If it's a hare lip, it wasn't our man.Could it be that he got into a brawl at the time, cut his lip badly etc.
But it could have been a cut or bruise inflicted by someone punching him.
It would be worth asking the witness for their impression.
If it's a hare lip, it wasn't our man.Could it be that he got into a brawl at the time, cut his lip badly etc.
Hello, just want to chime in from time to time as part of the German public!
The whole case is not discussed in TV or newspapers anymore. There are still some documentaries being made about the suspect and they are recounting everything we know about the Maddie case, like bringing it back to public memory but nothing new.
I looked around for any reliable German newspapers and this is what I found on multiple good newspapers:
- Hans-Christian Wolters made a public statement saying that he did never say that they have any proof for Maddie being dead and that this had been dragged through media although it is not true. He says that to this time they don't have any proof for Maddie being dead but because of the profile of the suspect and the case, they handle the investigation as a murder investigation because it is just common for sexual motivated crimes to end in murder.
- The police found used articles of girls clothing in a camper that he owned, swimwear and other childrens clothes. They also found a lot of child, some of it picturing the suspect.
- The police confessed for mistakes in the investigation made in 2014, where they had clues for the suspect being involved in child ponography but could not arrest him right away. It is possible that he destroyed evidence in that time.
This is everything for now![]()
Hello, just want to chime in from time to time as part of the German public!
The whole case is not discussed in TV or newspapers anymore. There are still some documentaries being made about the suspect and they are recounting everything we know about the Maddie case, like bringing it back to public memory but nothing new.
I looked around for any reliable German newspapers and this is what I found on multiple good newspapers:
- Hans-Christian Wolters made a public statement saying that he did never say that they have any proof for Maddie being dead and that this had been dragged through media although it is not true. He says that to this time they don't have any proof for Maddie being dead but because of the profile of the suspect and the case, they handle the investigation as a murder investigation because it is just common for sexual motivated crimes to end in murder.
- The police found used articles of girls clothing in a camper that he owned, swimwear and other childrens clothes. They also found a lot of child, some of it picturing the suspect.
- The police confessed for mistakes in the investigation made in 2014, where they had clues for the suspect being involved in child ponography but could not arrest him right away. It is possible that he destroyed evidence in that time.
This is everything for now![]()
I always thought pigs could eat the flesh but not the bones. Just found out I was wrong.![]()
How do the media get away with telling just straight up lies? They even quoted HCW as saying he had ‘concrete’ evidence maddie was dead. Now he’s denying saying saying anything of the sort. How on earth is it even legal??- Hans-Christian Wolters made a public statement saying that he did never say that they have any proof for Maddie being dead and that this had been dragged through media although it is not true. He says that to this time they don't have any proof for Maddie being dead but because of the profile of the suspect and the case, they handle the investigation as a murder investigation because it is just common for sexual motivated crimes to end in murder.
- The police found used articles of girls clothing in a camper that he owned, swimwear and other childrens clothes. They also found a lot of child, some of it picturing the suspect.
- The police confessed for mistakes in the investigation made in 2014, where they had clues for the suspect being involved in child ponography but could not arrest him right away. It is possible that he destroyed evidence in that time.
This is everything for now![]()
Lots of us use splitting as a defence mechanism, it's not just specific to those with disorders.
Yeah and he likes his victims to be defenceless (bounded, gagged and blindfolded) his victims appear to be anywhere from 3 years old to 72 years old, and they are only ones we actually know of. I’m trying to work out what this guys MO is. The videos of sexual acts with dogs has threw me also. There is nothing off limits with this bloke. Literally nothing it seems...
That was in 2004. In Figueira, only about 20 km northeast from PdL.I read some statements that the suspect allegedly made, and there is this wording that rang a bell. Apparently the suspect said something about pigs eating bodies ... I don't know how reliable this information is but I read it on multiple articles, I'm not sure if this is just hearsay or fact. This rang a bell because not too long ago I read about this girl, Joana Cipriano, who was killed in September 2004. Her uncle and her mother later confessed but her mother withdrew that confession, stating that they have been beaten and tortured during interrogation. Her body was never found but her uncle allegedly said that he fed her body to the pigs. I don't know how reliable that is, regarding the torturing claims.
And I think there was something about blood or anything being found in a pig pen in the Netflix Maddie documentary. May this be related? Or just some weird coincidence?
How do the media get away with telling just straight up lies? They even quoted HCW as saying he had ‘concrete’ evidence maddie was dead. Now he’s denying saying saying anything of the sort. How on earth is it even legal??
I wonder if the dressing up items are 'trophies' from other victims?
It would be interesting to know if he did collect trophies and if there's some item or 'something else' from MM apart from a pic or vid.
Please continue posting!
I also speak german but am not native. But it is clear that the language issue means stuff is being misreported in the UK media.
And this then fits with what I keep shouting about, about the Police needing to speak to the couple who were on Meridian news First week of September of same year Madeleine went missing as they had a man hanging around their Algarve holiday complex taking lots of photos and one Dad had a scuffle with him, demaned he remove photos of his daughter and then asked Reception to call Police, whilst the Dad hung onto this man, but Police arrived the next day. I'd like to know what this man's description was too. I'm pretty sure the family/Dad were from Kent.
I don't want to start a big discussion on this, but to me, the mutilation indicated potential cannibalism. Is this what others take from it too?
ETA Definite lip scar going on there!
Childrens clothing in particular swimming costumes-did this make him a beach snatcher also? Thinking aloud.
Could it be that he got into a brawl at the time, cut his lip badly etc.
Being treated well, or putting some on a "good side" for a narcissist is usually done for the self. They lack empathy so they cannot treat others well, it is usually a manipulation tactic if it appears this way. Everyone is to be used.
Need to take into account the semantics of what he says in reference to what. The 'concrete evidence' was in relation to CB having murdered MM. That is not the same thing as proof of death. To be fair, he's never said he had proof of that.How do the media get away with telling just straight up lies? They even quoted HCW as saying he had ‘concrete’ evidence maddie was dead. Now he’s denying saying saying anything of the sort. How on earth is it even legal??
How do the media get away with telling just straight up lies? They even quoted HCW as saying he had ‘concrete’ evidence maddie was dead. Now he’s denying saying saying anything of the sort. How on earth is it even legal??