- Joined
- Dec 17, 2004
- Messages
- 379
- Reaction score
- 424

'40 years later' | Woman found in steamer trunk in Gambrill Mountain still unknown
The Doe Network has released photo sketches of what the unidentified woman might have looked like.

Thanks, from link..![]()
'40 years later' | Woman found in steamer trunk in Gambrill Mountain still unknown
The Doe Network has released photo sketches of what the unidentified woman might have looked like.www.wusa9.com
I actually sent this possible match into PSP on March 7, 2005. In looking at the old email, I used the link (no longer works) to the City of Frederick site. That must have been right around the time the girl in the trunk was being added to DN (City of Frederick site is a source). If she had already been added, I would have used the DN link.
At that time, also noted in the email, Anne's dentals were available through LE (this was pre-NamUs). If and when they were uploaded to NamUs, I don't know. But I have a hard time believing that, in the intervening 17 years, with other people apparently submitting the same possible match, that it hasn't been looked at. Could be she was ruled out years ago (by dentals or the collarbone), prior to NamUs, which would explain the rule out not being on the exclusions list.
Of course, over the years LE folks have transferred, retired, moved on. Others take over and may or may not have even looked at the case and may not even be aware of the possible match and/or rule out.
JMO and 2 cents worth.![]()
Is Othram involved? They seem to be able to accomplish a lot with just a little DNA.Also, The Doe Network says that Jane Doe has "insufficient DNA for profiling".... But that status hasn't been updated in a while. Even then, do y'all think it would be enough DNA to do a comparison with a missing person?
I was also told there’s no cold-case unit, and they review these when they can...Not gonna lie, it would be a major setback if Anne isn't the Jane Doe. (And I heard that Virginia Welch's dental records were apparently destroyed in a fire. Wow.) What if they had excluded her all those years ago and no one ever bothered to properly document it? Because there's no evidence or proof that she was excluded, we're playing a waiting game now.
In all honesty, it wouldn't be the first time an exclusion didn't appear, let alone on NamUs. Sigh.
It was stated that about three years ago, they submitted the trunk to the forensic lab and they were unable to extract usable DNA…Is Othram involved? They seem to be able to accomplish a lot with just a little DNA.
Not to my knowledgeIs Othram involved? They seem to be able to accomplish a lot with just a little DNA.
What about any DNA from Jane Doe's skeleton/remains? Would it be possible to extract a small amount of DNA from one of her teeth?It was stated that about three years ago, they submitted the trunk to the forensic lab and they were unable to extract usable DNA…
There's no possibility to do anything with her remains...What about any DNA from Jane Doe's skeleton/remains? Would it be possible to extract a small amount of DNA from one of her teeth?
Why's that? Was she cremated or were her remains lost?There's no possibility to do anything with her remains...
Not sure. It says here that the NCMEC tried to extract DNA from the remains, but the amount was insufficient.Why's that? Was she cremated or were her remains lost?
It would be nice if @othram would take her case if possible!Based on that link, the last known DNA extraction attempt, which resulted in insufficient DNA for sequencing/profiling, was in 2012. Since it was attempted on her remains, they most likely have access to them still, which is good news. There have been advances in extraction techniques since then, and if it hasn't been attempted more recently, it might be worth another try now. They can even create a DNA profile from a strand of hair without a follicle now.
On a side now, they can even attempt DNA extraction from cremated remains now, in some cases where the heat may not have destroyed bone or teeth material.