- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,947
- Reaction score
- 37,888
Oh dear...the next shitstorm....
Again not everything is a conspiracy.
The samples have already been lifted from the crime scenes years ago and tested. A hair in the case of the 72 year old rape victim. These give profiles and partial profiles which can be then be compared via computer analysis to new suspects. Presumably given the match in the rape case, the hair was then sent to Germany as evidence in the trial.
In the MM case, it is said Portugal already compared the profiles it had on file with CB and found no match.
We don't know if they went to the lengths of retesting the samples but it is hard to see what the point would be. You don't need to do that every time you get a new suspect. It is also hard to understand why Portugal should send evidence it holds of a potential crime, to Germany, based on the say so of a Prosecutor without a lot more.
Of course in the case of young children its very different but its always something I hesitate over for a few secs when leaving someone inside when theres only one key, lock them in-fire hazard. Leave it unlocked. Of course we have a unique situation here.
Good point. In rape case, CB is highly likely culprit. But not for MM.
Can you imagine any LE surrender a precious sample in such a case?
Tomorrow you need it and there's no sample because you sent it to Germany for them to confirm something you already know is zero evidence.
Of course in the case of young children its very different but its always something I hesitate over for a few secs when leaving someone inside when theres only one key, lock them in-fire hazard. Leave it unlocked. Of course we have a unique situation here.
I remember reading this somewhere in the files and I remember being suspicious. The keys were kept in the maintenance room and the maintenance guys could take them the night before their work.
I also remember reading that a washing machine was replaced during McCanns stay and the two guys came to do the job.
Mind you, they arrived only 4-5 days before Madeleine went missing.
Yes I have read that too, amplification is one of the newest techniques in DNA analysis. And indeed, who knows whether this technique can be used on the saliva sample?If the DM article is correct, it sounds as if there was no comparison done on the DNA sample because it was a trace sample and they couldn't get a DNA profile from it.
BBM
Portuguese police sources branded the German request 'typically arrogant', adding that they had already carried out forensic tests on the sample and it was impossible to extract a DNA profile to compare against that of convicted paedophile and rapist Brueckner, 43.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8433555/Portuguese-police-blast-Madeleine-McCann-officers-Germany-arrogant.html
I have been reading a bit on trace DNA samples since reading this, and it seems there is much success in obtaining DNA profiles from trace samples through amplification and other methods.
This may or may not be possible with the trace saliva sample that the Portuguese are holding - but I wonder how the Portuguese can be so sure that no-one else can obtain a DNA profile from the trace sample.
I've always read it that way.
The 'checking system' always sounded like bollocks to me. Are a group of 7 or 8 friends really going to have someone getting up every 5 minutes? And if yes, why? If you feel the need to check on the kids that much, isn't that an obvious indicator that they shouldn't be left alone? I don't think the checks were as regular as we're told.
As for Tannerman, I'm not sure of the timeline and when he came into existence. However, I've always wondered if the sighting was embellished upon, or even fabricated, in order to steer the investigators towards an abductor. There's a certain logic to it.
<modsnip>
And Madeline was heard by the upstairs neighbour the night before crying for daddy wasn’t she?That’s actually just made my blood run cold.... “yes it’s daddy”....ugh
The maintenance guy's name is a tad familiar! I wonder if the T at the start of his name should be a D.
ETA i.e DS, not TS....the guy listed with the other phone number
Hello,
I have finally registered today after being a sporadic lurker the last few years, spending the majority of my lurking reading the Jonbenet threads but also some time on the Mccann board.
Can I ask, what is the general consensus now in this case? Do we now think that CB is credible and this is THE man?
I have always been more on the side of parental involvement as I am in the Ramsey case but I am happy to admit I was wrong in this one.
When is this likely to progress if CB is the right man and when will he be charged and the edivence be released?
Oh dear...the next shitstorm....
And Madeline was heard by the upstairs neighbour the night before crying for daddy wasn’t she?
So many unknowns going on here. But, think it's fair to say the Portuguese LE lost interest in this case a long time ago, I'm not sure they would have had the inclination to keep re-analysing the sample as each new breakthrough in DNA technology came along so it could be from whatever technology was used in 2007.Yes I have read that too, amplification is one of the newest techniques in DNA analysis. And indeed, who knows whether this technique can be used on the saliva sample?
Indeed. You can guarantee these "anonymous sources" are nobody involved in the case who have the detail of what exactly has been requested and why. They probably just asked some random guys in a pub what they thought about it all. Or maybe it's Amaral...Pinch of salt time! It's the `Dailymail' and with more anonymous sources.
'Portuguese police sources branded the German request 'typically arrogant', adding that they had already carried out forensic tests on the sample and it was impossible to extract a DNA profile to compare against that of convicted paedophile and rapist Brueckner, 43. '
ill answer because its not that difficult.Hello,
I have finally registered today after being a sporadic lurker the last few years, spending the majority of my lurking reading the Jonbenet threads but also some time on the Mccann board.
Can I ask, what is the general consensus now in this case? Do we now think that CB is credible and this is THE man?
I have always been more on the side of parental involvement as I am in the Ramsey case but I am happy to admit I was wrong in this one.
When is this likely to progress if CB is the right man and when will he be charged and the edivence be released?
Question. Could you provide source links for all those declarations without using a tabloid source? There's certain things in that list which have been heavily challenged on this thread and cannot be counted as fact or reliable.ill answer because its not that difficult.
CB was in every area that a child had something horrific occur. (so far that's 6 cases confirmed and counting)
He had a usb full of rapes and childand his own depraved acts.
He showed a video of him raping someone to a 'friend'.
Identikits exist of a person that looks like him in more than one case.
He has said that his van is great for transporting drugs and kids.
He said that he'd like to use a child for days on end.
His van has childrens swimwear in it.
He raped a woman only metres from the resort.
He was seen on the day of MM's abduction.
He left the area shortly after MM's abduction.
The German Police say they know that he killed MM.
He took his kiosk's freezers at knife point from the new owners.
He cut the roof off of his van and filled it with water.
He has a history of child sex offences from 1994 til 2017.
He has unexplained wealth and owns properties despite not having earning capacity.
He bragged about, and was seen to enter homes for burglaries in PdL and surrounds.
He was seen staring at the McCann's hotel room and balcony as MM played there.
Witnesses identified him as leaving the area on the night of the abduction.
PdL is known to have multiple p'philes in the area..and there are more just based on the % of pedos in society.
CB refuses to talk to authorities.
You tell me.
ill answer because its not that difficult.
CB was in every area that a child had something horrific occur. (so far that's 6 cases confirmed and counting)
He had a usb full of rapes and childand his own depraved acts.
He showed a video of him raping someone to a 'friend'.
Identikits exist of a person that looks like him in more than one case.
He has said that his van is great for transporting drugs and kids.
He said that he'd like to use a child for days on end.
His van has childrens swimwear in it.
He raped a woman only metres from the resort.
He was seen on the day of MM's abduction.
He left the area shortly after MM's abduction.
The German Police say they know that he killed MM.
He took his kiosk's freezers at knife point from the new owners.
He cut the roof off of his van and filled it with water.
He has a history of child sex offences from 1994 til 2017.
He has unexplained wealth and owns properties despite not having earning capacity.
He bragged about, and was seen to enter homes for burglaries in PdL and surrounds.
He was seen staring at the McCann's hotel room and balcony as MM played there.
Witnesses identified him as leaving the area on the night of the abduction.
PdL is known to have multiple p'philes in the area..and there are more just based on the % of pedos in society.
CB refuses to talk to authorities.
You tell me.
snarky?..FFS.No need to be snarky.
So, in light of all that damning evidence why has he not been charged? Are they still evidence building and expecting something crucial to be found soon?
which ones are debatable?..the only challenges here are speculation..ive just listed what we know from reports. There's a list showing a timeline elsewhere in the threads.Question. Could you provide source links for all those declarations without using a tabloid source? There's certain things in that list which have been heavily challenged on this thread and cannot be counted as fact or reliable.