Google is loaded with this guy and he has been discussed on every forum. Here is an interesting look at March 2008 in another case unrelated. He made no sense then either.
http://fl.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CMFL%5C2008%5C20080326_0000887.MFL.htm/qx
Furlow v. McClinton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Docket Number available at
www.versuslaw.com
Citation Number available at
www.versuslaw.com
March 26, 2008
ELGINE WILSON FURLOW, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HEZEKIAH MCCLINTON, DEFENDANT.
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) filed by the Plaintiff, Elgine Wilson Furlow ("Furlow"), and the Motion (Doc. 6) (titled "Appeal Order") seeking reconsideration of an order denying his previous attempt to proceed in forma pauperis, which the Court construes as an amended application for pauper status. The amended complaint, though several pages longer than the initial complaint, is no more coherent. The Court is still unable to discern either a federal cause of action or allegations sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. In addition, Furlow's financial statement (Doc. 3 at 1) remains incomplete and therefore insufficient to establish pauper status. It is therefore
ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 6) is DENIED and the Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. The Plaintiff will be given one final chance to fix the problems identified above. The Plaintiff shall have 11 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint setting forth a cognizable claim within the limited jurisdiction of this Court. Any such amended complaint shall be accompanied by either the filing fee or an amended application for pauper status. Failure to satisfy these requirements will result in dismissal with prejudice.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida on March 26, 2008.
Sad IMO.
