic:
Mr Wolters has named the paedophile as the only suspect over Maddie.
Hi ... I recorded the show in May and it was already about 90 mins..Hi all, hope you are keeping well
I noticed that last week that MWT tweeted this
"and next week my 3 part #MadeleineMcCann programme will be released."
This is now listed on C5 with a runtime of 90 minutes My5 , the earlier release back in May was only about an hour I think. Has anyone viewed this 'extended' version that could fill us in what was left out of the May release.
I remember MWT was setting up for an interview in a pub in Linden, Hanover, but I don't recall seeing that interview when this was originally released.