Elainera
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 12,276
- Reaction score
- 20,780
So ... if she had died on day 1 there's no way the searchers who were interviewed today (see posts on previous pages) would have said what they said. After 10 days they would not have been able to identify scratches on the skin for example. I don't want to spell it out, I think you all know what I mean. She was apparently not in an advanced stage of decomposition. That's also why the parents were asked to id her. If she had been dead for 10 days they would not have been asked to.
It's very likely Nora was alive until a couple of days ago
And if she was not found in the water she might not have drowned. Then what did she die of? You don't starve in 10 days.
Maybe that's why the autopsy is taking so long? Difficulties to establish COD? Experts brought in?
All moo.
It's very likely Nora was alive until a couple of days ago

And if she was not found in the water she might not have drowned. Then what did she die of? You don't starve in 10 days.
Maybe that's why the autopsy is taking so long? Difficulties to establish COD? Experts brought in?
All moo.