My God that house in Mirror article isn't it very similar to the one in Carol Everett's drawing from 2007? And she mentions cellar, too... so spooky!!
![]()
![]()
Maddy Maddie McCann
I don't think the houses are alike at all?
My God that house in Mirror article isn't it very similar to the one in Carol Everett's drawing from 2007? And she mentions cellar, too... so spooky!!
![]()
![]()
Maddy Maddie McCann
I hear you, but.. i dont think you can write the source out just because its wikipedia. The page cites the official sources it refers to, thats one of the many rules you need to abide by when contributing...its actually difficult to add to it because you need to cite source, have it verified, and then reviewed and so on..so, its whilst its not the official repository for all things, and it cant claim 100% accuracy, it does do a good job of capturing the facts due to its strict processes....
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. Please keep in mind this could not be an accurate source.
I think he filmed himself.I read of him, full frontal naked on the hood of the jaguar.. it makes one wonder, Who took these pictures of him! Must be a gf surely X
So, Barrocal is popping up again.
It's possible but the full passage is as follows -The Guardian article, which wasn’t about CB as such, said:
“In Germany it is suspected ... that the proof of Madeleine’s death may not be admissible in court because of how it was obtained.”
That would make sense, I guess. Something they know but can’t use? I’m not familiar with German law so I can’t speculate on what’s considered ‘inadmissible’ there.
Madeleine McCann case: tabloids and trolls fill vacuum as wait goes on
Link does not work?Mirror already has developments:
Madeleine McCann suspect buried 'German Maddie' at my allotment, new owner fears
They say he lived there until April 2016, so anything they wanted to check there might have been done since 2013.
New owner, a 30YO woman says she called police and they came "in 2016 at 8am" asked her if she knew him and left after she said no.
I don't know what to say.
So, Barrocal is popping up again.
Mr Piro is the owner of a run-down property in Barrocal near Sao Bartolomeu de Messines a 45-minute drive from Praia da Luz where Brueckner’s VW camper van was seized by police around a year ago.
And what interest would a business man have to bail CB out?
Mr Piro is the owner of a run-down property in Barrocal near Sao Bartolomeu de Messines a 45-minute drive from Praia da Luz where Brueckner’s VW camper van was seized by police around a year ago.
Link does not work?
So, Barrocal is popping up again.
Mr Piro is the owner of a run-down property in Barrocal near Sao Bartolomeu de Messines a 45-minute drive from Praia da Luz where Brueckner’s VW camper van was seized by police around a year ago.
And what interest would a business man have to bail CB out?
Mr Piro is the owner of a run-down property in Barrocal near Sao Bartolomeu de Messines a 45-minute drive from Praia da Luz where Brueckner’s VW camper van was seized by police around a year ago.
CB's ex-gf hiding from the police is making me start thinking she knows something, either about his crimes in general or about MM's abduction/alleged murder, specifically. IMO.
Imagine being born with those tendencies, I'm not at all excusing people who act out on their urges, but there must be an awful lot of people out there who have an attraction to children that they can't just turn off, it actually must be so confusing and shameful for them, they know it's wrong but a feeling is not something you choose, must be a miserable life for the majority who secretly feel that way and spend their lives trying to ignore it. Of course those that do act on it know it's wrong and that's inexcusable, I don't know, it's seen as an 'evil' tendency, but I guess for a lot of people they wish to god they weren't that way. I'm fascinated by psychology and I think so many people are misunderstood, again, that doesn't excuse the behaviour of those that choose to act on their urges.
It's possible but the full passage is as follows -
In Germany it is suspected either that the proof of Madeleine’s death may not be admissible in court because of how it was obtained, or that police are deliberately holding back information that could only be known to the perpetrator in order not to jeopardise the investigation.
So, basically they are just reporting on speculation from in Germany. The problem with the "inadmissable evidence" theory is that German LE have stated repeatedly they have "concrete evidence" that CB murdered MM but they cannot divulge it in case it jeopardises the investigation. Would they really do that knowing that evidence cannot even be used in court? Seems unlikley to me.
The second speculation sounds more reasonable. It's also possible (in fact probable) that there are active agents deep undercover, trying to infiltrate paedophile networks. If the evidence has come via one of these agents, again, it would be dangerous to reveal it since it could alert others to the source of the leak.
On the other hand, if they do have a video, it would make no sense to reveal that at this stage, how would it help? The McCann's would be distraught, the Press would go nuts with it, as would everyone else and it would put the German LE under the most intense pressure. Not to mention any associates could try to destroy any existing evidence in relation to it such as the crime scene. What happens at the end of it all if CB still walks free?
Whatever the evidence is, I suspect it's something very few people know about.
I didn't even see it to be honest, I was just putting down what was in my head.Yes, you are right there is a difference, but I'm not going to do this conversation all over again. I did explain and contemplated on this issue a few threads back and I let it go now.
I didn't even see it to be honest, I was just putting down what was in my head.
<RSBM>
I’m aware of the work of things like TF Argos but it’s controversial, and in some countries illegal, to infiltrate networks that way. That’s why I brought up entrapment also. Not that they have, but it’s possible ...
She did talk to the police, actually (I didn't know). But what she told the police remains secret. So she's not hiding from the police. She's hiding from CB/his "friends."